本期内容:
Direct Access
Kafka
前面有几期我们讲了带Receiver的Spark Streaming 应用的相关源码解读。但是现在开发Spark Streaming的应用越来越多的采用No Receivers(Direct Approach)的方式,No Receiver的方式的优势:
1. 更强的控制自由度
2. 语义一致性
其实No Receivers的方式更符合我们读取数据,操作数据的思路的。因为Spark 本身是一个计算框架,他底层会有数据来源,如果没有Receivers,我们直接操作数据来源,这其实是一种更自然的方式。 如果要操作数据来源,肯定要有一个封装器,这个封装器一定是RDD类型。 以直接访问Kafka中的数据为例:
object DirectKafkaWordCount { def main(args: Array[String]) { val Array(brokers, topics) = args // Create context with 2 second batch interval val sparkConf = new SparkConf().setAppName("DirectKafkaWordCount") val ssc = new StreamingContext(sparkConf, Seconds(2)) // Create direct kafka stream with brokers and topics val topicsSet = topics.split(",").toSet val kafkaParams = Map[String, String]("metadata.broker.list" -> brokers) val messages = KafkaUtils.createDirectStream[String, String, StringDecoder, StringDecoder]( ssc, kafkaParams, topicsSet) // Get the lines, split them into words, count the words and print val lines = messages.map(_._2) val words = lines.flatMap(_.split(" ")) val wordCounts = words.map(x => (x, 1L)).reduceByKey(_ + _) wordCounts.print() // Start the computation ssc.start() ssc.awaitTermination() } }
Spark Streaming会封装一个KafkaRDD:
/** * A batch-oriented interface for consuming from Kafka. * Starting and ending offsets are specified in advance, * so that you can control exactly-once semantics. * @param kafkaParams Kafka <a href="http://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#configuration"> * configuration parameters</a>. Requires "metadata.broker.list" or "bootstrap.servers" to be set * with Kafka broker(s) specified in host1:port1,host2:port2 form. * @param offsetRanges offset ranges that define the Kafka data belonging to this RDD * @param messageHandler function for translating each message into the desired type */private[kafka]class KafkaRDD[ K: ClassTag, V: ClassTag, U <: Decoder[_]: ClassTag, T <: Decoder[_]: ClassTag, R: ClassTag] private[spark] ( sc: SparkContext, kafkaParams: Map[String, String], val offsetRanges: Array[OffsetRange], leaders: Map[TopicAndPartition, (String, Int)], messageHandler: MessageAndMetadata[K, V] => R ) extends RDD[R](sc, Nil) with Logging with HasOffsetRanges { override def getPartitions: Array[Partition] = { offsetRanges.zipWithIndex.map { case (o, i) => val (host, port) = leaders(TopicAndPartition(o.topic, o.partition)) new KafkaRDDPartition(i, o.topic, o.partition, o.fromOffset, o.untilOffset, host, port) }.toArray } ... override def compute(thePart: Partition, context: TaskContext): Iterator[R] = { val part = thePart.asInstanceOf[KafkaRDDPartition] assert(part.fromOffset <= part.untilOffset, errBeginAfterEnd(part)) if (part.fromOffset == part.untilOffset) { log.info(s"Beginning offset ${part.fromOffset} is the same as ending offset " + s"skipping ${part.topic} ${part.partition}") Iterator.empty } else { new KafkaRDDIterator(part, context) } }
RDD中重要的方法 getPartitions 和 compute 其中compute中返回了一个 KafkaRDDIterator:
private class KafkaRDDIterator( part: KafkaRDDPartition, context: TaskContext) extends NextIterator[R] { val kc = new KafkaCluster(kafkaParams) ... private def fetchBatch: Iterator[MessageAndOffset] = { val req = new FetchRequestBuilder() .addFetch(part.topic, part.partition, requestOffset, kc.config.fetchMessageMaxBytes) .build() val resp = consumer.fetch(req) handleFetchErr(resp) // kafka may return a batch that starts before the requested offset resp.messageSet(part.topic, part.partition) .iterator .dropWhile(_.offset < requestOffset) } override def close(): Unit = { if (consumer != null) { consumer.close() } } override def getNext(): R = { if (iter == null || !iter.hasNext) { iter = fetchBatch } if (!iter.hasNext) { assert(requestOffset == part.untilOffset, errRanOutBeforeEnd(part)) finished = true null.asInstanceOf[R] } else { val item = iter.next() if (item.offset >= part.untilOffset) { assert(item.offset == part.untilOffset, errOvershotEnd(item.offset, part)) finished = true null.asInstanceOf[R] } else { requestOffset = item.nextOffset messageHandler(new MessageAndMetadata( part.topic, part.partition, item.message, item.offset, keyDecoder, valueDecoder)) } } } }
其中会调用KafkaCluster的connect方法:
org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/KafkaCluster.scala def connect(host: String, port: Int): SimpleConsumer = new SimpleConsumer(host, port, config.socketTimeoutMs, config.socketReceiveBufferBytes, config.clientId)
KafkaCluster的connect方法返回了一个 SimpleConsumer,如果想自定义控制kafka消息的消费,则可自定义Kafka的consumer。
我们再回过头看看:
KafkaUtils.createDirectStream[String, String, StringDecoder, StringDecoder]( ssc, kafkaParams, topicsSet)
实际生成了什么:
def createDirectStream[ K: ClassTag, V: ClassTag, KD <: Decoder[K]: ClassTag, VD <: Decoder[V]: ClassTag, R: ClassTag] ( ssc: StreamingContext, kafkaParams: Map[String, String], fromOffsets: Map[TopicAndPartition, Long], messageHandler: MessageAndMetadata[K, V] => R ): InputDStream[R] = { val cleanedHandler = ssc.sc.clean(messageHandler) new DirectKafkaInputDStream[K, V, KD, VD, R] ssc, kafkaParams, fromOffsets, cleanedHandler) }
生成了一个DirectKafkaInputDStream:
org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaInputDStream.scala override def compute(validTime: Time): Option[KafkaRDD[K, V, U, T, R]] = { val untilOffsets = clamp(latestLeaderOffsets(maxRetries)) val rdd = KafkaRDD[K, V, U, T, R]( context.sparkContext, kafkaParams, currentOffsets, untilOffsets, messageHandler) // Report the record number and metadata of this batch interval to InputInfoTracker. val offsetRanges = currentOffsets.map { case (tp, fo) => val uo = untilOffsets(tp) OffsetRange(tp.topic, tp.partition, fo, uo.offset) } val description = offsetRanges.filter { offsetRange => // Don't display empty ranges. offsetRange.fromOffset != offsetRange.untilOffset }.map { offsetRange => s"topic: ${offsetRange.topic}\tpartition: ${offsetRange.partition}\t" + s"offsets: ${offsetRange.fromOffset} to ${offsetRange.untilOffset}" }.mkString("\n") // Copy offsetRanges to immutable.List to prevent from being modified by the user val metadata = Map( "offsets" -> offsetRanges.toList, StreamInputInfo.METADATA_KEY_DESCRIPTION -> description) val inputInfo = StreamInputInfo(id, rdd.count, metadata) ssc.scheduler.inputInfoTracker.reportInfo(validTime, inputInfo) currentOffsets = untilOffsets.map(kv => kv._1 -> kv._2.offset) Some(rdd) }
这里面即产生了KafkaRDD实例。
我们再重新思考有Receiver和No Receiver的Spark Streaming应用 Direct访问的好处:
1. 不需要缓存,不会出现OOM等问题(数据缓存在Kafka中)
2. 如果采用Receiver的方式,Receiver和Worker上Executor绑定了,不方便做分布式(配置一下也可以做)。如果采用Direct的方式,直接是RDD操作,数据默认分布在多个Executor上,天然就是分布式的。
3. 数据消费的问题,在实际操作的时候,如果采用Receiver的方式,如果数据操作来不及消费,Delay多次之后,Spark Streaming程序有可能崩溃。如果是Direct的方式,就不会。
4. 完全的语义一致性,不会重复消费,且只被消费一次。
备注:
1、DT大数据梦工厂微信公众号DT_Spark
2、IMF晚8点大数据实战YY直播频道号:68917580
3、新浪微博: http://www.weibo.com/ilovepains
转载于:https://blog.51cto.com/lqding/1784888