Many a time I have got an exception saying "the default constructor's implementation is missing". And many a times a parameterized constructor's definition alone does everything. I want to know under which conditions this happens.
解决方案
The compiler doesn't ever enforce the existence of a default constructor. You can have any kind of constructor as you wish.
For some libraries or frameworks it might be necessary for a class to have a default constructor, but that is not enforced by the compiler.
The problem you might be seeing is if you have a class with a custom constructor and you don't have an implicit super() call in your constructor body. In that case the compiler will introduce a call to the super classes default constructor. If the super class doesn't have a default constructor then your class will fail to compile.
public class MyClass extends ClassWithNoDefaultConstructor
public MyClass() {
super(); //this call will be added by the compiler if you don't have any super call here
// if the super class has no default constructor the above line will not compile
// and removing it won't help either because the compiler will add that call
}
}
扫一扫
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
