博主在配置NAS时遇到了一个问题，使用Openfiler和RAID5阵列的4个WDRE3驱动器，发现从RAID5到LVM卷的读取性能显著下降。hdparm测试显示，在元设备上的读取速度远高于LVM卷的速度。这引发了对LVM性能的疑问。文章中，博主提供了hdparm的测试结果，显示了顺序读取速度的差异，并引用了hdparm手册页的相关部分，探讨了可能影响性能的因素。
我正在尝试调整我的NAS,运行openfiler,并想知道为什么我从RAID 5中的4个WD RE3驱动器获得相对较差的读取性能.
编辑：请注意我说的缓冲磁盘读取速度不缓存速度
编辑：更改格式以明确有两组输出.
当我在元设备上运行hdparm时,我得到了我期望的性能水平,降低到音量,这是速度的三分之一！
任何人都知道为什么？ LVM不好吗？
院长
元设备/ dev / md0结果
[root@nas2 etc]# hdparm -tT /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Timing cached reads: 4636 MB in 2.00 seconds = 2318.96 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 524 MB in 3.01 seconds = 174.04 MB/sec
Vol group / dev / mapper / vg1-vol1结果
[root@nas2 etc]# hdparm -tT /dev/mapper/vg1-vol1
/dev/mapper/vg1-vol1:
Timing cached reads: 4640 MB in 2.00 seconds = 2320.28 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 200 MB in 3.01 seconds = 66.43 MB/sec
编辑：请参阅hdparm手册页中的部分,该部分建议这是对顺序读取性能完全有效的测试,这是我试图解决的问题.
-t Perform timings of device reads for benchmark and comparison purposes. For meaningful results,this operation should be repeated 2-3 times on an otherwise
inactive system (no other active processes) with at least a couple of megabytes of free memory. This displays the speed of reading through the buffer
cache to the disk without any prior caching of data. This measurement is an indication of how fast the drive can sustain sequential data reads under
Linux,without any filesystem overhead. To ensure accurate measurements,the buffer cache is flushed during the processing of -t using the BLKFLSBUF
ioctl. If the -T flag is also specified,then a correction factor based on the outcome of -T will be incorporated into the result reported for the -t
operation.
扫一扫
676
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
