这篇博客展示了对不同大小文件进行复制操作时，使用多种方法（如Mbb、NIO TransferFrom/To、BufferRead、FastBufferRead和Stream）的性能对比。实验结果显示，缓冲区大小对某些方法的性能有显著影响，尤其是在处理大文件时。例如，对于42MB和350MB的文件，适当增加缓冲区大小可以明显提高复制速度。
测试结果
File :G:/from_42MB.rar ---- Buffer Size : 1024--------------
coypByMbb time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 47
copyByNioTransferFrom time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 62
copyByNioTransferTo time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 47
coypByBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 249
coypByFastBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 188
coypByStream time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 187
File :G:/from_42MB.rar ---- Buffer Size : 4096--------------
coypByMbb time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 15
copyByNioTransferFrom time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 16
copyByNioTransferTo time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 31
coypByBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 125
coypByFastBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 79
coypByStream time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 93
File :G:/from_42MB.rar ---- Buffer Size : 10240--------------
coypByMbb time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 16
copyByNioTransferFrom time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 32
copyByNioTransferTo time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 31
coypByBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 78
coypByFastBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 62
coypByStream time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 63
File :G:/from_350MB.rar ---- Buffer Size : 1024--------------
coypByMbb time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 280
copyByNioTransferFrom time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 453
copyByNioTransferTo time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 7785
coypByBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 8144
coypByFastBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 7068
coypByStream time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 8503
File :G:/from_350MB.rar ---- Buffer Size : 4096--------------
coypByMbb time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 1904
copyByNioTransferFrom time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 5978
copyByNioTransferTo time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 7379
coypByBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 7621
coypByFastBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 7474
coypByStream time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 8200
File :G:/from_350MB.rar ---- Buffer Size : 10240--------------
coypByMbb time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 328
copyByNioTransferFrom time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 6864
copyByNioTransferTo time consumed(buffer size no effect) : 7021
coypByBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 7199
coypByFastBufferRead time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 7941
coypByStream time consumed(buffer size take effect) : 7801
2196
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
