SolrCloud你值得拥有，性能表现良好

转贴请声明原文： http://blog.csdn.net/duck_genuine/article/details/8644412

solrCloud的压力测试：

上一篇文章提过使用solr3.6做的架构优化。solr 搜索架构优化

测试的时候还没有做更大数据量的并发请求压测试，最近来了新机器，比之前更加好，但没想要把索引放内存，而是放在ssd，内存是满 足的，但使用高于线上2倍多请求的时候，响应就没有之前那么良好，有下降的趋势，即使再加多8个core顶住 ，表现还是差差的。

先看一下非分多结点的测试数据：

4020832
#50ms以下	2735841 ,68.04%
#50ms -100ms	364699 ,9.07%
#100ms -200ms	401903 ,10.00%
#200ms -300ms	191195 ,4.76%
#300ms -500ms	156065 ,3.88%
#500-1000	139782 ,3.48%
#1000-2000	20087 ,0.50%
#2000-3000	11218 ,0.28%
#3000-5000	41 ,0.00%
#5000-以上	1 ,0.00%

基于3.6.1设计的多结点测试数据：8结点＊2 双备负载

响应时间	1122万请求	1184万  请求数	983万请求
#50ms以下	9032936 ,80.44%	9859400 ,83.25%	8492507 ,86.39%
#50ms -100ms	730948 ,6.51%	816640 ,6.90%	566203 ,5.76%
#100ms -200ms	679844 ,6.05%	751707 ,6.35%	555547 ,5.65%
#200ms -300ms	218665 ,1.95%	198764 ,1.68%	129092 ,1.31%
#300ms -500ms	166813 ,1.49%	104998 ,0.89%	55841 ,0.57%
#500-1000	173188 ,1.54%	52902 ,0.45%	21114 ,0.21%
#1000-2000	44532 ,0.40%	11318 ,0.10%	268 ,0.00%
#2000-3000	180387 ,1.61%	42332 ,0.36%	9754 ,0.10%
#3000-5000	923 ,0.01%	3565 ,0.03%	2 ,0.00%
#5000-以上	428 ,0.00%	597 ,0.01%	0 ,0.00%

加双倍压力测试，并且再多加4结点负载。总共是（8*3），负载看一下效果：

响应时间	总量 1970万 =	6985110  +	6355850  +	6362254
#50ms以下	13824099 ,70.16%	4570760 ,65.44%	4625922 ,72.78%	4627417 ,72.73%
#50ms -100ms	1397816 ,7.09%	595075 ,8.52%	400213 ,6.30%	402528 ,6.33%
#100ms -200ms	1433964 ,7.28%	711878 ,10.19%	360096 ,5.67%	361990 ,5.69%
#200ms -300ms	655878 ,3.33%	318562 ,4.56%	169003 ,2.66%	168313 ,2.65%
#300ms -500ms	764824 ,3.88%	298421 ,4.27%	232987 ,3.67%	233416 ,3.67%
#500-1000	802516 ,4.07%	261791 ,3.75%	269960 ,4.25%	270765 ,4.26%
#1000-2000	263937 ,1.34%	148634 ,2.13%	57885 ,0.91%	57418 ,0.90%
#2000-3000	538667 ,2.73%	74715 ,1.07%	231570 ,3.64%	232382 ,3.65%
#3000-5000	21222 ,0.11%	5274 ,0.08%	8040 ,0.13%	7908 ,0.12%
#5000-以上	285 ,0.00%	0 ,0.00%	170 ,0.00%	115 ,0.00%

当然这其中还是可以再做优化，不过再看一下solrCloud请求表现：

同样是双倍的压力请求：但却只有8*2的结点负载。cpu表现稳定，且请求响应分值更佳，暂时只测试跑一会，没跑长时间的数据。取了阶段性的数据，依然保持90%是在100ms以下，而且没有看到几个机器负载彪高的趋势 .

响应时间	2563693	2606345	2898226
#50ms以下	2168196 ,84.57%	2207154 ,84.68%	2449177 ,84.51%
#50ms -100ms	173866 ,6.78%	175126 ,6.72%	195621 ,6.75%
#100ms -200ms	167391 ,6.53%	168675 ,6.47%	190621 ,6.58%
#200ms -300ms	29169 ,1.14%	29557 ,1.13%	33537 ,1.16%
#300ms -500ms	10453 ,0.41%	10755 ,0.41%	12169 ,0.42%
#500-1000	7348 ,0.29%	7592 ,0.29%	8556 ,0.30%
#1000-2000	1887 ,0.07%	1947 ,0.07%	2354 ,0.08%
#2000-3000	5297 ,0.21%	5450 ,0.21%	6102 ,0.21%
#3000-5000	86 ,0.00%	89 ,0.00%	89 ,0.00%
#5000-以上	0 ,0.00%	0 ,0.00%	0 ,0.00%

暂时还没有测试并行读写的时候的性能。

转贴请声明原文： http://blog.csdn.net/duck_genuine/article/details/8644412