oracle的联合索引,oracle 优化之组合索引

组合索引适用场景:

1.适用在单独查询返回记录很多,组合查询后忽然返回记录很少的情况:

比如where 学历=硕士以上 返回不少的记录

比如where 职业=收银员 同样返回不少的记录

于是无论哪个条件查询做索引,都不合适。

可是,如果学历为硕士以上,同时职业又是收银员的,返回的就少之又少了。

于是联合索引就可以这么开始建了。

2.组合查询的组合顺序,要考虑单独的前缀查询情况(否则单独前缀查询的索引不能生效或者只能用到跳跃索引)

比如你在建id,object_type的联合索引时,要看考虑是单独where id=xxx查询的多,还是单独where object_type查询的多。

这里细节就暂时略去了,在案例的部分中还有描述

3.仅等值无范围查询时,组合索引顺序不影响性能(比如where col1=xxx and col2=xxx,无论COL1+COL2组合还是COL2+COL1组合)

drop table t purge;

create table t as select * from dba_objects;

insert into t select * from t;

insert into t select * from t;

insert into t select * from t;

update t set object_id=rownum ;

commit;

create index idx_id_type on t(object_id,object_type);

create index idx_type_id on t(object_type,object_id);

set autotrace off

alter session set statistics_level=all ;

set linesize 366

create index idx_id_type on t(object_id,object_type);

create index idx_type_id on t(object_type,object_id);

set autotrace off

alter session set statistics_level=all ;

set linesize 200

select /*+index(t,idx_id_type)*/ * from t where object_id=20 and object_type='TABLE';

select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'allstats last'));

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SQL_ID  7qydm6x641kx4, child number 1

-------------------------------------

select /*+index(t,idx_id_type)*/ * from  t  where object_id=20  and

object_type='TABLE'

Plan hash value: 1470938839

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                   | Name        | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers |

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |             |      1 |        |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       5 |

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T           |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       5 |

|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_ID_TYPE |      1 |      1 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       4 |

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

2 - access("OBJECT_ID"=20 AND "OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE')

Note

-----

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- cardinality feedback used for this statement

24 rows selected.

可以看出走的是索引范围扫描,并且回表。

--4.组合索引最佳顺序一般是将列等值查询的列置前。

(测试组合索引在条件是不等的情况下的情况,条件经常是不等的,要放在后面,让等值的在前面)

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 1470938839

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                   | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |             |    16 |  3312 |    52   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T           |    16 |  3312 |    52   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_ID_TYPE |    50 |       |    51   (0)| 00:00:01 |

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

2 - access("OBJECT_ID">=20 AND "OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE' AND "OBJECT_ID"<2000)

filter("OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE')

Note

-----

- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

1  recursive calls

0  db block gets

89  consistent gets

0  physical reads

0  redo size

51596  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

875  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

34  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

0  sorts (memory)

0  sorts (disk)

493  rows processed

通过索引快速扫面获得行ID进行回表。

5.注意组合索引与组合条件中关于IN 的优化

案例1

UPDATE t SET OBJECT_ID=20 WHERE ROWNUM<=26000;

UPDATE t SET OBJECT_ID=21 WHERE OBJECT_ID<>20;

COMMIT;

set linesize 1000

set pagesize 1

alter session set statistics_level=all ;

select  /*+index(t,idx1_object_id)*/ * from t  where object_TYPE='TABLE'  AND OBJECT_ID >= 20 AND OBJECT_ID<= 21;

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3420768628

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                   | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |             | 20755 |  4195K|  1186   (1)| 00:00:15 |

|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T           | 20755 |  4195K|  1186   (1)| 00:00:15 |

|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_TYPE_ID | 20755 |       |   218   (0)| 00:00:03 |

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

2 - access("OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE' AND "OBJECT_ID">=20 AND "OBJECT_ID"<=21)

Note

-----

- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

0  recursive calls

0  db block gets

5059  consistent gets

0  physical reads

0  redo size

1191984  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

18464  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

1633  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

0  sorts (memory)

0  sorts (disk)

24472  rows processed

AAffA0nNPuCLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

select  /*+index(t,idx1_object_id)*/ * from t  where object_TYPE='TABLE'  AND OBJECT_ID in (20,21);

AAffA0nNPuCLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

以上两个语句:

select  /*+index(t,idx1_object_id)*/ * from t  where object_TYPE='TABLE'  AND OBJECT_ID >= 20 AND OBJECT_ID<= 21;     --CPU cost消耗1186

select /*+index(t,idx1_object_id)*/ * from t where object_TYPE='TABLE' AND OBJECT_ID in (20,21);               -- CPU cost消耗仅仅为5

为何消耗的CPU成本差距这么大?

在人为的思考中,我们人为认为 (OBJECT_ID >= 20 AND OBJECT_ID<= 21) = in (20,21),而其实oracle 不这么认为in (20,21) 只有两个值,而(OBJECT_ID >= 20 AND OBJECT_ID<= 21)走索引中间有无穷个键值。所以第二句消耗的CPU COST仅仅为5。

6.依然是关于IN的优化 (col1,col2,col3的索引情况,如果没有为COL2赋予查询条件时,COL3只能起到检验作用)

drop table t purge;

create table t as select * from dba_objects;

UPDATE t SET OBJECT_ID=20 WHERE ROWNUM<=26000;

UPDATE t SET OBJECT_ID=21 WHERE OBJECT_ID<>20;

Update t set object_id=22 where rownum<=10000;

COMMIT;

create index idx_union on t(object_type,object_id,owner);

set autotrace traceonly

select * from t where object_type='VIEW' and OWNER='SYS';

select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'allstats last'));

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 1570829420

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                   | Name      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |           |  3369 |   681K|    20   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T         |  3369 |   681K|    20   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_UNION |    14 |       |    19   (0)| 00:00:01 |

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

2 - access("OBJECT_TYPE"='VIEW' AND "OWNER"='SYS')

filter("OWNER"='SYS')

Note

-----

- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

0  recursive calls

0  db block gets

686  consistent gets

0  physical reads

0  redo size

157650  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

3405  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

264  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

0  sorts (memory)

0  sorts (disk)

3938  rows processed

SQL>

23 rows selected.

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3713220770

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                         | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                  |                |  8168 | 16336 |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH| DISPLAY_CURSOR |  8168 | 16336 |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

27  recursive calls

0  db block gets

136  consistent gets

0  physical reads

0  redo size

1925  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

534  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

2  sorts (memory)

0  sorts (disk)

23  rows processed

select /*+INDEX(T,idx_union)*/ * from t T where object_type='VIEW' and OBJECT_ID IN (20,21,22) AND OWNER='SYS';

select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor(null,null,'allstats last'));

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 306189815

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                    | Name      | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |           |  3369 |   681K|     6   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  INLIST ITERATOR             |           |       |       |            |          |

|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T         |  3369 |   681K|     6   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IDX_UNION |     1 |       |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

---------------------------------------------------

3 - access("OBJECT_TYPE"='VIEW' AND ("OBJECT_ID"=20 OR "OBJECT_ID"=21 OR

"OBJECT_ID"=22) AND "OWNER"='SYS')

Note

-----

- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

0  recursive calls

0  db block gets

687  consistent gets

0  physical reads

0  redo size

157650  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

3405  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

264  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

0  sorts (memory)

0  sorts (disk)

3938  rows processed

SQL>

23 rows selected.

Execution Plan

----------------------------------------------------------

Plan hash value: 3713220770

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Id  | Operation                         | Name           | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                  |                |  8168 | 16336 |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |

|   1 |  COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH| DISPLAY_CURSOR |  8168 | 16336 |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------

15  recursive calls

0  db block gets

0  consistent gets

0  physical reads

0  redo size

1862  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client

534  bytes received via SQL*Net from client

3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client

2  sorts (memory)

0  sorts (disk)

23  rows processed

可以看出,select * from t where object_type='VIEW' and OWNER='SYS'; 这一条语句跟select /*+INDEX(T,idx_union)*/ * from t T where object_type='VIEW' and OBJECT_ID IN (20,21,22) AND OWNER='SYS';这一条语句代价等价,因为此案例中object_type='VIEW' 且OBJECT_ID 只有20,21,22 这三条记录,所以如果没有为COL2赋予查询条件时,COL3只能起到检验作用。

  • 0
    点赞
  • 3
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值