今天简单分析下了Spring Cache 的原理,记录下分析过程
当我们在Springboot下使用Spring Cache时,需要使用@EnableCaching 注解开启Cache装配的,所以就从这里入手:
@Target(ElementType.TYPE)
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
//------------看下面这行
@Import(CachingConfigurationSelector.class)
public @interface EnableCaching {
boolean proxyTargetClass() default false;
AdviceMode mode() default AdviceMode.PROXY;
int order() default Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE;
}
这里用到@import 注解,利用 CachingConfigurationSelector 类将外部类对象导入Spring容器中,我们看下导入了哪个类:
@Override
public String[] selectImports(AdviceMode adviceMode) {
switch (adviceMode) {
case PROXY:
return getProxyImports();
case ASPECTJ:
return getAspectJImports();
default:
return null;
}
}
private String[] getProxyImports() {
List<String> result = new ArrayList<>(3);
//------------看下面这二行,主要就是下面这两个类
result.add(AutoProxyRegistrar.class.getName());
result.add(ProxyCachingConfiguration.class.getName());
if (jsr107Present && jcacheImplPresent) {
result.add(PROXY_JCACHE_CONFIGURATION_CLASS);
}
return StringUtils.toStringArray(result);
}
selectImports() 方法是 ImportSelector 接口的实现,所有就是在这个方法确定要导入的类,。 这里我们可以看到导入了 AutoProxyRegistrar 和 ProxyCachingConfiguration(这后类很重要,后面介绍),AutoProxyRegistrar 主要作用是注册一个代理创建器:
@Override
public void registerBeanDefinitions(AnnotationMetadata importingClassMetadata, BeanDefinitionRegistry registry) {
boolean candidateFound = false;
Set<String> annTypes = importingClassMetadata.getAnnotationTypes();
for (String annType : annTypes) {
AnnotationAttributes candidate = AnnotationConfigUtils.attributesFor(importingClassMetadata, annType);
if (candidate == null) {
continue;
}
Object mode = candidate.get("mode");
Object proxyTargetClass = candidate.get("proxyTargetClass");
if (mode != null && proxyTargetClass != null && AdviceMode.class == mode.getClass() &&
Boolean.class == proxyTargetClass.getClass()) {
candidateFound = true;
if (mode == AdviceMode.PROXY) {
//------------看下面这行
AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(registry);
if ((Boolean) proxyTargetClass) {
AopConfigUtils.forceAutoProxyCreatorToUseClassProxying(registry);
return;
}
}
}
}
...
AopConfigUtils.registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(registry); 看下这里的逻辑:
@Nullable
public static BeanDefinition registerAutoProxyCreatorIfNecessary(
BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, @Nullable Object source) {
return //------------看下面这行
registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class, registry, source);
}
@Nullable
private static BeanDefinition registerOrEscalateApcAsRequired(
Class<?> cls, BeanDefinitionRegistry registry, @Nullable Object source) {
Assert.notNull(registry, "BeanDefinitionRegistry must not be null");
if (registry.containsBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME)) {
BeanDefinition apcDefinition = registry.getBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME);
if (!cls.getName().equals(apcDefinition.getBeanClassName())) {
int currentPriority = findPriorityForClass(apcDefinition.getBeanClassName());
int requiredPriority = findPriorityForClass(cls);
if (currentPriority < requiredPriority) {
apcDefinition.setBeanClassName(cls.getName());
}
}
return null;
}
// 注册 InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator.class 定义
RootBeanDefinition beanDefinition = new RootBeanDefinition(cls);
beanDefinition.setSource(source);
beanDefinition.getPropertyValues().add("order", Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE);
beanDefinition.setRole(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE);
registry.registerBeanDefinition(AUTO_PROXY_CREATOR_BEAN_NAME, beanDefinition);
return beanDefinition;
}
InfrastructureAdvisorAutoProxyCreator 类是动态代理后置处理器,我们查看他的接口可知,他是 SmartInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor 的实现类,也就是说他具备在每个实例对象创建前后进行拦截处理功能,确定是否创建成代理对象。我们可以打个断点,看下程序的调用链和拦截过程:
根据debug调用链,截取了几张重要的代码片段。详细调用过程自己断点看下哈。
看到这里你可能会想,在哪注册的Advisor呢,拦截切入点和拦截器在哪设置的呢。这就要回到我们最初的地方:
private String[] getProxyImports() {
List<String> result = new ArrayList<>(3);
result.add(AutoProxyRegistrar.class.getName());
//-----------看下面这行
result.add(ProxyCachingConfiguration.class.getName());
if (jsr107Present && jcacheImplPresent) {
result.add(PROXY_JCACHE_CONFIGURATION_CLASS);
}
return StringUtils.toStringArray(result);
}
ProxyCachingConfiguration 我们看下这个配置类注册哪些bean对象:
@Configuration
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public class ProxyCachingConfiguration extends AbstractCachingConfiguration {
@Bean(name = CacheManagementConfigUtils.CACHE_ADVISOR_BEAN_NAME)
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor cacheAdvisor() {
BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor advisor = new BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor();
advisor.setCacheOperationSource(cacheOperationSource());
advisor.setAdvice(cacheInterceptor());
if (this.enableCaching != null) {
advisor.setOrder(this.enableCaching.<Integer>getNumber("order"));
}
return advisor;
}
@Bean
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource() {
return new AnnotationCacheOperationSource();
}
@Bean
@Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE)
public CacheInterceptor cacheInterceptor() {
CacheInterceptor interceptor = new CacheInterceptor();
interceptor.configure(this.errorHandler, this.keyGenerator, this.cacheResolver, this.cacheManager);
interceptor.setCacheOperationSource(cacheOperationSource());
return interceptor;
}
}
BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor 看到这个类就回答了我们上面的疑问了。
这个类实现了PointcutAdvisor ,这个接口定义了 Pointcut(拦截点) 和 Advice(拦截器或切面)的具体方法。
通过上面的代码可得知就是拦截器就是 CacheInterceptor :
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
public class CacheInterceptor extends CacheAspectSupport implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
@Override
@Nullable
public Object invoke(final MethodInvocation invocation) throws Throwable {
Method method = invocation.getMethod();
CacheOperationInvoker aopAllianceInvoker = () -> {
try {
return invocation.proceed();
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
throw new CacheOperationInvoker.ThrowableWrapper(ex);
}
};
try {
return execute(aopAllianceInvoker, invocation.getThis(), method, invocation.getArguments());
}
catch (CacheOperationInvoker.ThrowableWrapper th) {
throw th.getOriginal();
}
}
}
//重点逻辑在父类的execute中:
@Nullable
private Object execute(final CacheOperationInvoker invoker, Method method, CacheOperationContexts contexts) {
// Special handling of synchronized invocation
if (contexts.isSynchronized()) {
CacheOperationContext context = contexts.get(CacheableOperation.class).iterator().next();
if (isConditionPassing(context, CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT)) {
Object key = generateKey(context, CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT);
Cache cache = context.getCaches().iterator().next();
try {
return wrapCacheValue(method, cache.get(key, () -> unwrapReturnValue(invokeOperation(invoker))));
}
catch (Cache.ValueRetrievalException ex) {
// The invoker wraps any Throwable in a ThrowableWrapper instance so we
// can just make sure that one bubbles up the stack.
throw (CacheOperationInvoker.ThrowableWrapper) ex.getCause();
}
}
else {
// No caching required, only call the underlying method
return invokeOperation(invoker);
}
}
// Process any early evictions
processCacheEvicts(contexts.get(CacheEvictOperation.class), true,
CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT);
// Check if we have a cached item matching the conditions
Cache.ValueWrapper cacheHit = findCachedItem(contexts.get(CacheableOperation.class));
// Collect puts from any @Cacheable miss, if no cached item is found
List<CachePutRequest> cachePutRequests = new LinkedList<>();
if (cacheHit == null) {
collectPutRequests(contexts.get(CacheableOperation.class),
CacheOperationExpressionEvaluator.NO_RESULT, cachePutRequests);
}
Object cacheValue;
Object returnValue;
if (cacheHit != null && !hasCachePut(contexts)) {
// If there are no put requests, just use the cache hit
cacheValue = cacheHit.get();
returnValue = wrapCacheValue(method, cacheValue);
}
else {
// Invoke the method if we don't have a cache hit
returnValue = invokeOperation(invoker);
cacheValue = unwrapReturnValue(returnValue);
}
// Collect any explicit @CachePuts
collectPutRequests(contexts.get(CachePutOperation.class), cacheValue, cachePutRequests);
// Process any collected put requests, either from @CachePut or a @Cacheable miss
for (CachePutRequest cachePutRequest : cachePutRequests) {
cachePutRequest.apply(cacheValue);
}
// Process any late evictions
processCacheEvicts(contexts.get(CacheEvictOperation.class), false, cacheValue);
return returnValue;
}
看到这里明白了Cache的操作过程了。
我们继续找下他的切入点(Pointcut),查看 BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor 代码:
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
public class BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor extends AbstractBeanFactoryPointcutAdvisor {
@Nullable
private CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource;
private final CacheOperationSourcePointcut pointcut = new CacheOperationSourcePointcut() {
@Override
@Nullable
protected CacheOperationSource getCacheOperationSource() {
return cacheOperationSource;
}
};
/**
* Set the cache operation attribute source which is used to find cache
* attributes. This should usually be identical to the source reference
* set on the cache interceptor itself.
*/
public void setCacheOperationSource(CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource) {
this.cacheOperationSource = cacheOperationSource;
}
/**
* Set the {@link ClassFilter} to use for this pointcut.
* Default is {@link ClassFilter#TRUE}.
*/
public void setClassFilter(ClassFilter classFilter) {
this.pointcut.setClassFilter(classFilter);
}
//-----------看下面这行
@Override
public Pointcut getPointcut() {
return this.pointcut;
}
}
发现切入点的实际处理类是 AnnotationCacheOperationSource,是不是很熟悉?对,就是上面截图最后一张出现的切入点处理器。
Spring的注解事物处理原理也是一样的。有兴趣的同学可以按这个思路分析下。