摘要：
For such an immature field, there have been a remarkable number of review articles on tsunami sedimentology and geomorphology. The earliest of these would be Coleman (1968; also 1978). The majority of reviews have been written by Alastair Dawson--one of the modern pioneers--and co-authors (e.g., Dawson, 1994; Dawson, 1996; Dawson and Shi, 2000; Dawson and Stewart, 2007). Some syntheses (e.g., Bryant, 2001; Kelletat and Scheffers, 2003) include broad and untested speculation, some of which is pointed out in Dominey-Howes et al. (2006; also see Dominey-Howes, 2007), who review the various geological signatures of modern and paleo tsunamis. One review (Shanmugam, 2006) focuses on terminology and on the relationship between tsunamis and turbidity currents. Rhodes et al. (2006) summarize some of the observations and conclusions from a 2005 International Workshop on Tsunami Deposits. Several symposium publications and special volumes have been published with some focus on tsunami geology, the earliest being in Marine Geology (Einsele et al., 1996). For example, a publication spike in the year 2000 (Figure 3.2) is largely due to three special volumes that appeared that year.
展开
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
