java的集合映射,Java 8基本流到集合的映射方法

Is there any significant difference (in performance or best practices) between those two stream creation methods?

int[] arr2 = {1,2,3,4,5,6};

Arrays.stream(arr2)

.map((in)->in*2)

.mapToObj((in) -> new Integer(in))

.collect(Collectors.toCollection(()-> new ArrayList<>()));

Arrays.stream(arr2)

.map(in->in*2)

.boxed()

.collect(Collectors.toCollection(()-> new ArrayList<>()));

EDIT

Thanks to Stack Community answers I can add some addons to question completeness for new readers:

As many pointed out, .boxed() IntStream method is defined as:

@Override

public final Stream boxed() {

return mapToObj(Integer::valueOf);

}

What basically re-defines issue to which one of following is better:

.mapToObj(in -> new Integer(in))

or

.mapToObj(in -> Integer.valueOf(in))

解决方案

Yes, boxed() uses Integer.valueOf which can retrieve some Integer instances from a cache.

So you should either use the version with boxed() (preferably), or use Integer.valueOf instead of new Integer(). Note that boxed() is in fact shorthand for mapToObj(Integer::valueOf).

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值