Panel:
Contract Management Issues Related to Insurance, Indemnity and Bonds
in the WM Industry
Co-Chairs:
John
Coffman,
DeNuke
Services, Inc.;
Jim
Gilley,
Wells
Fargo Energy and Environmental
Lead Organizer: John Coffman
Organizers: John Coffman, Jim
Gilley
Panel Reporter: Jim Gilley
The
focus of this panel session will be to provide attendees with an
up-to-date analysis of market conditions and policy forms, necessary
modifications to wrap the financial and insurance protection around
the project contractual and operational risks and a discussion on
project and facility bonding. The risks assumed by companies
working in this business sector are unlike those faced by any other
industry. A keen understanding of risk transfer solutions and
possible contract negotiations is vital to all companies working in
this business sector. The following topics will be covered in
this session:
Overview
of the Current Insurance Status of the Insurance and Surety Bond
Market
An
Understanding of the Underwriting Process – “From Rejection to
Acceptance”
Professional
& Contractors Pollution Legal Liability
Site
Pollution Legal Liability
Contract
Surety – Bid, Performance and Payment Bonds
Financial
Assurance for Radiological Waste Processing
Contract
Rules of Engagement for Insurance and Bonds
“Decisions
Involve Risks”
Panelists
will be recognized leaders having a technical understanding of the
business sector and many years of experience in the development of
corporate risk management insurance and bonding programs.
1:30
PM
SESSION
43
Project
Management Improvements - PlanningThrough
Completion - Scope, Cost & Schedule Control
Co-Chairs:
Christopher
Timm,
PECOS
Management Services;
Gerald
Williams,
Enercon
Services, Inc.
Lead Organizer & Paper Reviewer: Christopher Timm
Organizers: Neil Davis, Gerald Williams, Sherry M. Keeney
Improving
the National Nuclear Laboratory Project Management Capability -
11017
Tim
Tinsley,
Nick Hanigan, National Nuclear Laboratory (United Kingdom)
Project
Management Lessons Learned on US DOE Projects - 11468
Jim
Burritt,Mark
Frei,
Longenecker & Associates
Integrated
Planning: Consolidating Annual Facility Planning — More Time for
Execution - 11562
Jerel
Nelson,
R. Lee Morton, Carlos Ramirez, Carlos Castillo, WorleyParsons
Polestar; James McSwain, Terragraphics; Patrick Morris, National
Security Technologies, LLC
Integration
for Success of Revitalization, Redevelopment, Remedial Activities
and D&D at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory - 11212
William
Biloski,
James Serafin Jr., Oak Ridge National Laboratory
What
is the Impact of Poor Definition of Boundaries and Interfaces on
Projects, and What, If Anything, Should be Done? - 11471
Richard
Peters,
Project Time & Cost UK, Ltd (United Kingdom)
Matching
Funding to Expenses in Federal Programs and Projects - 11360
Vance
Kotrla,Simon
Dekker,
Dekker, Ltd.
Project
Management: Managing a Performance Network of Agreements and
Deliverables - 11251
Laurie
Ford,
Critical Path Consultants
The
Energy Parks Initiative at DOE Oak Ridge, Tennessee Sites -
11328
Sharon
Robinson,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
1:30
PM
SESSION
44
Enhancements
in Vitrification Technology
Co-Chairs:
Gordon
Crawford,
EnergySolutions;
Christian
Ladirat,
CEA
Marcoule
(France)
Lead Organizer: Ned Bibler
Organizers: Gordon Crawford,
Leslie Jardine
Paper Reviewer: Gordon Crawford
Advanced
Joule-Heated Melter Design to Reduce Hanford WTP Operating Costs -
11131
Eric
Smith,
Theresa Butler, Bradley Bowan, Boris Ciorneiu, EnergySolutions
Process
Enhancements to Improve Overall Throughput in the Defense Waste
Processing Facility at the Savannah River Site - 11458
Jonathan
Bricker,
Terri Fellinger, Robert Hopkins, Dale Hutsell, Savannah River
Remediation, LLC; Michael Stone, Brad Pickenheim, David Peeler,
Erich Hansen, Savannah River National Laboratory; Ian Pegg, Marek
Brandys, Robert Mohr, Catholic University of America; Innocent
Joseph, Glenn Diener, Holly Pasieka, Energy Solutions; Wing Kot, The
Catholic University of America
Installation
of Bubblers in the Savannah River Site Defense Waste Processing
Facility Melter - 11136
Michael
Smith,
Dan Iverson, Savannah River Remediation, LLC
Successful
Hot Operation of the German Vitrification Plant VEK – Results and
Experiences - 11277
Joachim
Fleisch,
Franz-Josef Schmitz, WAK GmbH; Wolfgang Gruenewald,
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe; Guenther Roth,; Winfried Tobie, FZK
GmbH (Germany)
The
New Cold Crucible Induction Melter at La Hague - Testing and
Training Strategies to Ensure Successful Startup and Operation of
such Next Generation Vitrification Technology - 11528
Frederic
Bailly,
Eric Prudhon, AREVA NC; Christophe Girold, CEA Marcoule; Benoit
Carpentier, SGN Equeurdreville (France)
A
Milestone in Vitrification: The Replacement of a Hot Metallic Melter
with a Cold Crucible Induction Melter in a Hot Cell in Record Time
at the La Hague Plant, France - 11482
Eric
Chauvin,
Eric Prudhon, Sandrine Naline, AREVA NC; Benoit Carpentier, SGN
Equeurdreville AREVA NC (France)
Limited
increase of Particle Entrainment in the Off-Gas System of a Cold
Crucible Induction Melter, Compared with a Joule-Heated Metal Melter
for HLW Vitrification - 11465
Eric
Tronche,
Christian Ladirat, Virginie Labe, Alain Ledoux, Frederic Angeli, J.
Lacombe, Philippe Gruber, CEA Marcoule; Olivier Pinet, Jean Francois
Hollebecque, CEA; Sandrine Naline, Eric Chauvin, AREVA NC (France)
Vitrification
of High-Level Solutions Rich in Molybdenum in the Cold Crucible
Melter Process - 11502
Olivier
Pinet,Jean
Francois Hollebecque,
CEA; Frederic Angeli, Philippe Gruber, CEA Marcoule; Sandrine
Naline, AREVA NC, Inc. (France)
1:30
PM
SESSION
45
Operational
Efficiency in TRU Waste Management
Co-Chairs:
Terry
Wickland,
Nuclear
Filter Technology;
Betty
Humphrey,
Weston
Solutions, Inc.
Lead Organizer: Roger Nelson
Organizer & Paper
Reviewer: Terry Wickland
The
Operational Importance of Radiological Improvement in Remote Handled
Transuranic Waste Processing at the Idaho Clean-up Project. -
11055
Scott
Anderson,
Tammy Hobbes, Gary Lusk, CH3M-WG Idaho, LLC; Alan Jines, William
Lattin, Edward Ziemianski, US DOE
Customer
Service Model for Waste Tracking at Los Alamos National Laboratory -
11329
Alison
Dorries,
Andrew Ashbaugh, Andrew Montoya, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Managing
Hanford’s Legacy, No-Path-Forward Waste to Disposition - 11445
Ty
Blackford,
Renee Catlow, Don Flyckt, CH3M HILL Plateau Remediation Company
Waste and Fuel Management; Mike Waters, Cavanagh Services Group,
Inc.; Don Moak, Richard Grondin, Perma-Fix Environmental Services
Inc; Lori West, Materials and Energy Corporation, CH3M HILL Plateau
Remediation Company Solid Waste Processing Project
The
Role of Acceptable Knowledge in Transuranic Waste Disposal
Operations - 11117
Christopher
Chancellor,
Los Alamos National Laboratory - Carlsbad Operations; Roger Nelson,
US DOE
Terminating
Safeguards on Excess Special Nuclear Material: Defense TRU Waste
Clean-up and Non-proliferation - 11538
Timothy
Hayes,
Los Alamos National Laboratory; Roger Nelson, US DOE
Project
Strategy for the Remediation and Disposition of Legacy Transuranic
Waste at the Savannah River Site - 11232
Mary
Rodriguez,
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions
Alpha
Gamma Hot Cell Facility De-Inventory, a Tale of Two Projects -
11316
Daniel
Pancake,
Michael Sodaro, Argonne National Laboratory
Lessons
Learned in the De-Inventory Process for the Alpha Gamma Hot Cell
Facility at Argonne National Laboratory - 11115
Janie
Johnston,
Argonne National Laboratory
1:30
PM
SESSION
46
Panel:
Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - LLW Disposal Issues
Co-Chairs:
C.
Clint Miller,
Pacific
Gas & Electric;
Mark
Carver,
Entergy
Services, Inc.
Lead Organizer & Panel Reporter: C. Clint Miller
Organizer: Mark Lewis
This
panel will focus on US waste disposal. It provides the
opportunity for representatives of US commercial LLW disposal
facilities to update managers of radioactive waste at nuclear power
plants on disposal site access and services provided. The status
of a proposed new site will also be presented.
Proposed
Panelists include: Jeff
Gardner,
Site
Vice President, Clive Disposal Site, EnergySolutions;Bill
Dornsife,
Vice
President Regulatory Affairs, Waste Control Specialists;
Mark
Carver,
Manager,
Fleet LLW, Entergy Services;
Lisa
Edwards,
Radwaste
Program Manager, EPRI and
Bill
House,
Vice
President, Chem-Nuclear.
3:15
PM
SESSION
47
Panel:
Nuclear Power Plant Waste Management - LLW Processor Issues
Co-Chairs:
Mark
Lewis,
EnergySolutions;
Mark
Carver,
Entergy
Services, Inc.
Lead Organizer & Panel Reporter: Mark Lewis
This
panel will focus on US waste processors and provides the opportunity
for representatives of US fixed-based processing facilities to update
managers of radioactive waste at nuclear power plants, on service and
facility changes and improvements. Fixed-based processing
facilities provide a variety of waste volume reduction, treatment,
and disposal services to help nuclear power waste generators to cost
effectively and efficiently disposition low-level radioactive waste
within commercially regulated guidelines. Processors are
continuously changing and improving on services, which necessitate
periodic updates to stay abreast.
Proposed
Panelistsinclude:
Brian
Wood,
Vice
President, LP&D, EnergySolutions;John
Hagn,
Sales
Manager, Perma-Fix Services;Greg
Broda,
Vice
President, Impact Services;Steve
Ferguson,
Sales
Manager, Alaron Services and
David
Wise,
Operations
Vice President, Studsvik.
1:30
PM
SESSION
48
Waste
Certification, Acceptance and Disposal for LLW, ILW and Special
Nuclear Material
Co-Chairs:
Heinz
Kroeger,
TÜV
NORD EnSys Hannover
(Germany);
Richard
Krett,
DeNuke
Services
Lead Organizer & Paper Reviewer: Heinz Kroeger
Development,
Qualification, and Disposal of Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW)
Forms at the Handford Site and Throughout the DOE Complex -
11031
James
Edge,
Terry Sams, Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC
Cementitous
Barriers Partnership Accomplishments and Relevance to the US DOE
Complex - 11443
Christine
Langton, Greg Flach, Savannah River National Laboratory;Heather
Burns,
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions; David Kosson, Kevin Brown,
Vanderbilt University; Linda Suttora, Pramod Mallick, US DOE; David
Esh, Jacob Philip, US NRC; Edward Garboczi, National Institute of
Standards Technology; Eric Samson, SIMCO Technologies, Inc.
(Canada); H Van Der Sloot, JCL Meeussen, Energy Research Centre of
the Netherlands (The Netherlands)
Impact
of Recovery Act Funding on Waste Disposal Operations at the Nevada
Test Site - 11120
Dona
Merritt, Navarro-Intera;Jhon
Carilli,
US DOE; John Wrapp, Rick Wagner, NSTec; Katie Tanaka, National
Security Technologies, LLC
Intentional
Mixing of Special Nuclear Materials to meet Waste Acceptance
Criteria - 11387
Heath
Downey,
MACTEC; John Conant, ABB Inc.
3:15
PM
SESSION
49
Pollution
Prevention/Waste Minimization for LLW, ILW, MW, NORM and TENORM
Co-Chairs:
John
Briest,
Weaver
Boos Consultants LLC;
Mike
Eisenhower,
Materials
& Energy Corporation
Lead Organizer: Gabriele Bandt
Organizers: Holger Spann,
Lance Mezga
Paper Reviewer: Holger Spann
Development
of an Integrated Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental
Surveillance Program at Dalat Nuclear Research Institute -
11166
Phuong
Tran, Nuclear Research Institute (Vietnam); Harvey Laura Kay,Joan
F. Hughes,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Minimizing
Risks to the Environment from Using NORM Residues in Road
Construction - 11076
Vanusa
Maria Jacomino,
Paulo Heilbron, Fabiana Dias, Maria Helena Taddei, Brazilian
National Commission of Nuclear Energy (Brazil)
Effect
of Concentration of Hydrogen Chloride Gas on Chlorination Treatment
of Waste Antimony-Uranium Composite Oxide Catalyst - 11274
Kayo
Sawada,
Youichi Enokida, EcoTopia Science Institute, Nagoya University
(Japan)
Study
of the Treatment of the Liquid Radioactive Waste Nong Son Uranium
Ore Processing - 11204
Tien
Nguyen,
Institute for Technology of Radioactive and Rare Elements (Vietnam);
Laura Harvey, UT-Battelle
1:30
PM
SESSION
50
Waste
Characterization for LLW, ILW, MW - Non-Measurement Topics
Co-Chairs:
David
Eaton,
CH3M-WG
Idaho, LLC;
Heinz
Kroeger,
TÜV
NORD EnSys Hannover
(Germany)
Lead Organizer & Paper Reviewer: Heinz Kroeger
Organizer:
Frazier Bronson
Acceleration
of B&W Y-12 ARRA Project: Characterization and Disposition
Mapping Strategies - 11209
Joseph
Birchfield,
Alliant Corporation
Innovative
Characterization Strategies B&W Y-12 ARRA CERCLA Old Salvage
Yard - 11217
Brad
Mattie,
B&W Y-12
Evaluation
of Uncertainties of Radiological Characteristics by Means of a Mix
of Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches - 11025
Timothy
Soetens,
Sophie Cauchies, Saïd Ben Ayad, ONDRAF/NIRAS (Belgium)
Development
of a Scaling Factor Estimation Program for Low-Level Radioactive
Waste - 11427
Taewook
Kim,
Nara Lee, Sung Jun Maeng, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Engineering
Institute (Korea)
3:15
PM
SESSION
51
Waste
Characterization for ILW, LLW, HLW - Ionizing Radiation Measurement
Methods
Co-Chairs:
Frazier
Bronson,
Canberra
Industries Inc - AREVA Group;
Stephen
Croft,
Los
Alamos National Laboratory
Lead Organizer: Heinz Kroeger
Organizer & Paper
Reviewer: Frazier Bronson
Application
of Spectral Summing to Indeterminate Suspect Low-Level Drums at Los
Alamos National Laboratory - 11249
Kathleen
Gruetzmacher, John Veilleux, Los Alamos National Laboratory;Randy
Lucero,
James Seamans, Martin Clapham, Pajarito Scientific Corporation
A
Comparison of Measurement Uncertainty for the Case of Non-Uniform
Source Distribution Between Rotating Boxes and Stationary Boxes with
Multiple Detector Locations - 11182
Henrik
Jäderström,
Canberra Solutions AB (Sweden); Frazier Bronson, Canberra Industries
Inc - AREVA Group
Efficiency
Optimization Employing Random and Smart Search using Multiple Counts
and Line Activity Consistency Benchmarks - 11398
Andrey
Bosko,
Nabil Menaa, Frazier Bronson, Ram Venkataraman, Canberra Industries
Inc - AREVA Group; Tim Spillane, Canberra Industries (AREVA BUNM);
Wilhelm Mueller, Canberra Industries
Mini-Tomographic
Gamma Scanner for Radioactive Waste Assay of Small Items -
11399
Haori
Yang,
Marcel Villani, B M Young, Jeff Lagana, Robert Zakrzewski, Kara
Morris, Susan Kane-Smith, Ram Venkataraman, Canberra Industries Inc
- AREVA Group; Wilhelm Mueller, Canberra Industries
1:30
PM
SESSION
52
Accelerated
Deactivation and Decommissioning of Facilities
Co-Chairs:
Jas
Devgun,
Sargent
& Lundy, LLC;
Philippe
Guiberteau,
CEA’s
Nuclear Energy Directorate
(France)
Lead Organizer: Maria Lindberg
Organizers: Jas Devgun, Andrew
Szilagyi
Paper Reviewer: Jas Devgun
Review
of EHS&Q Across Decommissioning at Sellafield and Overview of
the Effective Management of Radiation Dose within Decommissioning at
Sellafield - 11294
Jack
Williamson,
Sellafield Ltd (United Kingdom)
Signature
Research on Legacy Management and Decommissioning at the National
Nuclear Laboratory, United Kingdom - 11588
Anthony
Banford,
National Nuclear Laboratory (United Kingdom)
The
DIAMOND University Consortium: Decommissioning, Immobilisation and
Management of Nuclear Waste for Disposal - 11097
Simon
Biggs,
Michael Fairweather, James Young, University of Leeds; Nick Evans,
Loughborough University; William Lee, Imperial College London
(United Kingdom)
Safe
and Compliant approach to First-of-a-Kind Demolition at the Hanford
Site - 11434
Kurt
Kehler,
CH3M HILL Plateau Remediation Company
Irradiated
Graphite Waste Treatment - 11174
Gerard
Laurent,
EDF (France)
A
Technical Basis for the Selection of Area vs. Volume Criteria for
Contaminated Structures - 11003
A.
Nardi,
Todd S Brautigam, ENERCON Services, Inc.
Immobilization
of Cesium Traps from the BN-350 Fast Reactor (Aktau, Kazakhstan) -
11062
David
Wells,
Nuvia Limited (United Kingdom)
The
Establishment of the Waste Management Plan as a Component of
Cernavoda NPP Decommissioning Plan, an Important Step for the
Nuclear Power Development in Romania - 11185
Gheorghe
Barariu,
National Authority for Nuclear Activity (Romania); Roxana Georgescu,
Raluca Fako, Florin Sociu, RAAN-SITON (Romania)
1:30
PM
SESSION
53
ER
Pre-Closure Challenges- Using Risk Data and Considering Future Land Use
Co-Chairs:
Moses
Jaraysi,
CH3M
HILL Plateau Remediation Company;
Matt
McCormick,
US
DOE
Lead Organizer: Angie Jones
Organizers: Moses Jaraysi, Matt
McCormick
Paper Reviewer: Moses Jaraysi
The
Role of Future Land Use in Environmental Decision Making at Three
DOE Mega-Cleanup Sites: Rocky Flats, Mound and Fernald - 11595
Marc
Jewett,
FluorGovernment Group; Moses Jaraysi, CH3M HILL Plateau Remediation
Company
Hanford
Site Central Plateau Cleanup Completion Strategy: Mapping the Path
to Efficient and Effective Cleanup - 11456
Dale
McKenney,
CH3M-Hill Plateau Remediation Company
New
Science and Newer Risk Assessment Policy: Updates to the US EPA
Superfund Risk and Dose Assessment Models - 11570
Stuart
Walker,
US EPA
Balancing
Cleanup and Future Land Use at the Idaho National Laboratory -
11186
David
Hutchison,
Frank Webber, CH3M-WG Idaho, LLC
Remediation
Issues and Solutions with Co-Located Chemical and Radiological
Contaminants - 11296
Eugene
Shephard,
Peter Collopy, Nelson Walter, Heath Downey, MACTEC; Elaine Hammick,
ABB Inc.
Savannah
River Site - Incorporating Risk and Land Use into Site "Area
Completion" Remedial Decisions - 11409
Karen
Guevara,
US DOE
Decision
Framework for Applying Attenuation Processes to Metals and
Radionuclides - 11234
Dibakar
(Dib) Goswami, Washington State Department of Ecology;Carl
Spreng,
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Challenges
to Establish Final Action Cleanup Decisions for the Hanford Site
River Corridor - 11592
Jeff
Lerch,
Washington Closure Hanford
1:30
PM
SESSION
54
Visitor
Centers and Other Public-Education Tools
Co-Chairs:
Judith
Connell,
Fluor
Government Group;
Helen
Belencan,
US
DOE - Savannah River
Lead Organizer & Paper Reviewer: Judith Connell
Organizers: Elizabeth Bowers, Helen Belencan, Jim Walther
PSEG's
Energy & Environmental Resource Center - 11083
Lisa
Barile,
PSEG Power, LLC
The
Weldon Spring Site Interpretive Center: Lessons Learned from the
First Ten Years - 11338
Jane
Powell,
US DOE Office of Legacy Management; Yvonne Deyo, Melissa Lutz, S.M.
Stoller Corporation
Y-12
National Security Complex's New Hope Center - Our "Front Door"
for Public Access and Educational Information - 11158
Ray
Smith,
B&W Y-12
Hanford’s
Public Tour Program – An Excellent Educational Tool - 11439
Karen
Sinclair,
Mission Support Alliance-Hanford
Environmental
Cleanup: The Next Chapter in the Oak Ridge Story - 11326
Jenny
Freeman,
Strata-G; John Eschenberg, US DOE; Cathy Hickey, URS Corporation
Regional
Stakeholder Education Through the Nuclear Workforce Initiative -
11101
Mindy
Mets,
SRS Community Reuse Organization
Nuclear
Energy & Radioactive Waste: The Perception of the Youngsters, A
Study Through the Educational Workshops Conducted by the "Visiatome"
Information Center at the CEA Marcoule (France) - 11530
Cedric
Garnier,
CEA Marcoule (France)
The
National Museum of Nuclear Science & History; Statistics,
Issues, Successes After Year Number Two of Operation as a Public
Interaction Option - 11048
Jim
Walther,
National Museum of Nuclear Science & History
1:30
PM
POSTER
SESSION55
Topic
A:Fission
Products, Actinide Monitoring and Remediation
Co-Chairs:
Susan
Walter,
AECOM;
Scott
Warner,
AMEC
Lead Organizer: Susan Walter
Paper Reviewer: Scott Warner
Uranium
Toxicity to Native Microbial Communities in the Hanford 300 Area
Groundwater - 11345
Denny
Carvajal,
Florida International University; Andrew A. Plymale, Allan Konopka,
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Biological
Immobilization of Dissolved Uranium - 11578
Seung
Yeop Lee,
Min-Hoon Baik, Jong Won Choi, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute
(Korea)
Analysis
of Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring around Korean LILW
Disposal Facility - 11492
Juyoul
Kim,
FNC Technology Co.; Seungyoung Jeong, Korea Institute of Nuclear
Safety (Korea)
Transfer
of Zirconium, Niobium and Molybdenum from Soil to Edible Parts of
Crops - 11254
Shigeo
Uchida,
Keiko Tagami, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Japan)
Status
of Environmental Radiation Monitoring in Vietnam: Present and Future
- 11315
Giap
Trinh,
Long Nguyen, Phan Ngo, Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology
(Vietnam)
Some
Considerations on Water-to-Fish Transfer Data Collected in Japan for
Radionuclides and Stable Elements - 11252
Keiko
Tagami,
National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Japan); Shigeo Uchida,
National Institute of Radiological Sciences (Japan)
Environmental
Remediation - 11123
Long
Nguyen,
Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology (Vietnam)
Topic
B: Assessment, Planning and Implementation of Project Remediation
Activities
Co-Chairs:
David
Wallace,
CDM;
Vickie
Maranville,
AMEC
Earth & Environmental, Inc.
Lead Organizer: David Wallace
Paper Reviewer: Vickie
Maranville
Use
of the AMS Helicopter Emergency Response Acquisition Systems with
GIS for Radioactive Soil Remediation - 11504
Chris
Brock,
CH3M HILL Plateau Remediation Company
Cleaning
Up and Preventing Future Nuclear Legacies at Oak Ridge National
Laboratory - 11412
Dirk
Van Hoesen,
UT-Battelle
Pre-Project
Activities Related to the Remediation of Fissionable Materials
Contained in Standpipes at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited’s
Whiteshell Laboratories - 11033
Terence
Stepanik,
Jason Martino, Jamie Edworthy, Shamsul Alam, Alex Man Heidi
McIlwain, Atomic Energy Of Canada Limited; Peter Taylor, Acsion
Industries Ltd (Canada)
Environmental
Restoration of Corrective Action Unit 408 Bomblet Target Area at
Tonopah Test Site, Nevada (American Reinvestment and Recovery Act
Funded) - 11114
Dona
Merritt, Navarro-Intera;Kevin
Cabble,
US DOE - NNSA/NSO; Mark Krauss, Stoller-Navarro; Mark Burmeister,
NNES
Conceptual
Model for Hanford 242-Z Area Soil Disposal Sites and the Hanford
Soil Inventory Model (SIM) - 11565
Stephen
Agnew,
Columbia Energy & Environmental Services, Inc.; Sunil Mehta,
INTERA
Determining
Corrective Action Boundaries at Nevada Test Site Aerially-Dispersed
Radiological Release Sites - 11155
Dona
Merritt, Navarro-Intera; Patrick Matthews, Navarro Nevada
Environmental Services;Lynn
Kidman,
Stoller-Navarro; Kevin Cabble, US DOE - NNSA/NSO
ERDF
Supercells 9 & 10: A Case Study/Comparison in Constructability
and Cost Reduction through Re-Design - 11324
John
Briest,
Weaver Boos Consultants LLC; William Borlaug, Washington Closure
Hanford, LLC
Microbial
Community Profiling for Vadose Zone Remediation - 11454
Ann
Miracle, Fred Tilton, Dawn Wellman,Amoret
Bunn,
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
The
Power of Data Imaging - 11614
Jeffrey
Lively,
MACTEC
Advancing
“Natural” In Situ Remediation for Treatment of Radionuclides in
Groundwater - 11621
Scott
Warner,
AMEC
Topic
C: Emerging Approaches to Wastewater Treatment and Reducing
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Co-Chairs:
Angie
Jones,
AMEC
Earth & Environmental;
Srini
Neralla,
PIKA
International, Inc.
Lead Organizer: Angie Jones
Paper Reviewer: Srini Neralla
Distillation:
Waste-Water Treatment for Release to Sewers - 11067
Jung
Bae,
Eckert & Ziegler Isotope Products
Simulation
of Flow and Mercury Transport in Upper East Fork Poplar Creek, Oak
Ridge, TN - 11361
Siamak
Malek-Mohammadi,
Elsa Cabrejo, Georgio Tachiev, David Roelant, Reinaldo
Garcia-Martinez, Amy Cook, Florida International University
Parametric
Study of the Building Protection Factor at Decommissioning Sites -
11063
Sami
Sherbini,
US NRC
A
Green Complex: Setting the Stage for a Future Mission - 11354
Lisa
Lockrem,
URS Corporation; James Hedin, Washington TRU Solutions, LLC; Roger
Nelson, US DOE
Application
of Kenaf to Biofiltration of Wastewater and Contaminated Water for
Removal of Heavy Metals - 11349
Fengxiang
X. Han,
Yi Su, David Monts, Mississippi State University
Mid-Columbia
Energy Initiative: Making Hanford Cleanup Green - 11371
Gary
Petersen, TRIDEC;Bruce
Covert,
Washington Closure Hanford - URS
Overview
of US DOE Office of Legacy Management Applied Science and Technology
Program - 11347
Jalena
Dayvault,
US DOE; Stan Morrison, Jody Waugh, S.M. Stoller Corporation
Topic
D: Planning, Characterization and Remediation of Toxic Metals
Co-Chairs:
Mark
Frei,
Longenecker
& Associates;
Dawn
Kaback,
AMEC
Geomatrix
Lead Organizer: Mark Frei
Paper Reviewer: Dawn Kaback
Kinetic
Study of Mercury Biodegradation in a Packed Bed Reactor -
11175
Ranjana
Chowdhury,
Sanjukta Ghoshal, Jadavpur University (India)
Formation
and Characterization of Iron-Phosphate Precipitates: Relevance to
the Groundwater Remediation at DOE-Hanford Site - 11569
Prabhakar
Pant,
Reinier Hernandez, Leonel Lagos, Florida International University
Analysis
of Beryllium in Samples by Optical Fluorescence: Method Adaptation
for Field Analysis and for High Throughput Analysis - 11467
Anoop
Agrawal,
Lori Adams, John Cronin, Juan Carlos Tonazzi, Berylliant Inc
Investigation
of the Effect of Uranium on Microbial Surfaces using Atomic Force
Microscopy - 11422
Rakesh
Guduru,
Denny Carvajal, Yelena Katsenovich, Leonel Lagos, Florida
International University
Lessons
Learned - UFP QAPP Development - 11313
Steve
Howard,
MD Rahman, Cabrera Services, Inc.
Topic
E: Public Communication, Participation, Education and Training
Co-Chairs:
Elizabeth
Bowers,
Jeff
Frey,
US
DOE
Lead Organizer & Paper Reviewer: Elizabeth Bowers
National
Nuclear Science Week: A New Way to Broaden Our Communication Impact
- 11047
Jim
Walther,
National Museum of Nuclear Science & History
Allowing
Enlarged Participation of the Stakeholders in Decision Making
Related to Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Through
Reversibility and Retrievability - 11187
Jean-Noel
Dumont, Jean-Michel Hoorelbeke,Gérald
Ouzounian,
ANDRA (France)
Safe
Community Co-Existence with Long-Term Low-Level Radioactive Historic
Waste Contamination in Canada – Port Hope Example - 11314
Mark
Gardiner,
AECL (Canada)
The
Role of the Northern New Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board (NNMCAB) in
Assuring the Protection of the Environment from Legacy Spills at Los
Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) - 11368
C.
Mason,
Research Applications Corporation; Gerry Maestas, Ralph Phelps,
Northern New Mexico Citizens Advisory Board
The
Need for Open Source Books for Nuclear Workforce Training -
11384
Joshua
Peterson,
University of Texas
Perceptions
of Native Americans and Caucasians Interviewed at the Fort Hall
Reservation about Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Resources
to be Restored - 11386
Joanna
Burger,
Rutgers University; Charles Powers, Vanderbilt University; Michael
Gochfeld, CRESP
Mitigating
Future Workforce Risk through the Education of Young Children -
11551
Joni
Martin,
AREVA Federal Services LLC; Laura Clise, AREVA Inc.
Community-based
Solid Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: Case study, Cameroon -
11480
Eugene
Asi,
Günter Busch, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus
(Germany)
Virtual
Facility Tours as a Communication Tool - 11581
Laurence
Pernot,
Jan Phillips, AREVA Federal Services, LLC
Topic
F: Security, Safety and Safeguards
Co-Chairs:
Kim
Auclair,
KD
Auclair & Associates, LLC;
Charles
Waggoner,
Mississippi
State University
Lead Organizer & Paper Reviewer: Kim Auclair
How
to Manage your Data, Instead of your Data Managing you: Lessons from
Dr. Deming’s Red Bead Experiment - 11430
Steven
Prevette,
Fluor / Savannah River Nuclear Solutions; Anthony Umek, SRNS
Choosing
Leading Indicators and Learning from the Results - 11431
Steven
Prevette,
Fluor / Savannah River Nuclear Solutions; Anthony Umek, SRNS
Tracking
and Monitoring Nuclear Material and Waste Packages by Using RFID
Technology - 11230
Brian
Craig,
Yung Liu, Hanchung Tsai, Kun Chen, Argonne National Laboratory
Safety
and Industrial Hygiene Practices for a Highly Enriched Uranium
Remediation Project - 11402
Peter
Collopy,
MACTEC
March
2, Wednesday AM
8:30
AM
SESSION
56
Panel:
US DOE Procurement and Contracting Opportunities
Co-Chairs:
John
Longenecker,
Longenecker
& Associates, Inc.;
Cathy
Hickey,
URS
Corporation
Lead Organizer & Panel Reporter: Cathy Hickey
Organizers:
John Longenecker
This
session will be open to all WM2011 Exhibitors.
This
panel will focus on the procurement process and what lessons have
been learned and best practices have been developed by US DOE and
NNSA over the last year. Senior DOE Contracting Officials will
share their visions.
Proposed
Panelists include senior officials from US DOE Office of Procurement
and Assistance Management; EM Office of Acquisition and Contract
Management; the NNSA Small Business Program and the SRO Office of
Contracts Management.
10:15
AM
SESSION
57
Panel:
US DOE Contractor's Procurement and Contracting Opportunities
Co-Chairs:
Roger
Merrick,
E2
Consulting Engineers, Inc.;
Michael
Davidson,
Tidewater,
Inc.
Lead Organizer: John Coffman
Organizers: Roger Merrick,
Michael Davidson
Panel Reporter: Michael Davidson
This
panel session will focus on Procurement and Contracting Opportunities
with the US DOE’s Prime Contractors. DOE encourages it's prime
contractors to obtain goods and services from small and disadvantaged
businesses. Award fee is based partially on the contractor’s
success in achieving specific goals for subcontracts with small and
disadvantaged businesses. Goods and services being considered
for subcontracting include the following: decontamination and
decommissioning services, remediation services, transportation and
disposal of radioactive waste, health physics equipment and services,
emergency response planning and training, lab services, R&D
products, waste treatment services, maintenance services, A/E
services and professional consulting.
Proposed
Panelists will include Contracting Officers from the major DOE
Contractors. It complements Session 56 which focuses on
contracting activity directly with the DOE. This
session is also open to all WM2011 Exhibitors.
8:30
AM
SESSION
58
Crosscutting
Filtration Systems in the Nuclear Industry
Co-Chairs:
Charles
Waggoner,
Mississippi
State University;
Chris
Chadwick,
Porvair
Filtration Group, Microfiltrex Division
(United
Kingdom)
Lead Organizer & Paper Reviewer: Charles Waggoner
Organizer:
Chris Chadwick
AG-1
HEPA Filters, A Comparison of Configurations - 11604
Andrew
Stillo,
Camfil Farr
High
Efficiency Particulate Air Filter Quality Assurance - 11586
Jan
Fretthold,
Julie Stormo, Christopher Hart, Dave Crosby, Air Techniques
International
Factors
to Consider to Avoid Problems in High Efficiency Particulate Air
Filter Applications - 11585
Jan
Fretthold,
Air Techniques International
Evaluation
of ASME AG-1 Section FK Radial Flow HEPA (High Efficiency
Particulate Air) Filters - 11287
Paxton
Giffin,
Michael Parsons, Charles Waggoner, Mississippi State University;
Jamie Rickert, Institute for Clean Energy Technology
10:15
AM
SESSION
59
Panel:
US DOE - Energy Facility Contractors Group's (EFCOG) Knowledge Portal
Review
Co-Chairs:
Joseph
Yanek,
Fluor
Government Group;
Susan
Stiger,
Bechtel
National, Inc.
Lead Organizer: John Longenecker
Organizer & Panel
Reporter: Mark Frei
This
panel will focus
on the various areas of EFCOG. EFCOG promotes excellence in all
aspects of the operation, management and integration of US DOE
facilities in a safe, environmentally sound, efficient and cost
effective manner through the ongoing exchange of information on
lessons learned. The purpose of this knowledge portal is to provide a
vehicle to allow members to keep abreast of the latest news, issues,
and events across the DOE complex; for the sharing of innovative
ideas and practices and to collaborate virtually on the development
and implementation of new processes and practices.
A
short discussion of EFCOG history and accomplishments will be
followed by an overview of Working Groups (WGs) and critical updates
to include selected topics from the areas of Project Management,
Integrated Safety Management, Quality Assurance,
Environment/Safety/Health, Acquisition
Management, Waste Management, Contractor Assurance, Engineering
Practices, Safety Analysis, Energy and Infrastructure, Safeguards and
Security, Human Capital and Decontamination & Decommissioning.
8:30
AM
SESSION
60
Panel:
Disposal of Large Quantities of Depleted Uranium - Role of Site
Specific Performance Assessment
Co-Chairs:
Larry
Camper,
US
NRC;
Christine
Gelles,
US
DOE
Lead Organizer: Larry Camper
Panel Reporter: Boby Abu-Eid
This
panel focuses on the large quantities of depleted uranium in the US
which will need to be disposed in the next several years. The US NRC
has decided to pursue Rulemaking to require a site specific
performance assessment for disposal of unique waste streams including
large quantities of depleted uranium. The NRC Rulemaking will
also identify the technical parameters to be evaluated within the
performance assessment. The panel will discuss this complex
topic including suggestions for conducting the performance
assessment.
10:15
AM
SESSION
61