在升级Android游戏应用的20个2秒长的音频效果文件时，开发者面临选择.wav或.flac格式的决定。.wav是更广泛支持的格式，而.flac在所有支持SDK 19及以上的设备上也应被支持，并且体积更小。尽管.flac能节省约160KB的空间，但考虑到当前23MB的APK大小，这并非主要考虑因素。开发者倾向于使用更为基础的.wav格式，因为两者都是无损的，且解压缩时间在短音频中几乎察觉不到。
I'm upgrading about twenty .mp3 sound effect files in an android game application. The files are all about 2 seconds long so the size difference per file is about 30 KB for .wav, 22 KB for .flac, and 6 KB for .mp3. My minimum sdk is 19 (Android 4.4) so, at least according to the docs, .flac should be supported by all devices running my app despite .wav being otherwise the more supported format.
Both are supposed to be lossless, although .flac is compressed, so you have decompression time. I expect that would be near undetectable though in this case. Since my production APK is about 23 MB, I'm not that concerned with the 160 KB or so I'd save using .flac vs .wav, and for this reason I'm thinking of just going with what I expect is the more 'base' .wav format.
Which would be the better default format for short audio clips?
扫一扫
384
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
