Jmockit解决@Qualifier和@Resource出现 Missing @Injectable报错

Jmockit模拟@Qualifier和@Resource注入对象

开发的代码中有时会使用@Qualifier配合着@Autowired一起使用, 或者是使用@Resource来注入对象, 当Jmockit中使用@Injectable来修饰被测试代码依赖的类时, 会出现如下报错信息:

java.lang.IllegalStateException: Missing @Injectable for field "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxxx.service.OrderService orderService" in UserServiceImpl

业务代码:


/**
 * OrderService有两个实现类,分别为:OrderServiceImpl和NewOrderServiceImpl
 */
@Resource(name = "newOrderServiceImpl")
private OrderService orderService;

@Override
public void useOrderService() {
    String orderId = orderService.getOrderId();
    System.out.println(orderId);
}

OrderServiceImpl

@Service
public class OrderServiceImpl implements OrderService {
    @Override
    public String getOrderId() {
        return "orderServiceId";
    }
} 

NewOrderServiceImpl

@Service
public class NewOrderServiceImpl implements OrderService {
    @Override
    public String getOrderId() {
        return "newOrderId";
    }
}

解决上述报错的测试案例:

/**
 * OrderService变量名newOrderServiceImpl要跟@Resource(name = "newOrderServiceImpl")中保持一致
 */
@Injectable
private OrderService newOrderServiceImpl;
@Tested
private UserServiceImpl userServiceImpl;

@Test
public void testUserOrderService() {
    userServiceImpl.useOrderService();
}

业务代码2:

/**
 * 注入时使用了@Qualifier
 */
@Autowired
@Qualifier("newOrderServiceImpl")
private OrderService orderService;

@Override
public void useOrderService() {
    String orderId = orderService.getOrderId();
    System.out.println(orderId);
}

解决方案与上述测试案例相同, 保持测试案例中的变量名与@Qualifier(“newOrderServiceImpl”)中的值一致

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 1
    评论
JMockit is a Java library that provides support for mocking and testing. The @Qualifier annotation is used in JMockit to identify a specific instance of a bean to be used in a test. In Spring, the @Qualifier annotation is used in a similar way to identify a specific bean to be injected into a component. However, in JMockit, the @Qualifier annotation is used in conjunction with other annotations to specify which instance of a mock or spy object to use in a test. For example, consider a scenario where we have two implementations of a service interface and we want to mock one of them for testing. We can use the @Qualifier annotation to identify the bean to be mocked and the @Mocked annotation to create a mock object of that bean. ``` public interface MyService { String getName(); } @Service("fooService") public class FooService implements MyService { @Override public String getName() { return "Foo"; } } @Service("barService") public class BarService implements MyService { @Override public String getName() { return "Bar"; } } public class MyServiceTest { @Test public void testGetName(@Mocked @Qualifier("fooService") MyService fooService, @Mocked @Qualifier("barService") MyService barService) { new Expectations() {{ fooService.getName(); result = "Mocked Foo"; barService.getName(); result = "Mocked Bar"; }}; // Use the mocked instances of fooService and barService in the test // ... } } ``` In the above example, we have two implementations of the MyService interface, FooService and BarService, and we want to mock FooService for testing. We use the @Qualifier("fooService") annotation to identify the bean to be mocked and the @Mocked annotation to create a mock object of that bean. We also create a mock object of the BarService bean using the @Mocked and @Qualifier("barService") annotations. We can then use these mocked instances of the beans in our test.

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论 1
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值