java 模板类 静态变量,定义模板类的静态常量变量

I have a vector class which has some static const variables like ZERO. Now since vector is often implemented as a template class (and mine is no exception), I see a lot of this code:

template<> const Vector2 Vector2::ZERO;

template<> const Vector2 Vector2::UNIT_X(1, 0);

//... and so on, and then all code duplicated for other types (int, double, long double)

// including different sizes of the Vector (Vector2, Vector3, Vector4)

My question is, can I do something like this instead to avoid duplicating code just for a different type:

template

const Vector Vector::ZERO;

Can that satisfy all future types? If not, will it make a difference if I put the following to explicitly define the classes for the various types:

template Vector;

template Vector;

So far, I have tested it on Visual C++ (2008) and it compiles fine and the tests pass, but I am wondering if this is non-standard code.

解决方案

No, that's perfectly legitimate and totally Standard. If you want to use a static variable in a templated class, there's no way you could possibly define all possible instantiations of it- those types may not even be nameable and therefore specializable. Hence, it's very necessary that template classes can have static variables defined for all possible uses.