【原创】Stringification 在二级宏定义中的使用

        最近在研究 Redis-2.6.12 的源码时,重新对一处宏展开的用法进行了梳理,记录如下:  

在 zmalloc.h 中有如下定义,  
?
1
2
3
/* Double expansion needed for stringification of macro values. */
#define __xstr(s) __str(s)
#define __str(s) #s
       在注释中出现了一个专有名词“   stringification   ”,经查阅,网络上比较认可的翻译是“字符串化”。所以上面双重宏定义的用途为“用于宏值字符串化的双重宏展开   ”。这个概念似乎比较模糊,无法让我深刻理解其用意,幸好有下面的   资料    
?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
3.4 Stringification
 
Sometimes you may want to convert a macro argument into a string constant. Parameters are not replaced inside
string constants, but you can use the ‘ #’ preprocessing operator instead. When a macro parameter is used with
a leading ‘ #’, the preprocessor replaces it with the literal text of the actual argument, converted to a string
constant. Unlike normal parameter replacement, the argument is not macro-expanded first. This is called stringification.
 
There is no way to combine an argument with surrounding text and stringify it all together. Instead, you can
write a series of adjacent string constants and stringified arguments. The preprocessor will replace the
stringified arguments with string constants. The C compiler will then combine all the adjacent string constants
into one long string.
 
Here is an example of a macro definition that uses stringification:
 
      #define WARN_IF(EXP) \
      do { if (EXP) \
              fprintf (stderr, "Warning: " #EXP "\n"); } \
      while (0)
      WARN_IF (x == 0);
           ==> do { if (x == 0)
                 fprintf (stderr, "Warning: " "x == 0" "\n" ); } while (0);
The argument for EXP is substituted once, as-is, into the if statement, and once, stringified, into the argument
to fprintf. If x were a macro, it would be expanded in the if statement, but not in the string.
 
The do and while (0) are a kludge to make it possible to write WARN_IF (arg);, which the resemblance of WARN_IF
to a function would make C programmers want to do ; see Swallowing the Semicolon.
 
Stringification in C involves more than putting double-quote characters around the fragment. The preprocessor
backslash-escapes the quotes surrounding embedded string constants, and all backslashes within string and character
constants, in order to get a valid C string constant with the proper contents. Thus, stringifying p = "foo\n" ;
results in "p = \"foo\\n\";" . However, backslashes that are not inside string or character constants are not
duplicated: ‘\n’ by itself stringifies to "\n" .
 
All leading and trailing whitespace in text being stringified is ignored. Any sequence of whitespace in the middle
of the text is converted to a single space in the stringified result. Comments are replaced by whitespace long before
  stringification happens, so they never appear in stringified text.
 
There is no way to convert a macro argument into a character constant.
 
If you want to stringify the result of expansion of a macro argument, you have to use two levels of macros.
 
      #define xstr(s) str(s)
      #define str(s) #s
      #define foo 4
      str (foo)
           ==> "foo"
      xstr (foo)
           ==> xstr (4)
           ==> str (4)
           ==> "4"
s is stringified when it is used in str, so it is not macro-expanded first. But s is an ordinary argument
to xstr, so it is completely macro-expanded before xstr itself is expanded (see Argument Prescan). Therefore,
by the time str gets to its argument, it has already been macro-expanded.
      内容有点长,但确实是对    Stringification 作出了全面的解释。其中也对双重宏定义的用法进行了举例说明。针对 xstr(foo) 展开的情况,由于 xstr() 本身是一个符合普通宏展开定义的东东,而 foo 同样是这样的一个东东   ,所以,在对    xstr(foo) 进行宏展开的时,会按照正常的展开顺序进行,即先展开 foo,再展开 xstr 。  

      至于采用二级宏定义的好处,当然就是可以更加灵活的对宏展开时的内容进行控制  
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值