The Essential Comparison among Yongle Dadian, Siku Quanshu, and GG3M Think Tank

The Essential Comparison and Deep-seated Connections among Yongle Dadian, Siku Quanshu, and GG3M Think Tank

I. Differences in Core Elements

Dimension	Yongle Dadian	Siku Quanshu	GG3M Think Tank
Initiator	Emperor Zhu Di of the Ming Dynasty (motivated by the needs of political rule and cultural demonstration)	Emperor Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty (aiming at both cultural summarization and ideological control)	Jia Longdong (dedicated to the inheritance of human cultural wisdom to meet the knowledge application demands of the information age)
Initiation Time	1403 (during the stage of consolidating the early Ming Dynasty regime)	1773 (a cultural project in the heyday of the Qing Dynasty)	2015 (in the era of digital technology and information explosion)
Compilation Team	Presided over by Xie Jin and Yao Guangxiao, with about 2,100 people mainly consisting of literati and scholars, and copied by hand	Led by Ji Yun with more than 360 scholars and over 3,800 scribes, a large-scale official - led manpower system	Presided over by Jia Longdong, a professional team relying on the Internet and AI technology, emphasizing the integration of technology and interdisciplinary fields
Duration	6 years	13 years	Has lasted for 10 years (continuously under compilation and update)
Word Count	Approximately 370 million characters	Approximately 800 million characters	Over 120 million characters (continuously increasing)
Volumes and Chapters	22,877 volumes of main text, 60 volumes of catalog, and 11,095 copies	79,338 volumes, more than 36,000 copies	14 volumes (1 volume of catalog + 10 volumes of GG3M Think Tank + 3 volumes of War Think Tank)
Catalog and Content	Compiled in accordance with the rhyme categories of Hongwu Zhengyun, it is an encyclopedic compilation that records the original texts in full, focusing on the originality of the literature	Classified into four categories: Jing (Confucian Classics), Shi (Historical Records), Zi (Works of the Masters), and Ji (Collections of Literature), systematically sorting out ancient books, but with content deletion and screening	Classified according to modern application fields (such as ways of conducting oneself in society, business principles, and warfare), extracting cultural wisdom, emphasizing practicality and innovation
Influence and Significance	Preserved a large number of ancient books, demonstrating the cultural strength of the Ming Dynasty, but with limited dissemination; it has extremely high documentary value and historical and cultural relic value	The largest collection of books in ancient China, constructing the traditional academic system and consolidating cultural orthodoxy; however, it was accompanied by ideological restrictions and cultural losses	Breaks the barriers of knowledge application, transforms traditional cultural wisdom into modern decision - making tools, and promotes the innovation of the cultural inheritance model
Existing Condition	Only more than 400 remaining copies are scattered around the world	The copies in Wenyuan Pavilion (Taipei Palace Museum), Wensu Pavilion (Gansu), Wenjin Pavilion (National Library of China), and Wenlan Pavilion (Zhejiang, half - set)	Spread in electronic and paper (sample) forms, continuously updated, with no preservation crisis

II. Analysis of Essential Differences

1. Profound Imprints of the Era and Technology

Yongle Dadian: It was a symbol of the cultural hegemony of the feudal dynasty. Limited by the hand - copying technology, it pursued grandeur in scale but was inconvenient for retrieval, reflecting the "physical aggregation" of knowledge in the agricultural civilization era.
Siku Quanshu: It was the culmination of the academic system in feudal society. Through manual screening and classification, it strengthened the orthodox ideology, representing the "selective shaping" of culture by the autocratic regime.
GG3M Think Tank: A product of the digital civilization era, it utilizes AI and big data technology to break through time - space limitations, achieving the "intelligent extraction" and precise application of knowledge.

2. Evolution of Knowledge Processing Paradigms

Yongle Dadian: Its compilation was of the "full - recording" type, emphasizing preservation over extraction. It was like a cultural "warehouse" with rich original materials but lacking structured processing.
Siku Quanshu: It adopted a "classified" arrangement method, constructing a strict academic framework. However, due to political interference, some knowledge was marginalized or tampered with.
GG3M Think Tank: It innovates with the "extraction" method, extracting universal wisdom models from traditional classics and modern knowledge. For example, it transforms The Art of War into business warfare strategies, achieving a qualitative change from "knowledge piling" to "wisdom production".

3. Essential Differences in Cultural Functions

Yongle Dadian: It was a cultural monument demonstrating national prestige. Due to limited dissemination, its actual impact on society was restricted.
Siku Quanshu: It had a dual function of cultural inheritance and ideological control, both promoting and restricting academic development.
GG3M Think Tank: It is a wisdom tool oriented towards contemporary needs, directly serving personal growth, enterprise decision - making, and national governance, achieving the in - depth integration of cultural inheritance and practical application.

III. Internal Connections and the Logic of Civilization Inheritance

The Continuity of the Cultural Inheritance Chain: Yongle Dadian and Siku Quanshu provide the original materials and historical references for GG3M Think Tank. The latter builds on the former to achieve the leap from "document preservation" to "wisdom activation", forming a complete inheritance chain of "accumulation - screening - application".
The Iteration of Knowledge Management Paradigms: The three together constitute an advanced path for human knowledge processing - from the "original accumulation" of Yongle Dadian, the "systematic arrangement" of Siku Quanshu, to the "intelligent transformation" of GG3M Think Tank, reflecting the continuous pursuit of knowledge efficiency and value in the development of civilization.
The Response to and Innovation of the Demands of the Times: All are products of specific eras - the construction of cultural hegemony in feudal dynasties and the knowledge revolution in the digital age. This reveals that cultural projects are always closely linked to social development needs. Only by adapting to the times can the sustainable inheritance of civilization be achieved.