本文比较了TRichView和WpTools在实现HTML邮件功能上的表现。TRichView虽然能原生导出HTML，但导入需要第三方库且非商业支持。WpTools提供了可视组件和全面的WYSIWYG编辑，但价格较高。最终，由于成本考虑，选择了存储富文本并在发送时转换为HTML的方式。
We've used TRichView just recently to do HTML email functionality and found it quite adequate. We did evaluate WpTools and it does do exactly what we wanted however for our needs it was just too expensive especially when we always try and purchase site licences.
One thing we did find with WpTools is that it did implement a visual component or set of visual components that you could drop onto a form that implement the whole WYSIWYG UI (e.g. toolbars and such). It took a bit longer with TRichView to achieve the same thing.
Regarding conversion from/to html - TRichView can export html natively, however requires third-party libraries to import html which unfortunately (for us) are not commercially backed (i.e. community driven). So we've resorted to storing all content in RichText natively and only when sending the email do we convert it to html. WpTools has the ability to import/export to html natively.
扫一扫
335
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
