与Linux的SO_BINDTODEVICE套接字选项的问题(Problems with SO_BINDTODEVICE Linux socket option)

转载至： http://www.it1352.com/350493.html

I have been looking into this for a while after seeing conflicting answers to how SO_BINDTODEVICE is actually used. Some sources claim that the correct usage is to pass in a struct ifreq pointer, which has the device name and index obtained via an ioctl. For example:

struct ifreq ifr;

memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(struct ifreq));

snprintf(ifr.ifr_name, sizeof(ifr.ifr_name), "eth0");

ioctl(fd, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr);

setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE,  (void*)&ifr, sizeof(struct ifreq));

 

Where as Beej's networking tutorial says to pass the device name as a char pointer. For example:

char *devname = "eth0";

setsockopt(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_BINDTODEVICE, devname, strlen(devname));

 

 

I have tried both of these methods and they both do what is required, but I wanted to note that the device index obtained in the first method is superfluous. If you look at the kernel code in net/core/sock.c, sock_bindtodevice just copies the device name string, calls dev_get_by_name_rcu to get the device and binds to it.

The reason that the first approach works is that the device name is the first element in the ifreq structure, see http://linux.die.net/man/7/netdevice.