Difference between LET and LET* in Common LISP

Difference between LET and LET* in Common LISP
 
LET
 
Parallel binding which means the bindings come to life at the same time and they do not shadow each other. The values are effective inside LET and they are undefined outside LET. Just like local variables.
 
LET binds variables all at the same time.
 
None of the variables defined in the LET have a value after lisp has finished evaluating the form.
 
Example 1:
 
Input:
* (setf x 'outside)
* (let ((x 'inside)
        (y x))
        (list x y))
 
Output:
(INSIDE OUTSIDE)
 
Example 2:
 
Input:
( let  ((a 3)
      (b 4)
      (c 5))
     (* (+ a b)c))
 
Output:
35
 
Example 3:
 
Input:
(setq a 10)
( let  ((a 3)
      (m a))
     (+m a))
 
Output:
13
 
 
 
 
LET*
 
Sequential binding.
 
Example:
 
Input:
* (setf x 'outside)
* (let* ((x 'inside)
         (y x))
         (list x y))
 
Output:
(INSIDE INSIDE)
 
 
 
It always more efficient to use LET than LET*. Since the program can run parallel when using LET.
  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值