本文研究了在没有写查询的情况下,InnoDB行插入时,因内部临时表的问题而发生性能尖刺的情形。
In this blog post, I investigate a case of spiking InnoDB Rows inserted in the absence of a write query, and find internal temporary tables to be the culprit.
事情发生在我研究一个客户的案例时,在”InnoDB行插入“指标图上,发现了从1k行每秒激增到6K行的尖刺,但却无法和其他活动或者现象连接起来,PMM监控图形上也有同样的反映。
Recently I was investigating an interesting case for a customer. We could see the regular spikes on a graph depicting “InnoDB rows inserted” metric (jumping from 1K/sec to 6K/sec), however we were not able to correlate those spikes with other activity. The innodb_row_inserted graph (picture from PMM demo) looked similar to this (but on a much larger scale):
其他例如句柄和接口的图形都没有显示同样的尖刺,在无法开启general log的情况下,我们尝试检查了所有的日志,performance_schema,触发器,存储过程,预编译语句,甚至包括binlog后发现没有任何单个的写查询语句可以导致每秒插入飙升到6K行。
Other graphs (Com*, Handler) did not show any spikes like that. I’ve examined the logs (we were not able to enable general log or change the threshold of the slow log), performance_schema, triggers, stored procedures, prepared statements and even reviewed the binary logs. However, I was not able to find any single **\write* query which could have caused the spike to 6K rows inserted.
在最后才发现,行插入飙升一定和DML有关的这种想法是错误的,出乎意料的是,尖刺是由于SELECT查询导致的,但为何SELECT查询会导致大量的InnoDB行插入操作呢?