mysql count null_你真的了解mysql数据库对like语句处理过程吗

用过sql的同学基本都会过like，但是大家对like了解多少，很多同学可能认知在like条件，如果第一个字符为通配符，sql语句就不会走索引，如果不为通配符，sql语句就会走索引，真相真的是这样的吗，我用实际测试案例来说明。

在mysql5.7数据库上我用sysbench做了一张5000w记录的表来模拟测试，表结构如下

Create Table: CREATE TABLE `sbtest1` (  `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,  `k` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',  `c` char(120) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL DEFAULT '',  `pad` char(60) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL DEFAULT '',  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),  KEY `k_1` (`k`),  KEY `idx_pad` (`pad`)) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=50000001 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin 

like语句基本有如下三种写法

select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '00000005198-22795060602-81061358729%';select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '%00000005198-22795060602-81061358729%';select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '%00000005198-%22795060602-81061358729%';

那我们来看看在数据中这三条语句的执行计划是怎样的

mysql> explain select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '00000005198-22795060602-81061358729%';+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------+| id | select_type | table   | partitions | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra                    |+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------+|  1 | SIMPLE      | sbtest1 | NULL       | range | idx_pad       | idx_pad | 180     | NULL |    1 |   100.00 | Using where; Using index |+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------+1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)mysql> explain select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '%00000005198-22795060602-81061358729%';+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+----------+----------+--------------------------+| id | select_type | table   | partitions | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref  | rows     | filtered | Extra                    |+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+----------+----------+--------------------------+|  1 | SIMPLE      | sbtest1 | NULL       | index | NULL          | idx_pad | 180     | NULL | 49315602 |    11.11 | Using where; Using index |+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+----------+----------+--------------------------+1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)mysql> explain select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '%00000005198-%22795060602-81061358729%';+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+----------+----------+--------------------------+| id | select_type | table   | partitions | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref  | rows     | filtered | Extra                    |+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+----------+----------+--------------------------+|  1 | SIMPLE      | sbtest1 | NULL       | index | NULL          | idx_pad | 180     | NULL | 49315602 |    11.11 | Using where; Using index |+----+-------------+---------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+----------+----------+--------------------------+1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

到这里，是不是颠覆了你的认知，三个写法竟然都是走索引的。这个时候，一定要保持冷静，多问自己几个为什么，为什么会走索引，三个语句的执行计划一样，执行时间是一样的吗。

三种写法，执行计划都是一样，这是因为mysql优化引擎做了很多事情，那三个sql执行时间一样吗，我们来实际测试一下

mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '00000005198-22795060602-81061358729%';+----------+| count(*) |+----------+|        1 |+----------+1 row in set (0.00 sec)mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '%00000005198-22795060602-81061358729%';+----------+| count(*) |+----------+|        1 |+----------+1 row in set (46.04 sec)mysql> select count(*) from sbtest1 where pad like '%00000005198-22795060602%-81061358729%';+----------+| count(*) |+----------+|        1 |+----------+1 row in set (45.94 sec)

从上面结果，可以很明显的看出第一个字符不是通配符的like查询语句效率最高。这是因为第一种写法，mysql引擎只需要对b+tree进行range的范围扫描即可，而第二种和第三种写法，需要将b+tree的节点整个扫描完，才能得到需要的数据，所以时间相差才会这么大。

大家在学习技术或者看技术文章的时候，一定要自己动手去验证，如果发现测试结果不一样，一定要去思考，这样才会走的更远。