微软(Microsoft)欲以62%的溢出价每股31美元、共计446亿美元收购雅虎(Yahoo),成为目前互联网的最大新闻。微软希望和雅虎联姻,以搜索市场的第2、3名的强强联合来对抗甚至打败搜索市场的老大谷歌(Google)。微软和雅虎联姻会实现微软的如意算盘吗?答案多半是否定的,为什么呢?有3点理由。 |
|
1. 微软和雅虎,在许多方面都是很相似的,包括搜索、即时通讯、地图、邮箱等,没有形成很强的互补关系,而是双方重叠的部分很多(见下面的列表),这样兼并后两个公司业务整合的工作量很大,需要很长的时间(一年到两年的时间),这期间业务自然受影响。其结果,反而会让竞争对手 Google 趁此机会有更快的发展,拉大他们之间的差距。(佐证: 微软投资者称收购雅虎无济于事 或削弱实力 , 分析:微软收购雅虎对双方都是灾难 )
2. 在互联网,人们的习惯势力是非常大的,不容易改变,大家对 Google 、 Apple 情有独钟,对微软的霸气存在一定的心里暗示或抵触情绪 (这里有一个例子: 美国网民恶搞微软收购雅虎(组图) ),这对微软是不利的。 IT 时代特征“ 30 年河东、 30 年河西”比较明显,在某个旧领域称雄的公司,很难在新的领域称雄。例如,微软在数据库上一直想打翻身仗,但始终很难超过 Oracle.
3. 微软的收购历史说明了这一点,大部分的微软兼并案例都没有获得成功,常常将收购来的公司置于孤独的境界,实例不少。微软和雅虎的文化差异也比较大,对于公司规模相差不大的情况下,两者的冲突会更大些。(佐证: 微软并购雅虎面临三道槛:两公司文化能否.. )
附表:Yahoo, Microsoft和Google的网络业务对比
业务项目 | Yahoo | Microsoft | |
Search 搜索 | |||
搜索广告业务 | |||
桌面 | Yahoo tool bar | OS, Office | |
内容服务 |
| ||
行业服务(汽车、财经等) | |||
账户管理 | Yahoo ID | Passport, Live ID |
|
个性化主页 | |||
电子商务(购物) | |||
游戏 |
| ||
地图 | |||
即时通讯 | |||
邮件 | |||
社区帮助服务 | |||
照片共享 | |||
博客 | |||
Widgets |
| ||
Video |
| ||
Mobile | |||
Web Development | |||
Web Mashup Tools | |||
Website Services | |||
| |||
Social Events | |||
Social Bookmarking | |||
Music Service |
| ||
Music Software |
|
相关链接
- 鲍尔默笑称唯一不能收购雅虎的是谷歌
- 分析:微软拟收购雅虎表明无力单独对抗谷歌
- 微软向全球推出Dynamics CRM 4.0
- 微软洽购推动雅虎股价盘前大涨60%
- 微软洽购雅虎金额创科技业收购规模之最
- 高盛称微软收购雅虎对百度不利
- 洪波:微软为什么错过了互联网
- 国际先驱论坛报:微软并购案对硅谷小企业..
- 中国政法教授:中国雅虎闪电裁员有违法之嫌
- 传Google CEO致电杨致远愿助雅虎对抗微软
- Google怒斥微软欲垄断互联网 微软回应
-
---------------------- 微软CEO 鲍尔默 给Yahoo董事会的正式兼并书函 -------------------------------
Dear Members of the Board:
I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of Microsoft to make a proposal for a business combination of Microsoft and Yahoo!. Under our proposal, Microsoft would acquire all of the outstanding shares of Yahoo! common stock for per share consideration of $31 based on Microsoft’s closing share price on January 31, 2008, payable in the form of $31 in cash or 0.9509 of a share of Microsoft common stock. Microsoft would provide each Yahoo! shareholder with the ability to choose whether to receive the consideration in cash or Microsoft common stock, subject to pro-ration so that in the aggregate one-half of the Yahoo! common shares will be exchanged for shares of Microsoft common stock and one-half of the Yahoo! common shares will be converted into the right to receive cash. Our proposal is not subject to any financing condition.
Our proposal represents a 62% premium above the closing price of Yahoo! common stock of $19.18 on January 31, 2008. The implied premium for the operating assets of the company clearly is considerably greater when adjusted for the minority, non-controlled assets and cash. By whatever financial measure you use - EBITDA, free cash flow, operating cash flow, net income, or analyst target prices - this proposal represents a compelling value realization event for your shareholders.
We believe that Microsoft common stock represents a very attractive investment opportunity for Yahoo!’s shareholders. Microsoft has generated revenue growth of 15%, earnings growth of 26%, and a return on equity of 35% on average for the last three years. Microsoft’s share price has generated shareholder returns of 8% during the last one year period and 28% during the last three year period, significantly outperforming the S&P 500. It is our view that Microsoft has significant potential upside given the continued solid growth in our core businesses, the recent launch of Windows Vista, and other strategic initiatives.
Microsoft’s consistent belief has been that the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! clearly represents the best way to deliver maximum value to our respective shareholders, as well as create a more efficient and competitive company that would provide greater value and service to our customers. In late 2006 and early 2007, we jointly explored a broad range of ways in which our two companies might work together. These discussions were based on a vision that the online businesses of Microsoft and Yahoo! should be aligned in some way to create a more effective competitor in the online marketplace. We discussed a number of alternatives ranging from commercial partnerships to a merger proposal, which you rejected. While a commercial partnership may have made sense at one time, Microsoft believes that the only alternative now is the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! that we are proposing.
In February 2007, I received a letter from your Chairman indicating the view of the Yahoo! Board that “now is not the right time from the perspective of our shareholders to enter into discussions regarding an acquisition transaction.” According to that letter, the principal reason for this view was the Yahoo! Board’s confidence in the “potential upside” if management successfully executed on a reformulated strategy based on certain operational initiatives, such as Project Panama , and a significant organizational realignment. A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved.
While online advertising growth continues, there are significant benefits of scale in advertising platform economics, in capital costs for search index build-out, and in research and development, making this a time of industry consolidation and convergence. Today, the market is increasingly dominated by one player who is consolidating its dominance through acquisition. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! can offer a credible alternative for consumers, advertisers, and publishers. Synergies of this combination fall into four areas:
Scale economics: This combination enables synergies related to scale economics of the advertising platform where today there is only one competitor at scale. This includes synergies across both search and non-search related advertising that will strengthen the value proposition to both advertisers and publishers. Additionally, the combination allows us to consolidate capital spending.
Expanded R&D capacity: The combined talent of our engineering resources can be focused on R&D priorities such as a single search index and single advertising platform. Together we can unleash new levels of innovation, delivering enhanced user experiences, breakthroughs in search, and new advertising platform capabilities. Many of these breakthroughs are a function of an engineering scale that today neither of our companies has on its own.
Operational efficiencies: Eliminating redundant infrastructure and duplicative operating costs will improve the financial performance of the combined entity.
Emerging user experiences: Our combined ability to focus engineering resources that drive innovation in emerging scenarios such as video, mobile services, online commerce, social media, and social platforms is greatly enhanced.
We would value the opportunity to further discuss with you how to optimize the integration of our respective businesses to create a leading global technology company with exceptional display and search advertising capabilities. You should also be aware that we intend to offer significant retention packages to your engineers, key leaders and employees across all disciplines.
We have dedicated considerable time and resources to an analysis of a potential transaction and are confident that the combination will receive all necessary regulatory approvals. We look forward to discussing this with you, and both our internal legal team and outside counsel are available to meet with your counsel at their earliest convenience.
Our proposal is subject to the negotiation of a definitive merger agreement and our having the opportunity to conduct certain limited and confirmatory due diligence. In addition, because a portion of the aggregate merger consideration would consist of Microsoft common stock, we would provide Yahoo! the opportunity to conduct appropriate limited due diligence with respect to Microsoft. We are prepared to deliver a draft merger agreement to you and begin discussions immediately.
In light of the significance of this proposal to your shareholders and ours, as well as the potential for selective disclosures, our intention is to publicly release the text of this letter tomorrow morning.
Due to the importance of these discussions and the value represented by our proposal, we expect the Yahoo! Board to engage in a full review of our proposal. My leadership team and I would be happy to make ourselves available to meet with you and your Board at your earliest convenience. Depending on the nature of your response, Microsoft reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!’s shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal.
We believe this proposal represents a unique opportunity to create significant value for Yahoo!’s shareholders and employees, and the combined company will be better positioned to provide an enhanced value proposition to users and advertisers. We hope that you and your Board share our enthusiasm, and we look forward to a prompt and favorable reply.