Style(Chapter 9 of JavaScript: The Good Parts)

　　I want to avoid idioms that look like mistakes.

　　I never allow switch cases to fall through to the next case. I once found a bug in my code caused by an unintended fall through immediately after having made a vigorous speech about why fall through was sometimes useful. I was fortunate in that I was able to learn from the experience. When reviewing the features of a language, I now pay special attention to features that are sometimes useful but occasionally dangerous. Those are the worst parts because it is difficult to tell whether they are being used correctly. That is a place where bugs hide.

　　Quality was not a motivating concern in the design, implementation, or standardization of JavaScript. That puts a greater burden on the users of the language to resist the language's weaknesses.

JavaScript provides support for large programs, but it also provides forms and idioms that work against large programs. For example, JavaScript provides conveniences for the use of global variables, but global variables become increasingly problematic as programs scale in complexity.

　　I use a single global variable to contain an application or library. Every object has its own namespace, so it is easy to use objects to organize my code. Use of closure provides further information hiding, increasing the strength of my modules.

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/zhtf2014/archive/2010/07/14/1777159.html