按照上图所示配置好所有基本配置,配置如下:
R1:
R1#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. R1(config)#int s 1/1 R1(config-if)#ip add 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 R1(config-if)#no shutdown R1(config-if)#clo ra 64000 R1(config-if)#router eigrp 1 R1(config-router)#net 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 R1(config-router)#no auto R1(config-router)#exi R1(config)# |
R2:
R2(config)#int s 1/1 R2(config-if)#ip add 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 R2(config-if)#no shutdown R2(config-if)#int s 1/0 R2(config-if)#ip add 20.20.20.1 255.255.255.0 R2(config-if)#no shutdown R2(config-if)#clo ra 64000 R2(config-if)#exi R2(config)#router eigrp 1 R2(config-router)#net 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 R2(config-router)#net 20.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 R2(config-router)#no auto R2(config-router)#exi R2(config)# |
R3:
R3#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. R3(config)#int s 1/1 R3(config-if)#ip add 20.20.20.2 255.255.255.0 R3(config-if)#no shutdown R3(config-if)#exi R3(config)#router eigrp 1 R3(config-router)#net 40.40.40.0 0.0.0.255 R3(config-router)#net 20.20.20.0 0.0.0.255 R3(config-router)#no auto R3(config-router)#exi |
注意,上图为本实验原图的截图,按照刚才上一页的配置,我们已经完成了除R2-R3以太网连接配置的所有其他配置,现在我们去看一下从R1访问R3的LOOP 0接口的开销为多少?见以下。
R1#show ip route
*Jun 2 21:51:34.123: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console R1#show ip route 40.40.40.0 Routing entry for 40.40.40.0/24 Known via "eigrp 1", distance 90, metric 2809856, type internal Redistributing via eigrp 1 Last update from 10.10.10.2 on Serial1/1, 00:12:22 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 10.10.10.2, from 10.10.10.2, 00:12:22 ago, via Serial1/1 Route metric is 2809856, traffic share count is 1 Total delay is 45000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes Loading 1/255, Hops 2 R1# |
从以上配置可以看出从R1到达目的地40.40.40.0的Metric为metric 2809856,从R1上通过查看TOP表可以看到如下内容。
R1#show ip eigrp topo IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(10.10.10.1) Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply, r - reply Status, s - sia Status P 10.10.10.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2169856 via Connected, Serial1/1 P 20.20.20.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2681856 via 10.10.10.2 (2681856/2169856), Serial1/1 P 30.30.30.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2684416 via 10.10.10.2 (2684416/2172416), Serial1/1 P 40.40.40.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2809856 via 10.10.10.2 (2809856/2297856), Serial1/1 R1# |
从以上可见从R1到达40.40.40.0的后继为如上配置加粗部分,其FD=2809856.
现在我们去配置以上截图部分R2的以太网口和R3的以太网口地址分别设置为30.30.30.2和30.30.30.3并把相应地址通告入EIGRP,见如下配置。
R2:
R2(config)#int fa 0/0 R2(config-if)#ip add 30.30.30.2 255.255.255.0 R2(config-if)#no shutdown R2(config-if)#exi R2(config)#router eigrp 1 R2(config-router)#net 30.30.30.0 0.0.0.255 R2(config-router)#exi R2(config)# |
R3:
R3(config)#int fa 0/0 R3(config-if)#ip add 30.30.30.3 255.255.255.0 R3(config-if)#no shutdown R3(config-if)#exi R3(config)#router eigrp 1 R3(config-router)#net 30.30.30.0 0.0.0.255 R3(config-router)#exi R3(config)# |
在配置好以上设置,并提示正确邻接后回到R1,查看TOP表中到达40.40.40.0的后继是否被度量值更优的新的后继代替,见如下显示。
R1#show ip eigrp topo IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(10.10.10.1) Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply, r - reply Status, s - sia Status P 10.10.10.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2169856 via Connected, Serial1/1 P 20.20.20.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2681856 via 10.10.10.2 (2681856/2169856), Serial1/1 P 30.30.30.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2172416 via 10.10.10.2 (2172416/28160), Serial1/1 P 40.40.40.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2300416 via 10.10.10.2 (2300416/156160), Serial1/1 R1# |
由以上查看显示,Metric更小的后继已经顶替了劣质的后继,成为了新的后继,因此从此实验可以看出,EIGRP的后继抢夺具有实时性!
那么为什么以前的后继被抢夺了呢,是因为通过以太网的默认链路带宽远大于通过Serial的链路带宽,并且延迟也更加小,只有100 usec,所以通过以太链路到达目的地具有更小的度量值。
转载于:https://blog.51cto.com/lanyue24/31275