软件版本的研究（MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH），从apr得到的信息

最新推荐文章于 2024-09-12 09:39:45 发布

#Page#

最新推荐文章于 2024-09-12 09:39:45 发布

阅读量6.9k

点赞数 1

分类专栏：嵌入式/Linux/C语言文章标签： application patch function deprecated library api

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/lanmanck/article/details/7783924

版权

嵌入式/Linux/C语言专栏收录该内容

139 篇文章 7 订阅

订阅专栏

当我们需要开发软件时，有时候对于软件版本会比较头痛，那是因为没有严格的规章制度作为度量。今天看到一篇文章，介绍apr的，其中的版本控制很有将就，于是贴出部分内容与各位共同学习下。需要肯定的是，老外在一些流程管理和过程监管方面的经验（或称之为技术）确实很先进，而不仅仅是纯粹编程技术上的先进，学习别人的长度才能更好的提升自己：

以下摘自：http://blog.csdn.net/tingya

1.2 APR版本规则

由于Apache组织的目标是将APR独立出来形成单独的第三方库，因此对其而言稳定的API接口就成为一个非常重要的必须考虑的方面。不过由于APR需要不断的往前方展，因此API接口的变化又是必然的趋势，因此如何平衡稳定性和变化性是APR开发者面临的一个极需解决的问题。为此APR采用了严格的版本规则来实现这一点。用户只需要简单的判断APR版本号，就可以很容易确定当前版本的兼容性：向前兼容、向后兼容还是前后同时兼容。

1.2.1版本概述

APR中使用三个整数来记录APR版本号：MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH。MAJOR表示当前APR的主版本号，它的变化通常意味着APR的巨大的变化，比如体系结构的重新设计，API的重新设计等等，而且这种变化通常会导致APR版本的向前不兼容。MINOR称之为APR的次版本号，它通常只反映了一些较大的更改，比如APR的API的增加等等，但是这些更改并不影响与旧版本源代码和二进制代码之间的兼容性。PATCH通常称之为补丁版本，通常情况下如果只是对APR函数的修改而不影响API接口的话都会导致PATCH的变化。

目前为止APR的最高版本是1.2.2，最早遵循这种规则的版本号是0.9.0，不过在0.9.0之前，APR还推出了两个版本a8和a9。不过有一点需要注意的是，我们后面描述的版本规则并不适合1.0.0以前的版本。对于1.0.0以前的版本(0.x.y)，APR提供的API是可以任意的改变而没有任何的限制，因此这些版本的变化不遵循后面描述的版本规则。从1.0.0以后的所有版本都遵循。切记。

除非主版本号发生变化，否则如果某个应用程序使用了低版本的APR，那么如果将该版本用高版本的APR替代，应用程序必须能够无错误的编译通过，通常我们称之为前向兼容行；反之很明显，如果应用程序中使用了高版本的APR，那么如果将该版本用低版本的APR替代，则未必能够编译通过，通常我们称之为后向不兼容。

APR的发展中力图总是保持与旧版本的源代码和二进制版本之间的兼容性。通过源代码兼容，应用程序就可以在使用新版本的APR进行编译的时候不会报错，这样应用程序就不需要为了适应新的APR而做出调整，从而保持应用开发的一致性和持续性。除非APR的主版本号发生变更。这种兼容性反之则不成立。如果一个应用程序使用较高的MINOR版本开发，那么很明显，如果将该版本替换为MINOR相对较低的版本进行编译，则成功的可能性应该不是很大。

除了源代码方面的兼容性，APR还希望能够保持二进制之间的兼容性。通过保持二进制兼容，应用程序可以直接使用高版本的APR库(或者是DLL，或者使so文件)替换低版本的库文件，而不需要做任何修改，就可以链接成功。与源代码兼容一样，二进制的兼容也是向前兼容，而不保证向后兼容。

下面的表格演示了APR的版本规则策略：

原始版本	新版本	兼容性	原因
2.2.3	2.2.4	前后兼容	PATCH版本号的变化保持前向和后向兼容
2.2.3	2.2.1	前后兼容	PATCH版本号的变化保持前向和后向兼容
2.2.3	2.3.1	向前兼容	次版本号的变化保持向前兼容，但并不保持向后兼容
2.2.3	2.1.7	不兼容	次版本号的降低不能保证向后兼容
2.2.3	3.0.0	不兼容	主版本号的变化不保证兼容性
2.2.3	1.4.7	不兼容	主版本号的变化不保证兼容性

1.2.2版本策略

为了控制APR接口的稳定，APR制定了严格的版本变化策略。

1.2.2.1PATCH版本策略

在前表中我们看到，PATCH的变化并不影响版本的源代码和二进制级别的兼容性，包括向前和向后兼容，因此，我们很容易看出，PATCH版本变化通常意味着对版本的修修补补，即BUG的修复。这些工作通常被局限于函数内部的修改，或者是API函数内部，或者是APR内部static函数的变化。任何对API的增加、修改、删除都是不允许的。

1.2.2.1次版本号策略

任何新函数，新变量以及新常量的引入以及任何现有函数的废除都将可能导致次版本号的变化：

1)、新函数的引入

An application coded against an older minor release will still have all of its functions available with their original signatures. Once an application begins to use a new function, however, they will be unable to work against older minor versions.

It is tempting to say that introducing new functions might create incompatibility across minor releases. If an application takes advantage of an API that was introduced in version 2.3 of a library, then it is not going to work against version 2.2. However, we have stated that an any application built against version 2.2 will continue to work for all 2.x releases. Thus, an application that states "requires 2.3 or later" is perfectly acceptable -- the user or administrator simply upgrades the installed library to 2.3. This is a safe operation and will not break any other application that was using the 2.2 library.

In other words, yes an incompatibility arises by mandating that a specific version needs to be installed. But in practice, this will not be a problem since upgrading to newer versions is always safe.

2)、新常量的引入

Similar to functions, all of the original (old) constants will be available to an application. An application can then choose to use new constants to pick up new semantics and features.

3)、函数替换

This gets a bit trickier. The original function must remain available at the link-level so that an application compiled against a minor version will continue to work with later minor versions. Further, if an application is designed to work with an earlier minor version, then we don't want to suddenly change the requirements for that application. This means that the headers cannot silently map an old function into a newer function, as that would turn an application, say, based on 1.2 into an application requiring the 1.4 or later release.

This means that functions cannot truly be replaced. The new, alternate function can be made available in the header and applications can choose to use it (and become dependent upon the minor release where the function appears).

It is possible to design a set of headers where a macro will always refer to the "latest" function available. Of course, if an application chooses to use this macro, then the resulting compiled-binary will be dependent upon whatever version it was compiled against. This strategy adds the new functionality for applications, yet retains the necessary source and binary compatibility for applications designed or built against previous minor releases.

Constants (enumerated values and preprocessor macros) are not allowed to change since an older application will still be using them. Similarly, function signatures at the link-level may not change, so that support for older, compiled applications is maintained.

4)、函数作废

随着APR的升级，APR中的一些API可能将作废，不再使用，但是这些API并不能从APR库中移除。因为一旦API被移除，向后兼容性将被破坏。因此我们能够做的仅仅是宣布其作废。

If you deprecate a function in APR, please mark it as such in the function documentation, using the doxygen "/deprecated" tag. Deprecated functions can only be removed in major releases.

A deprecated function should remain available through the original header. The function prototype should remain in the same header, or if moved to a "deprecated functions" header, then the alternate header should be included by the original header. This requirement is to ensure that source compatibility is retained.

Finally, if you are deprecating a function so that you can change the name of the function, please use the method described above under "Replacing functions", so that projects which use APR can retain binary compatibility.

Note that all deprecated functions will be removed at the next major version bump.

1.2.2.3主版本号策略

下面的任何一种变化都将可能导致主版本号的变化：

1)、常量的移除或者更改

2)、函数移除或者作为

3)、fold together macro-ized function replacements

1.2.3版本检查

由于APR严格的版本控制策略，使得应用程序在使用APR库之前必须能够检测使用的APR库的版本号。APR允许在编译以及使用APR的时候检测它的版本号。

1.2.3.1 编译时版本检查

Libraries should make their version number available as compile-time constants. For example:

#define FOO_MAJOR_VERSION 1

#define FOO_MINOR_VERSION 4

#define FOO_PATCH_VERSION 0

The above symbols are the minimum required for this specification.

An application that desires, at compile-time, to decide on whether and how to use a particular library feature needs to only check two values: the major and the minor version. Since, by definition, there are no API changes across patch versions, that symbol can be safely ignored. Note that any kind of a check for a minimum version will then pin that application to at least that version. The application's installation mechanism should then ensure that that minimal version has been installed (for example, using RPM dependency checks).

If the feature changes across minor versions are source compatible, but are (say) simply different choices of values to pass into the library, then an application can support a wider variety of installed libraries if it avoids compile-time checks.

1.2.3.2 执行时版本检查

A library meeting this specification should support a way for an application to determine the library's version at run-time. This will usually be emboded as a simple function which returns the MAJOR, MINOR, and PATCH triplet in some form.

Run-time checks are preferable in all cases. This type of check enables an application to run against a wider variety of minor releases of a library (the application is "less coupled" to a particular library release). Of course, if an application requires a function that was introduced in a later, minor release, then the application will require that, at least, that release is installed on the target system.

Run-time checks are particurly important if the application is trying to determine if the library has a particular bug that may need to be worked around, but has been fixed in a later release. If the bug is fixed in a patch release, then the only avenue for an application is to perform a runtime check. This is because an application cannot require a specific patch level of the library to be installed -- those libraries are perfectly forward and backwards compatible, and the administrator is free to choose any patch release, knowing that all applications will continue to function properly. If the bug was fixed in a minor release, then it is possible to use a compile-time check, but that would create a tighter coupling to the library.

1.2.3.3 版本API

与前面的版本规则定义一致，APR中定义了数据结构apr_version_t来描述版本规则：

typedef struct {

int major; /**< major number */

int minor; /**< minor number */

int patch; /**< patch number */

int is_dev; /**< is development (1 or 0) */

} apr_version_t;

major是当前APR版本的主版本号，minor则是次版本号，patch对应的则是APR的补丁号。es_dev则描述了当前APR库的状态：开发版还是发行版，分别对应1和0。

一旦定义了apr_version_t结构，APR就将使用它作为基本的版本控制单位。APR中提供了函数apr_version和apr_version_string分别设置和返回APR的版本。

APR_DECLARE(void) apr_version(apr_version_t *pvsn)

{