python图像对比处理_python图像预处理库对比

Lycon

A minimal and fast image library for Python and C++.

Lycon is a small subset of optimized image operations derived from OpenCV.

Current set of features include:

Reading and writing JPEG and PNG images

Fast SIMD optimized image resizing

Zero-copy interop with NumPy whenever possible

Tested on:

Linux (Ubuntu 14.04) with Python2.7.6 and 3.5.2.

macOS (Sierra, 10.12) with Python 2.7.11 and 3.5.1.

Install

pip install lycon

Native extension dependencies:

CMake 2.8 or newer

C++ toolchain

LibJPEG

LibPNG

Ubuntu

Single-line command for installing all dependencies:

sudo apt-get install cmake build-essential libjpeg-dev libpng-dev

Anaconda

When working within an Anaconda Python distribution, it is recommended to use the latest cmake version (3.6 or newer). Older versions can lead to a mismatch between the libpng and libjpeg headers used to build Lycon (usually the system headers), and the linked library (which may be preempted by the Anaconda-scoped version). To install the latest cmake version:

conda install cmake

Example

import lycon

# Load an image as a numpy array

img = lycon.load('mittens.jpg')

# Resize the image using bicubic interpolation

resized = lycon.resize(img, width=256, height=512, interpolation=lycon.Interpolation.CUBIC)

# Crop the image (like any regular numpy array)

cropped = resized[:100, :200]

# Save the image

lycon.save('cropped-mittens.png', cropped)

Limitations

Compared to other image processing libraries (OpenCV, pillow, scikit-image), Lycon offers a very limited set of operations. Intended usages include data loaders for deep learning, mass image resizing, etc.

Advantages over OpenCV

Drastically smaller (at the cost of drastically fewer features)

Python module installable via pip

Images use the more common RGB ordering (vs OpenCV’s BGR)

However, if you already have OpenCV installed, Lycon’s advantages are minimal.

Advantages over PIL(low)

Faster

First-class NumPy support

Full support for floating point images

Advantages over Scikit-Image

Drastically faster

Benchmarks

The table below lists execution time (in seconds), averaged across 10 runs

The multiplier next to the time is the relative slowdown compared to Lycon

Operation

Lycon

OpenCV

PIL

Scikit-Image

Upsample: Nearest

0.1944

0.1948 (1x)

2.1342 (11x)

30.8982 (158.9x)

Upsample: Bilinear

0.4852

0.4940 (1x)

7.2940 (15x)

45.9095 (94.6x)

Upsample: Bicubic

1.8162

1.8182 (1x)

8.9589 (4.9x)

120.1645 (66.1x)

Upsample: Lanczos

4.5641

4.5714 (1x)

10.7517 (2.3x)

Upsample: Area

0.4801

0.4931 (1x)

Downsample: Nearest

0.0183

0.0181 (1x)

0.4379 (24.2x)

3.6101 (199.9x)

Downsample: Bilinear

0.0258

0.0257 (1x)

1.3122 (51x)

4.8487 (188.4x)

Downsample: Bicubic

0.1324

0.1329 (1x)

1.8153 (13.7x)

9.4905 (71.6x)

Downsample: Lanczos

0.3317

0.3328 (1x)

2.4058 (7.2x)

Downsample: Area

0.0258

0.0259 (1x)

Read: JPG

0.3409

0.5085 (1.5x)

1.4081 (4.1x)

1.4628 (4.3x)

Read: PNG

1.2114

1.3245 (1.1x)

1.8274 (1.5x)

1.8674 (1.5x)

Write: JPG

0.4760

0.6046 (1.3x)

2.3823 (5x)

5.0159 (10.5x)

Write: PNG

2.1421

2.2370 (1x)

9.0580 (4.2x)

11.6060 (5.4x)

Blank cells indicate that the operation is not supported by the library

All operations performed on a 16k (15360 x 8640) RGB image

Tests performed on Ubuntu 14.04 running on an Intel Core i7 (Skylake)

OpenCV 3.2+ (master: a85b4b5), Pillow 4.0.0, skimage 0.12.3, Python 2.7.3

OpenCV can potentially achieve better performance with GPU implementations and proprietary libraries like Intel IPP

License

All code derived from the OpenCV project is licensed under the 3-clause BSD License.

All Lycon-specific modifications are licensed under the MIT license.

See LICENSE for further details.