OWASP: How to use flawfinder output to improve your source code

Flawfinder is a commonly used static source code analysis tool that can check code according to CWE guidelines and provide modification suggestions.

OWASP Top 10 and CWE have a one-to-many correspondence relationship

Recap:
How to Install Python 3 and Flawfinder for Static Analysis in a Windows Environment

Relationship between OWASP and flawfinder

subject	content
CWE Mapping	Flawfinder uses CWE identifiers to classify the vulnerabilities it detects in source code. These CWE identifiers are also referenced by OWASP in its Top Ten list to describe the nature of various web application security risks. This common use of CWE creates a connection between the vulnerabilities that Flawfinder detects and the broader security risks that OWASP addresses.
Complementary Roles	Flawfinder can be seen as a tool that helps developers address some of the specific coding issues that could lead to vulnerabilities covered by OWASP guidelines. While OWASP provides the high-level guidance on what types of vulnerabilities to be aware of, Flawfinder helps developers find and fix those issues in their code.
Common Goals	Both OWASP and Flawfinder aim to improve software security by identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, though they do so in different ways and contexts. OWASP provides a high-level framework and guidelines for securing web applications, while Flawfinder is a tool that focuses on finding specific coding vulnerabilities.

2021 list-of-mapped-cwes

output csv audio for example

name	description
File Line Column	where the code is
Level	risk level
Suggestion HelpUri	revise suggestion from CWE official
CWEs	Which CWE rule is violated?

What is flawfinder level

In the Flawfinder report, the level field represents the severity level of potential security vulnerabilities. These levels range from 1 to 5, with higher numbers indicating greater potential risk. Flawfinder uses these levels to help developers prioritize the security issues that need attention.

Explanation of the Level Ratings:

Level 1 (Lowest Risk):

This level indicates that the potential issue poses a low risk. It typically involves coding patterns or functions that could potentially cause security issues but may not necessarily lead to vulnerabilities in certain situations. Developers can review these issues, but they are usually not the primary focus.

Level 2:

This level represents a slightly higher potential risk than Level 1 but still falls within the low-risk category. These issues may need attention but generally do not lead to serious security problems in the short term.

Level 3 (Moderate Risk):

This level indicates a moderate risk, and developers are usually advised to pay close attention to these issues. Vulnerabilities at this level could cause security problems under certain conditions and should be fixed or mitigated.

Level 4:

This level represents a relatively high risk, with a greater likelihood of causing security vulnerabilities. Developers should prioritize addressing these issues to reduce potential security risks.

Level 5 (Highest Risk):

This level indicates a serious security risk, typically involving clear and easily exploitable vulnerabilities. These issues require immediate attention, as they could directly compromise the system’s security.

Reference

https://owasp.org/Top10/A02_2021-Cryptographic_Failures/#list-of-mapped-cwes