关于编译器是否合成默认构造函数

1.我的疑惑

语言标准，和编译器实现是不同的。语言标准感觉就像需求吧，编译器实现则是具体的实现。语言标准中甚至有很多未定义的地方，比如【未指定的值】到底是多少，到底用【未指定的值】还是【陷阱标识】作为默认初始化基本数据类型的初值。再比如ungetc函数，这个更乱。
对于编译器合成默认构造函数问题，我一直有疑惑，c++ primer上说：

如果我们的类没有显式地定义构造函数，
那么编译器就会为我们隐式地定义一个默认构造函数。

但是反汇编就很容易看出，类似下面这个聚合类，gcc并没有合成默认构造函数。

struct
{
	int a;
	int b;
}

现在终于破案了，合成默认构造函数是需求，不合成则是gcc的一种实现。因为就算去实现，也是一个空函数，就和那些永远走不到的无意义if分支一样。

2.标准和实现

c++标准

编译器是否会为下列程序合成默认构造函数？ - 张景旺的回答 - 知乎
https://www.zhihu.com/question/30804314/answer/49528236

class Member {
public:
Member(int a) {};
};

class NoDefaultConstructor {
Member m;
// NoDefaultConstructor() : m(1234) {}; //这样才行……
};

NoDefaultConstructor oops; // Error..

完整的情况如下：
The implicitly-declared or defaulted default constructor for class T is undefined (until C++11)defined as deleted (since C++11) if any of the following is true:

• T has a member of reference type without a brace-or-equal initializer. (since C++11)

• T has a const member without user-defined default constructor or a brace-or-equal initializer (since C++11).

• T has a member (without a brace-or-equal initializer) (since C++11), which has a deleted default constructor, or its default constructor is ambiguous or inaccessible from this constructor.

• T has a direct or virtual base which has a deleted default constructor, or it is ambiguous or inaccessible from this constructor.

• T has a direct or virtual base which has a deleted destructor, or a destructor that is inaccessible from this constructor.

• T is a union with at least one variant member with non-trivial default constructor.
  (since C++11)

• T is a union and all of its variant members are const.

探索C++对象模型上(编译器实现探究)C++95

编译器是否会为下列程序合成默认构造函数？ - altair8800的回答 - 知乎
https://www.zhihu.com/question/30804314/answer/49618441

按照深入探索C++对象模型上的说法，四种情况下会有合成默认构造函数：数据成员或基类有、虚拟函数、虚拟继承。所以应该是没有的。

3.很久之前看到的某个相关问题

不存在默认构造函数