个人作业-Week3

个人作业-Week3

1. 软件工程师的成长

同学们在上这门课的时候，还是大三，你的困难和迷茫，别人一定有过。请看看别人怎么学习的，有些是科班，有些是野路子，有些成功，有些失败。 请读完下面所有博客（也可以再读一些你觉得有意思的博客），谈谈自己的感想，你现在的条件比他们如何？你对计算机的热爱仅仅是口头的么？IT专业的技术道路，职业道路，社会道路怎么计划呢

感想：如果要在计算机这条道路上走的更远，需要基础扎实，更需要不断的学习和创新。

条件：与他们中的一些人相当甚至更好

我对计算机的热爱不仅是口头上的，在平时的学习生活中，我也十分愿意使用编程的方法解决一些实际的问题。

计划：以后可能会读研，进入公司工作，职业道路和社会道路的规划简而言之就是先做一个程序员，然后通过参与不同的项目不断提升自己，使自己的水平不断提高。

2. 代码复审

每位同学复审其结对编程的伙伴的个人项目，并写一个个人博客报告复审结果

General

• Does the code work? Does it perform its intended function, the logic is correct etc.

◦                     Yes.

• Is all the code easily understood?

◦                     Yes.

• Does it conform to your agreed coding conventions? These will usually cover location of braces, variable and function names, line length, indentations, formatting, and comments.

◦                     Yes.

• Is there any redundant or duplicate code?

◦                     Yes.

• Is the code as modular as possible?

◦                     Yes.

• Can any global variables be replaced?

◦                     Yes.

• Is there any commented out code?

◦                     Yes.

• Do loops have a set length and correct termination conditions?

◦                     Yes.

• Can any of the code be replaced with library functions?

◦                     No.

• Can any logging or debugging code be removed?

◦                     No.

Security

• Are all data inputs checked (for the correct type, length, format, and range) and encoded?

◦                     Yes.

• Where third-party utilities are used, are returning errors being caught?

◦                     No.

• Are output values checked and encoded?

◦                     No.

• Are invalid parameter values handled?

◦                     Yes.

Documentation

• Do comments exist and describe the intent of the code?

◦                     No.

• Are all functions commented?

◦                     No.

• Is any unusual behavior or edge-case handling described?

◦                     Yes.

• Is the use and function of third-party libraries documented?

◦                     No.

• Are data structures and units of measurement explained?

◦                     No.

• Is there any incomplete code? If so, should it be removed or flagged with a suitable marker like ‘TODO’?

◦                     No.

Testing

• Is the code testable? i.e. don’t add too many or hide dependencies, unable to initialize objects, test frameworks can use methods etc.

◦                     Yes.

• Do tests exist and are they comprehensive? i.e. has at least your agreed on code coverage.

◦                     No.

• Do unit tests actually test that the code is performing the intended functionality?

◦                     Yes.

• Are arrays checked for ‘out-of-bound’ errors?

◦                     No.

• Could any test code be replaced with the use of an existing API?

◦                     No.

 

 

 

 

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/jisuozhao/p/5926488.html