53. Maximum Subarray

Quesition

Find the contiguous subarray within an array (containing at least one number) which has the largest sum.

For example, given the array [−2,1,−3,4,−1,2,1,−5,4],
the contiguous subarray [4,−1,2,1] has the largest sum = 6.

More practice:
If you have figured out the O(n) solution, try coding another solution using the divide and conquer approach, which is more subtle.

思路一(蛮力法)
代码
public class Solution {
    public int maxSubArray(int[] nums) {
        int maxSum = nums[0];
        int curSum = 0;
        for(int i = 0;i < nums.length;i++){
            for(int j = i;j < nums.length;j++){
                for(int k = i;k <= j;k++){
                    curSum += nums[k];
                }
                if(curSum > maxSum)
                        maxSum = curSum;
                curSum = 0;
            }
        }
        return maxSum;
    }
}
结果及分析

超时了

思路二(七月的方法,动态规划)

事实上可以令currSum是以当前元素结尾的最大连续数组的和,maxSum是全局的最大子数组的和,当从前往后遍历时,对第j个元素有两种选择,要么放入当前的数组,要么作为数组的第一个元素;如currSum > 0,则把当前元素放入子序列;如果currSum < 0,则把currSum置为当前元素;

代码
public class Solution {
    public int maxSubArray(int[] nums) {
        int maxSum = nums[0];
        int curSum = 0;
        for(int right = 0;right < nums.length;right++){
            if(curSum > 0)
                curSum += nums[right];
            else
                curSum = nums[right];
            if(curSum > maxSum)
                maxSum = curSum;
        }
        return maxSum;
    }
}
 结果及分析

时间复杂度为O(n),空间复杂度为O(1),已经是最优的结果了。

二刷解法I

跟七月的解法差不多,如果当前sum为负,就sum置为当前的数组元素,如果为证则加上当前数组元素。其中隐含的原理是如果前面的和为负就没有必要再继续加上去了,加上去也是越来越小。这实际上是一种动态规划的思想。

code
public class Solution {
    public int maxSubArray(int[] nums) {
        if(nums == null || nums.length == 0)
            return 0;
        int sum = 0;
        int maxSum = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
        for(int i = 0;i < nums.length;i++){
            if(sum < 0)
                sum = nums[i];
            else
                sum += nums[i];
            maxSum = Math.max(maxSum,sum);
        }
        return maxSum;
    }
}
二刷解法II

leetcodeDISCUSS

this problem was discussed by Jon Bentley (Sep. 1984 Vol. 27 No. 9 Communications of the ACM P885)

the paragraph below was copied from his paper (with a little modifications)

algorithm that operates on arrays: it starts at the left end (element A[1]) and scans through to the right end (element A[n]), keeping track of the maximum sum subvector seen so far. The maximum is initially A[0]. Suppose we’ve solved the problem for A[1 .. i - 1]; how can we extend that to A[1 .. i]? The maximum
sum in the first I elements is either the maximum sum in the first i - 1 elements (which we’ll call MaxSoFar), or it is that of a subvector that ends in position i (which we’ll call MaxEndingHere).

MaxEndingHere is either A[i] plus the previous MaxEndingHere, or just A[i], whichever is larger.

CODE
public static int maxSubArray(int[] A) {
    int maxSoFar=A[0], maxEndingHere=A[0];
    for (int i=1;i<A.length;++i){
        maxEndingHere= Math.max(maxEndingHere+A[i],A[i]);
        maxSoFar=Math.max(maxSoFar, maxEndingHere); 
    }
    return maxSoFar;
}
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值