ARGUMENT常用论证句式
1. The mere fact that ticket sales in recent years for screenplay-based movies have exceeded for book-based movies is insufficient evidence to conclude that writing screenplays now provides greater financial opportunity for writers.
2. The argument simply equates success with movie ticket sales, which is unwarranted.(错误类比,差异概念)
3. The author provides no evidence that the realism of color photography is the reason for its predominance.
4. Lacking more specific information about how these other employees responded, it is impossible to access the reliability of the survey’s results or to make an informed recommendation.
5. The editorial fails to take into account possible differences between East and West Cambia that are relevant to how drivers react to speed-limit changes.(错误类比)
6. While it is true that many voters change their minds several times before voting, and that some remain undecided until entering the voting booth, this is not true of everyone.
7. Unless the author can demonstrate that the city will incur expenses that are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects, the author’s concern about these issues is unfounded.
8. The author fails to consider and rule out other factors that might account for proportional decreases in spending on food.
9. Unless the original cast and production team are involved in making the sequel, there is a good chance it will not be financially successfully.
10. Comprehensive analysis is necessary to identify the actual causes of the company’s lowered profitability.(可用于首)
11. Therefore, any decision aimed at addressing the problem of falling circulation must be based on more thorough investigation to gather sufficient data in order to narrow down and locate the actual causes of the problem.(可用于尾)
12. From the survey quoted in the argument, however, we find no sign of such procedures of random sampling, and have good reason to doubt if the sample is representative enough to reflect the general attitudes of all workers as a whole.(批评取样过程不够规范)
13. The problem is that two situations are not similar enough to justify the analogical deduction.(批评错误类比)