摘要:
The article discusses the U.S. court case Lor-Mar/Toto Inc. v. 1st Constitution Bank which deals with the bank's liability for forged facsimile signatures. The plaintiff argued that the checks drawn on its account with the bank were not properly payable since they all contained its forged facsimile signatures. A court ruled that the bank is liable for the forged signatures because of the absence of an agreement shifting the burden of loss for such forgeries to the client.
展开