Spring Security3源码分析-FilterSecurityInterceptor分析

FilterSecurityInterceptor过滤器对应的类路径为
org.springframework.security.web.access.intercept.FilterSecurityInterceptor
这个filter是filterchain中比较复杂，也是比较核心的过滤器，主要负责授权的工作
在看这个filter源码之前，先来看看spring是如何构造filter这个bean的
具体的构造过程的代码片段为

    //这个方法源自HttpConfigurationBuilder类
    void createFilterSecurityInterceptor(BeanReference authManager) {
        //判断是否配置了use-expressions属性
        boolean useExpressions = FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSourceParser.isUseExpressions(httpElt);
        //根据intercept-url标签列表创建授权需要的元数据信息。后面仔细分析
        BeanDefinition securityMds = FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSourceParser.createSecurityMetadataSource(interceptUrls, httpElt, pc);

        RootBeanDefinition accessDecisionMgr;
        //创建voter列表
        ManagedList<BeanDefinition> voters =  new ManagedList<BeanDefinition>(2);
        //如果是使用了表达式，使用WebExpressionVoter
        //没使用表达式，就使用RoleVoter、AuthenticatedVoter
        if (useExpressions) {
            voters.add(new RootBeanDefinition(WebExpressionVoter.class));
        } else {
            voters.add(new RootBeanDefinition(RoleVoter.class));
            voters.add(new RootBeanDefinition(AuthenticatedVoter.class));
        }
        //定义授权的决策管理类AffirmativeBased
        accessDecisionMgr = new RootBeanDefinition(AffirmativeBased.class);
        //添加依赖的voter列表
        accessDecisionMgr.getPropertyValues().addPropertyValue("decisionVoters", voters);
        accessDecisionMgr.setSource(pc.extractSource(httpElt));

        // Set up the access manager reference for http
        String accessManagerId = httpElt.getAttribute(ATT_ACCESS_MGR);
        //如果未定义access-decision-manager-ref属性，就使用默认的
         //AffirmativeBased
        if (!StringUtils.hasText(accessManagerId)) {
            accessManagerId = pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(accessDecisionMgr);
            pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(accessDecisionMgr, accessManagerId));
        }
        //创建FilterSecurityInterceptor过滤器
        BeanDefinitionBuilder builder = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(FilterSecurityInterceptor.class);
        //添加决策管理器
        builder.addPropertyReference("accessDecisionManager", accessManagerId);
        //添加认证管理类
        builder.addPropertyValue("authenticationManager", authManager);

        if ("false".equals(httpElt.getAttribute(ATT_ONCE_PER_REQUEST))) {
            builder.addPropertyValue("observeOncePerRequest", Boolean.FALSE);
        }
        //添加授权需要的安全元数据资源
        builder.addPropertyValue("securityMetadataSource", securityMds);
        BeanDefinition fsiBean = builder.getBeanDefinition();
        //向ioc容器注册bean
        String fsiId = pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(fsiBean);
        pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(fsiBean,fsiId));

        // Create and register a DefaultWebInvocationPrivilegeEvaluator for use with taglibs etc.
        BeanDefinition wipe = new RootBeanDefinition(DefaultWebInvocationPrivilegeEvaluator.class);
        wipe.getConstructorArgumentValues().addGenericArgumentValue(new RuntimeBeanReference(fsiId));

        pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(wipe, pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(wipe)));

        this.fsi = new RuntimeBeanReference(fsiId);
    }

现在再仔细分析创建元数据资源的bean过程

    static BeanDefinition createSecurityMetadataSource(List<Element> interceptUrls, Element elt, ParserContext pc) {
        //创建Url处理类，有两个实现：AntUrlPathMatcher、RegexUrlPathMatcher
        UrlMatcher matcher = HttpSecurityBeanDefinitionParser.createUrlMatcher(elt);
        boolean useExpressions = isUseExpressions(elt);
        //解析intercept-url标签，构造所有需要拦截url的map信息
         //map中的key：RequestKey的bean定义，value：SecurityConfig的bean定义
        ManagedMap<BeanDefinition, BeanDefinition> requestToAttributesMap = parseInterceptUrlsForFilterInvocationRequestMap(
                interceptUrls, useExpressions, pc);
        BeanDefinitionBuilder fidsBuilder;

        if (useExpressions) {
            //定义表达式处理类的bean
            Element expressionHandlerElt = DomUtils.getChildElementByTagName(elt, Elements.EXPRESSION_HANDLER);
            String expressionHandlerRef = expressionHandlerElt == null ? null : expressionHandlerElt.getAttribute("ref");

            if (StringUtils.hasText(expressionHandlerRef)) {
                logger.info("Using bean '" + expressionHandlerRef + "' as web SecurityExpressionHandler implementation");
            } else {
                BeanDefinition expressionHandler = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(DefaultWebSecurityExpressionHandler.class).getBeanDefinition();
                expressionHandlerRef = pc.getReaderContext().generateBeanName(expressionHandler);
                pc.registerBeanComponent(new BeanComponentDefinition(expressionHandler, expressionHandlerRef));
            }
            //定义表达式类型的FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource
            fidsBuilder = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(ExpressionBasedFilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource.class);
            //通过构造函数注入依赖
            fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(matcher);
            fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(requestToAttributesMap);
            fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgReference(expressionHandlerRef);
        } else {
            //定义非表达式类型的FilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource
            fidsBuilder = BeanDefinitionBuilder.rootBeanDefinition(DefaultFilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource.class);
            //通过构造函数注入依赖
            fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(matcher);
            fidsBuilder.addConstructorArgValue(requestToAttributesMap);
        }

        fidsBuilder.addPropertyValue("stripQueryStringFromUrls", matcher instanceof AntUrlPathMatcher);
        fidsBuilder.getRawBeanDefinition().setSource(pc.extractSource(elt));

        return fidsBuilder.getBeanDefinition();
    }

通过以上的bean构造过程，FilterSecurityInterceptor所依赖的决策管理器、认证管理器、安全元数据资源都具备了，该让FilterSecurityInterceptor干活了，其源码为

    public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain)
            throws IOException, ServletException {
        //封装request, response, chain，方便参数传递、增加代码阅读性
        FilterInvocation fi = new FilterInvocation(request, response, chain);
        invoke(fi);
    }

    public void invoke(FilterInvocation fi) throws IOException, ServletException {
        if ((fi.getRequest() != null) && (fi.getRequest().getAttribute(FILTER_APPLIED) != null)
                && observeOncePerRequest) {
            if (fi.getRequest() != null) {
                fi.getRequest().setAttribute(FILTER_APPLIED, Boolean.TRUE);
            }
            //执行父类beforeInvocation，类似于aop中的before
            InterceptorStatusToken token = super.beforeInvocation(fi);

            try {
                //filter传递
                fi.getChain().doFilter(fi.getRequest(), fi.getResponse());
            } finally {
                //执行父类的afterInvocation，类似于aop中的after
                super.afterInvocation(token, null);
            }
        }
    }

继续看父类的beforeInvocation方法，其中省略了一些不重要的代码片段

    protected InterceptorStatusToken beforeInvocation(Object object) {
        //根据SecurityMetadataSource获取配置的权限属性
        Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes = this.obtainSecurityMetadataSource().getAttributes(object);
        //省略……
         //判断是否需要对认证实体重新认证，默认为否
        Authentication authenticated = authenticateIfRequired();

        // Attempt authorization
        try {
            //决策管理器开始决定是否授权，如果授权失败，直接抛出AccessDeniedException
            this.accessDecisionManager.decide(authenticated, object, attributes);
        }
        catch (AccessDeniedException accessDeniedException) {
            publishEvent(new AuthorizationFailureEvent(object, attributes, authenticated,
                    accessDeniedException));

            throw accessDeniedException;
        }
    }

增加说明

Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes = this.obtainSecurityMetadataSource().getAttributes(object);

这里获取的是权限列表信息，比如说有这个配置
<security:intercept-url pattern="/index.jsp*" access="ROLE_USER,ROLE_ADMIN"/>
如果现在发起一个请求时index.jsp，那么根据这个请求返回的attributes集合就是分别包含ROLE_USER,ROLE_ADMIN属性的两个SecurityConfig对象

至于请求url如何匹配的，大家可以通过阅读DefaultFilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource类的源码，实际上，这里用到了spring的路径匹配工具类org.springframework.util.AntPathMatcher
AntPathMatcher匹配方式的通配符有三种：
?（匹配任何单字符），*（匹配0或者任意数量的字符），**（匹配0或者更多的目录）

由于之前在bean的定义过程已经知道决策管理器是AffirmativeBased，接着看AffirmativeBased的决策过程

    public void decide(Authentication authentication, Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> configAttributes)
            throws AccessDeniedException {
        int deny = 0;
        //循环voters，实际上是RoleVoter、AuthenticatedVoter
        for (AccessDecisionVoter voter : getDecisionVoters()) {
            //把具体的决策任务交给voter处理
              //voter只返回-1、0、1，只有为1才算授权成功
            int result = voter.vote(authentication, object, configAttributes);

            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Voter: " + voter + ", returned: " + result);
            }

            switch (result) {
            case AccessDecisionVoter.ACCESS_GRANTED:
                return;

            case AccessDecisionVoter.ACCESS_DENIED:
                deny++;

                break;

            default:
                break;
            }
        }
        //只要有一个voter拒绝了，则直接抛出访问拒绝异常
        if (deny > 0) {
            throw new AccessDeniedException(messages.getMessage("AbstractAccessDecisionManager.accessDenied",
                    "Access is denied"));
        }

        // To get this far, every AccessDecisionVoter abstained
        checkAllowIfAllAbstainDecisions();
    }

[color=red]实际上，有三种决策管理器，分别为AffirmativeBased、ConsensusBased、UnanimousBased，各自决策的区别是：
AffirmativeBased：只要有一个voter投同意票，就授权成功
ConsensusBased：只要投同意票的大于投反对票的，就授权成功
UnanimousBased：需要一致通过才授权成功[/color]具体决策规则很简单，只是根据voter返回的结果做处理
接下来，分别看RoleVoter、AuthenticatedVoter的源码
RoleVoter：

    public int vote(Authentication authentication, Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes) {
        int result = ACCESS_ABSTAIN;
        //从认证实体中获取所有的权限列表
        Collection<GrantedAuthority> authorities = extractAuthorities(authentication);
        //循环intercept-url配置的access权限列表
        for (ConfigAttribute attribute : attributes) {
            if (this.supports(attribute)) {
                result = ACCESS_DENIED;

                // Attempt to find a matching granted authority
                //循环认证实体所拥有的权限列表
                for (GrantedAuthority authority : authorities) {
                    if (attribute.getAttribute().equals(authority.getAuthority())) {
                        //只要有相同的权限，直接返回成功1
                        return ACCESS_GRANTED;
                    }
                }
            }
        }

        return result;
    }

AuthenticatedVoter：

    public int vote(Authentication authentication, Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes) {
        int result = ACCESS_ABSTAIN;

        for (ConfigAttribute attribute : attributes) {
            if (this.supports(attribute)) {
                result = ACCESS_DENIED;

                if (IS_AUTHENTICATED_FULLY.equals(attribute.getAttribute())) {
                    if (isFullyAuthenticated(authentication)) {
                        return ACCESS_GRANTED;
                    }
                }

                if (IS_AUTHENTICATED_REMEMBERED.equals(attribute.getAttribute())) {
                    if (authenticationTrustResolver.isRememberMe(authentication)
                        || isFullyAuthenticated(authentication)) {
                        return ACCESS_GRANTED;
                    }
                }

                if (IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY.equals(attribute.getAttribute())) {
                    if (authenticationTrustResolver.isAnonymous(authentication) || isFullyAuthenticated(authentication)
                        || authenticationTrustResolver.isRememberMe(authentication)) {
                        return ACCESS_GRANTED;
                    }
                }
            }
        }

        return result;
    }

[color=red]由于RoleVoter在list列表中的位置处于AuthenticatedVoter前面，只要RoleVoter通过，就不会再执行AuthenticatedVoter了。实际上AuthenticatedVoter只会对IS_AUTHENTICATED_FULLY、IS_AUTHENTICATED_REMEMBERED、IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY三种权限做vote处理。[/color]