与三角有关的级数求和

壁纸：C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.Windows.ContentDeliveryManager_cw5n1h2txyewy\LocalState\Assets

C:\Users\%username%\AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.Windows.ContentDeliveryManager_cw5n1h2txyewy\LocalState\Assets\

新的文件夹内新建一个rename的txt文档，里面写上命令ren * *.jpg，然后修改成bat格式后双击就能完成所有图片添加为jpg的格式后缀.

---

Does $S_k= \sum \limits_{n=1}^{\infty}\sin(n^k)/n$ converge for all $k>0$?

**Motivation**: I recently learned that $S_1$ [converges](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet%27s_test). I think $S_2$ converges by the integral test. Was the question known in general?

来源：https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2270/convergence-of-sum-limits-n-1-infty-sinnk-n

---

This is a replacement for my previous answer. The sum converges, and this fact needs even more math than I believed before.

Begin by using summation by parts. This gives
$$\sum_{n=1}^N \left(\sum_{m=1}^N \sin(m^k) \right) \left( \frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}\right) + \frac{1}{N+1} \left(\sum_{m=1}^N \sin(m^k) \right).$$
Write $S_n:= \left(\sum_{m=1}^n \sin(m^k) \right)$. So this is
$$\sum_{n=1}^N S_n/(n(n+1)) + S_N/(N+1).$$
The second term goes to zero by Weyl's [polynomial equidistribution theorem][1]. So your question is equivalent to the question of whether $\sum s_n/(n(n+1))$ converges. We may as well clean this up a little: Since $|S_n| \leq n$, we know that $\sum S_n \left( 1/n(n+1) - 1/n^2 \right)$ converges. So the question is whether
$$\sum \frac{S_n}{n^2}$$
converges.

I will show that $S_n$ is small enough that $\sum S_n/n^2$ converges absolutely.

The way I want to prove this is to use [Weyl's inequality][2]. Let $p_i/q_i$ be an infinite sequence of rational numbers such that $|1/(2 \pi) - p_i/q_i| < 1/q_i^2$. Such a sequence exists by a standard lemma. Weyl inequality gives that
$$S_N = O\left(N^{1+\epsilon} (q_i^{-1} + N^{-1} + q_i N^{-k})^{1/2^{k-1}} \right)$$
for any $\epsilon>0$.

<hr>

Thanks to George Lowther for pointing out the next step: According to [Salikhov][3], for $q$ sufficiently large, we have
$$|\pi - p/q| > 1/q^{7.6304+\epsilon}.$$
Since $x \mapsto 1/(2x)$ is Lipschitz near $\pi$, and since $p/q$ near $\pi$ implies that $p$ and $q$ are nearly proportional, we also have the lower bound $|1/(2 \pi) - p/q|> 1/q^{7.6304+\epsilon}$.

Let $p_i/q_i$ be the convergents of the continued fraction of $1/(2 \pi)$. By a standard result, $|1/(2 \pi) - p_i/q_i| \leq 1/(q_i q_{i+1})$. Thus, $q_{i+1} \leq q_i^{6.6304 + \epsilon}$ for $i$ sufficiently large. Thus, the intervals $[q_i, q_i^{7}]$ contain all sufficiently large integers.

For any large enough $N$, choose $q_i$ such that $N^{k-1} \in [q_i, q_i^7]$. Then Weyl's inequality gives the bound
$$S_N = O \left( N^{1+\epsilon} \left(N^{-(k-1)/7} + N^{-1} + N^{-1} \right)^{1/2^{k-1}}\right)$$

So $S_N = O(N^{1-(k-1)/(7\cdot 2^{k-1}) + \epsilon})$, which is enough to make sure the sum converges.
${ }{}{}{}{}$

[1]: http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/03/28/254b-notes-1-equidistribution-of-polynomial-sequences-in-torii/
[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weyl%27s_inequality
[3]: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IrrationalityMeasure.html

 

转载于:https://www.cnblogs.com/Eufisky/p/9749159.html