Spring AOP源码分析（五）Spring AOP的Cglib代理

[size=medium]上一篇文章介绍了Spring AOP的JDK动态代理的过程，这一篇文章就要介绍下Spring AOP的Cglib代理过程，仍然是使用上一篇文章的工程案例。

JDK动态代理是由JdkDynamicAopProxy来生成代理对象的，Cglib则是由CglibAopProxy来生成代理对象的。JdkDynamicAopProxy、CglibAopProxy实现了AopProxy接口，如下：[/size]

public interface AopProxy {

	Object getProxy();

	Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader);

}

[size=medium]然后详细看下CglibProxy的代理对象的生成过程。CglibProxy、JdkDynamicAopProxy都拥有一个非常重要的属性AdvisedSupport advised这个属性包含了拦截的配置信息，这个属性在JdkDynamicAopProxy中已经说过了，不再详细说明。[/size]

public Object getProxy(ClassLoader classLoader) {
		if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
			logger.debug("Creating CGLIB proxy: target source is " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
		}
		try {
//此时的rootClass为BServiceImpl
			Class<?> rootClass = this.advised.getTargetClass();
			Assert.state(rootClass != null, "Target class must be available for creating a CGLIB proxy");

			Class<?> proxySuperClass = rootClass;
//这里判断rootClass是否是Cglib代理所产生的类（内部判断rootClass的className是否包含$$）,对于本工程肯定不符合，跳过
			if (ClassUtils.isCglibProxyClass(rootClass)) {
				proxySuperClass = rootClass.getSuperclass();
				Class<?>[] additionalInterfaces = rootClass.getInterfaces();
				for (Class<?> additionalInterface : additionalInterfaces) {
					this.advised.addInterface(additionalInterface);
				}
			}
//验证proxySuperClass中的是否有final方法（仅仅是打印出来警告信息，不做任何处理）
			// Validate the class, writing log messages as necessary.
			validateClassIfNecessary(proxySuperClass);

			// Configure CGLIB Enhancer...
			Enhancer enhancer = createEnhancer();
			if (classLoader != null) {
				enhancer.setClassLoader(classLoader);
				if (classLoader instanceof SmartClassLoader &&
						((SmartClassLoader) classLoader).isClassReloadable(proxySuperClass)) {
					enhancer.setUseCache(false);
				}
			}
			enhancer.setSuperclass(proxySuperClass);
			enhancer.setInterfaces(AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised));
			enhancer.setNamingPolicy(SpringNamingPolicy.INSTANCE);
			enhancer.setStrategy(new UndeclaredThrowableStrategy(UndeclaredThrowableException.class));

			Callback[] callbacks = getCallbacks(rootClass);
			Class<?>[] types = new Class<?>[callbacks.length];
			for (int x = 0; x < types.length; x++) {
				types[x] = callbacks[x].getClass();
			}
			// fixedInterceptorMap only populated at this point, after getCallbacks call above
			enhancer.setCallbackFilter(new ProxyCallbackFilter(
					this.advised.getConfigurationOnlyCopy(), this.fixedInterceptorMap, this.fixedInterceptorOffset));
			enhancer.setCallbackTypes(types);

			// Generate the proxy class and create a proxy instance.
			return createProxyClassAndInstance(enhancer, callbacks);
		}
		//略
	}

[size=medium]上述内容，就是使用Enhancer设置下要继承的父类、设置下要实现的接口、设置下回调然后就创建出代理对象。其中的一个重要的回调Callback为DynamicAdvisedInterceptor，在DynamicAdvisedInterceptor的intercept方法里面实现了和JDK动态代理同样类似的逻辑。
接下来我们看下这一拦截过程是如何实现的。在DynamicAdvisedInterceptor的intercept方法里：[/size]

@Override
		public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
			Object oldProxy = null;
			boolean setProxyContext = false;
			Class<?> targetClass = null;
			Object target = null;
			try {
				if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
					// Make invocation available if necessary.
					oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
					setProxyContext = true;
				}
				// May be null. Get as late as possible to minimize the time we
				// "own" the target, in case it comes from a pool...
				target = getTarget();
				if (target != null) {
					targetClass = target.getClass();
				}
				List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
				Object retVal;
				// Check whether we only have one InvokerInterceptor: that is,
				// no real advice, but just reflective invocation of the target.
				if (chain.isEmpty() && Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) {
					// We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly.
					// Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor, so we know
					// it does nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot
					// swapping or fancy proxying.
					retVal = methodProxy.invoke(target, args);
				}
				else {
					// We need to create a method invocation...
					retVal = new CglibMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain, methodProxy).proceed();
				}
				retVal = processReturnType(proxy, target, method, retVal);
				return retVal;
			}
			finally {
				if (target != null) {
					releaseTarget(target);
				}
				if (setProxyContext) {
					// Restore old proxy.
					AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
				}
			}
		}

[size=medium]上面和JDK动态代理一样也是分两大步，第一步获取一个拦截器链，第二步创建一个MethodInvocation来执行这个拦截器链。
第一步：和JDK动态代理获取拦截器链的过程一样的。
第二步：它创建的MethodInvocation是CglibMethodInvocation，它是继承了JDK动态代理所创建的ReflectiveMethodInvocation，覆写了ReflectiveMethodInvocation的invokeJoinpoint方法。ReflectiveMethodInvocation的invokeJoinpoint方法内容如下：[/size]

protected Object invokeJoinpoint() throws Throwable {
		return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.target, this.method, this.arguments);
	}

[size=medium]就是利用反射进行目标方法的调用执行。
再看下CglibMethodInvocation的invokeJoinpoint方法：[/size]

protected Object invokeJoinpoint() throws Throwable {
			if (this.publicMethod) {
				return this.methodProxy.invoke(this.target, this.arguments);
			}
			else {
				return super.invokeJoinpoint();
			}
		}

[size=medium]this.publicMethod就是说明所调用的方法是否是public类型的。我们来看下它的来历：[/size]

public CglibMethodInvocation(Object proxy, Object target, Method method, Object[] arguments,
				Class<?> targetClass, List<Object> interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers, MethodProxy methodProxy) {
			super(proxy, target, method, arguments, targetClass, interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers);
			this.methodProxy = methodProxy;
			this.publicMethod = Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers());
		}

[size=medium]在构建CglibMethodInvocation这个MethodInvocation时进行赋值的。Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers());就是判断该方法是否是public类型的。
CglibMethodInvocation与ReflectiveMethodInvocation仅仅在执行目标方法的时候有所不同，当目标方法是public方法时，ReflectiveMethodInvocation一直采用反射的策略执行目标方法。而CglibMethodInvocation却使用this.methodProxy.invoke(this.target, this.arguments)代理方法来执行。看下它的好处的描述（CglibMethodInvocation的invokeJoinpoint()方法的注释）：[/size]

/**
		 * Gives a marginal performance improvement versus using reflection to
		 * invoke the target when invoking public methods.
		 */
		@Override
		protected Object invokeJoinpoint() throws Throwable {
//略
}

[size=medium]当执行public方法时，会比反射有一个更好的性能。然而当我们在使用cglib的callback的时候却还是使用反射，没有去使用MethodProxy。因此我们还是按照源码的使用方式来使用，来提升性能。
本文章中许多步骤省略了，是因为在上一篇SpringAOP JDK的动态代理文章中都进行了详细介绍，同时许多的接口也在上上一篇文章SpringAOP的接口说明中给出了详细的说明。[/size]