说明:Executors各个方法的弊端:
1)newFixedThreadPool和newSingleThreadExecutor:
主要问题是堆积的请求处理队列可能会耗费非常大的内存,甚至OOM。
2)newCachedThreadPool和newScheduledThreadPool:
主要问题是线程数最大数是Integer.MAX_VALUE,可能会创建数量非常多的线程,甚至OOM。
Examples
Positive example 1:
//org.apache.commons.lang3.concurrent.BasicThreadFactory
ScheduledExecutorService executorService = new ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor(1,
new BasicThreadFactory.Builder().namingPattern("example-schedule-pool-%d").daemon(true).build());
Positive example 2:
ThreadFactory namedThreadFactory = new ThreadFactoryBuilder()
.setNameFormat("demo-pool-%d").build();
//Common Thread Pool
ExecutorService pool = new ThreadPoolExecutor(5, 200,
0L, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS,
new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>(1024), namedThreadFactory, new ThreadPoolExecutor.AbortPolicy());
pool.execute(()-> System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()));
pool.shutdown();//gracefully shutdown
Positive example 3:
<bean id="userThreadPool"
class="org.springframework.scheduling.concurrent.ThreadPoolTaskExecutor">
<property name="corePoolSize" value="10" />
<property name="maxPoolSize" value="100" />
<property name="queueCapacity" value="2000" />
<property name="threadFactory" value= threadFactory />
<property name="rejectedExecutionHandler">
<ref local="rejectedExecutionHandler" />
</property>
</bean>
//in code
userThreadPool.execute(thread);