c语言比较大小并交换程序,简单的比较C语言下交换a,b数值的代码效率

以下几个语句都能交换a,b的值

1)

a^=b^=a^=b;

2)

temp = a;

a = b;

b = temp;

3)

a = a^b;

b = a^b;

a = a^b;

效率为2) > 3) > 1)

验证代码如下：(linux下GCC和win下codeblocks通过编译)

#include

#include

#include

void speed_1()

{

long i = 100000000;

while(i){

int a = 10;

int b = 20;

a^=b^=a^=b;

i--;

}

}

void speed_2()

{

long i = 100000000;

int temp = 0;

while(i){

int a = 10;

int b = 20;

temp = a;

a = b;

b = temp;

i--;

}

}

void speed_3()

{

long i = 100000000;

while(i) {

int a = 10;

int b = 20;

a = a^b;

b = a^b;

a = a^b;

i--;

}

}

int main(void)

{

struct timeval start;

struct timeval end;

unsigned long diff_1; //此处的1，2，3数字代表的代码与上面所列一致

unsigned long diff_2;

unsigned long diff_3;

gettimeofday(&start, NULL); //gettimeofday()是C语言获得精确时间函数

speed_1();

gettimeofday(&end, NULL);

diff_1 = 1000000 * (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) + end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec;

gettimeofday(&start, NULL);

speed_2();

gettimeofday(&end, NULL);

diff_2 = 1000000 * (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) + end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec;

gettimeofday(&start, NULL);

speed_3();

gettimeofday(&end, NULL);

diff_3 = 1000000 * (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) + end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec;

printf("time_1 = %ld\n", diff_1);

printf("time_2 = %ld\n", diff_2);

printf("time_3 = %ld\n", diff_3);

return 0;

}

记得以前有人深入的分析过，我也不会，就简单的控制变量看下表面现象，看谁的效率更高些。

等以后在尝试从代码角度进行分析吧。