java checkfornull,javax.annotation中:@Nullable VS @CheckForNull

What is the difference between the two? Both seem to mean that the value may be null and should be dealt with accordingly i.e. checked for null.

Update:

The two annotations above are part of JSR-305/FindBugs:

http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/manual/annotations.html

解决方案

I think it is pretty clear from the link you added: if you use @CheckForNull and the code that uses the value does not check for null, FindBugs will show it as an error.

FindBugs will ignore @Nullable.

In practice this annotation is useful only for overriding an overarching NonNull annotation.

Use @CheckForNull in the cases when the value must always be checked. Use @Nullable where null might be OK.

EDIT: it seems that @CheckForNull is not well supported at the moment, so I suggest avoiding it and using @NonNull (also see Which @NotNull Java annotation should I use?).

Another idea would be to get in touch directly with the FindBugs developers, and ask their opinion about the inconsistency in the documentation.

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值