Slow performance fix oracle alert log v$diag_alert_ext x$diag_alert_ext

Slow performance fix oracle alert log v$diag_alert_ext x$diag_alert_ext

v$diag_alert_ext aka x$diag_alert_ext should be useful for querying the oracle alert log. Unfortunately with comon conditions in the where clause, queries against it run unusably slow.

This is covered in Mos doc 1684140.1 “Selects from v$diag_alert_ext run slowly with large alert logs“, but that ends with the unhelpful “Solution: There is no solution.“. Bug 18643828 is an (unactioned) enhancement request from 2014 to add indexes to x$diag_alert_ext.

But actually there is a solution already – the below script runs fast on all databases I’ve tested it on so far

-- 1) Initial setup, one-off.
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE gtt_diag_alert_ext (
     host_id VARCHAR2(67)
   , originating_timestamp TIMESTAMP(9) WITH TIME ZONE
   , message_type VARCHAR2(14)
   , message_level VARCHAR2(9)
   , message_text VARCHAR2(2051)
) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS
;
-- 2) Query script
TRUNCATE TABLE gtt_diag_alert_ext t ;  -- only needed if not connecting as a new session.
INSERT INTO gtt_diag_alert_ext t ( t.host_id , t.originating_timestamp , t.message_type , t.message_level , t.message_text )
SELECT d.host_id
     , d.originating_timestamp
     , CASE d.message_type
          WHEN 1 THEN 'Unknown'
          WHEN 2 THEN 'Incident Error'
          WHEN 3 THEN 'Error'
          WHEN 4 THEN 'Warning'
          WHEN 5 THEN 'Notification'
          WHEN 6 THEN 'Trace'
          END AS message_type
     , CASE d.message_level
         WHEN 1 THEN 'Critical'
         WHEN 2 THEN 'Severe'
         WHEN 8 THEN 'Important'
         WHEN 16 THEN 'Normal'
         END AS message_level
     , d.message_text
  FROM v$diag_alert_ext d
 WHERE d.originating_timestamp > SYSTIMESTAMP - 1
;
SELECT t.originating_timestamp
     , t.host_id
     , t.message_type
     , t.message_level
     , t.message_text
  FROM gtt_diag_alert_ext t
 WHERE t.message_text LIKE '%ORA-%'
 ORDER BY t.originating_timestamp DESC
;

A real table could be used instead of a global temporary table, especially if you wanted to persist the results or centralise them into a single remote database. From v18.1, a private temporary table could be used instead. A pl/sql array or even simple pl/sql loop would also work. I found that ordered_predicates and with clause materialize hints did not fix performance in my testing.

Other columns in v$diag_alert_ext might be useful to output also, such as component_id and module_id.

Be aware v$diag_alert_ext is undocumented and hence unsupported, it relies on automatic diagnostic repository (ADR) working correctly, which might not always be the case especially in upgraded databases with non-standard directory locations or symbolic links – so worth checking there is data in v$diag_alert_ext before relying on this. Parsing alert log file on OS is likely a safer option, using old style cron scripts or newer filebeat/logstash for visualisations. Obtaining the data from the central OEM repository tables is another alternative.

 August 23, 2018 
 Posted in Scripts

  • RobKsays:

    27 August 2018 at 15:09

    Hello!

    A had similar problem with our monitoring using v$diag_alert_ext.
    Reading your article and testing your advice I realised that select on v$diag_alert_ext is fast when you have a simple filter like originating_timestamp > SYSTIMESTAMP – 1

    It becomes slow when adding more complex criteria such as: originating_timestamp > systimestamp-301/(24*60*60)
    or and message_text not like ‘%(ORA-3136)%’.

    So the easiest solution is to use an inline view and making sure no merging or predicate pushing is taking place.

    With the with clause and a hint a real-life monitoring query looks like this:

    with oneday as (select /*+ materialize */ * from v$diag_alert_ext where ORIGINATING_TIMESTAMP>systimestamp-1)
    select to_char(ORIGINATING_TIMESTAMP,’YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS’) || ‘ ‘ || message_text from oneday
    where ORIGINATING_TIMESTAMP>systimestamp-301/(24*60*60) and message_text like ‘%ORA-%’ and message_text not like ‘%result of ORA-609%’ and message_text not like ‘%result of ORA-28%’ and message_text not like ‘%(ORA-3136)%’ and message_text not like ‘%ORA-01013:%’;

    This is fast and quick, no object needs to be created.
    I think it is an improved version of your original idea.

    Thanks for the hint. I’ve been struggling with this for quite some time.
    Cheers,
    Robert

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
Go语言(也称为Golang)是由Google开发的一种静态强类型、编译型的编程语言。它旨在成为一门简单、高效、安全和并发的编程语言,特别适用于构建高性能的服务器和分布式系统。以下是Go语言的一些主要特点和优势: 简洁性:Go语言的语法简单直观,易于学习和使用。它避免了复杂的语法特性,如继承、重载等,转而采用组合和接口来实现代码的复用和扩展。 高性能:Go语言具有出色的性能,可以媲美C和C++。它使用静态类型系统和编译型语言的优势,能够生成高效的机器码。 并发性:Go语言内置了对并发的支持,通过轻量级的goroutine和channel机制,可以轻松实现并发编程。这使得Go语言在构建高性能的服务器和分布式系统时具有天然的优势。 安全性:Go语言具有强大的类型系统和内存管理机制,能够减少运行时错误和内存泄漏等问题。它还支持编译时检查,可以在编译阶段就发现潜在的问题。 标准库:Go语言的标准库非常丰富,包含了大量的实用功能和工具,如网络编程、文件操作、加密解密等。这使得开发者可以更加专注于业务逻辑的实现,而无需花费太多时间在底层功能的实现上。 跨平台:Go语言支持多种操作系统和平台,包括Windows、Linux、macOS等。它使用统一的构建系统(如Go Modules),可以轻松地跨平台编译和运行代码。 开源和社区支持:Go语言是开源的,具有庞大的社区支持和丰富的资源。开发者可以通过社区获取帮助、分享经验和学习资料。 总之,Go语言是一种简单、高效、安全、并发的编程语言,特别适用于构建高性能的服务器和分布式系统。如果你正在寻找一种易于学习和使用的编程语言,并且需要处理大量的并发请求和数据,那么Go语言可能是一个不错的选择。

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值