1.google protocal buffer:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/linux/l-cn-gpb/
http://www.cnblogs.com/stephen-liu74/archive/2013/01/02/2841485.html
2.Google FlatBuffer:
http://google.github.io/flatbuffers/md__benchmarks.html
3.Cap’n Proto
http://kentonv.github.io/capnproto/encoding.html
以下是性能比较:
| FlatBuffers (binary) | Protocol Buffers LITE | Rapid JSON | FlatBuffers (JSON) | pugixml | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decode + Traverse + Dealloc (1 million times, seconds) | 0.08 | 302 | 583 | 105 | 196 |
| Decode / Traverse / Dealloc (breakdown) | 0 / 0.08 / 0 | 220 / 0.15 / 81 | 294 / 0.9 / 287 | 70 / 0.08 / 35 | 41 / 3.9 / 150 |
| Encode (1 million times, seconds) | 3.2 | 185 | 650 | 169 | 273 |
| Wire format size (normal / zlib, bytes) | 344 / 220 | 228 / 174 | 1475 / 322 | 1029 / 298 | 1137 / 341 |
| Memory needed to store decoded wire (bytes / blocks) | 0 / 0 | 760 / 20 | 65689 / 4 | 328 / 1 | 34194 / 3 |
| Transient memory allocated during decode (KB) | 0 | 1 | 131 | 4 | 34 |
| Generated source code size (KB) | 4 | 61 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Field access in handwritten traversal code | typed accessors | typed accessors | manual error checking | typed accessors | manual error checking |
| Library source code (KB) | 15 | some subset of 3800 | 87 | 43 | 327 |

本文介绍了三种流行的序列化库:Google Protobuf、Google FlatBuffer和Cap’n Proto,并提供了相关链接和性能比较。
4585

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



