mysql-count优化

count是统计数据的行数的,一般分页都会用到,常见的有count(1),count(*)写法,很多人会认为count(*)比count(1)的效率会高,用数据说话

count(*):

mysql> SELECT count(*) FROM `job_instance`;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
|  2345399 |
+----------+
1 row in set (35.19 sec)

mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM `job_instance`;
+----+-------------+--------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table        | partitions | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref  | rows    | filtered | Extra       |
+----+-------------+--------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | job_instance | NULL       | index | NULL          | PRIMARY | 8       | NULL | 2497645 |   100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+--------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.04 sec)

mysql> show WARNINGS;
+-------+------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Level | Code | Message                                                                    |
+-------+------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Note  | 1003 | /* select#1 */ select count(0) AS `count(*)` from `my_test`.`job_instance` |
+-------+------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.04 sec)

 count(1):

mysql> SELECT count(1) FROM `job_instance`;
+----------+
| count(1) |
+----------+
|  2345399 |
+----------+
1 row in set (35.18 sec)

mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT count(1) FROM `job_instance`;
+----+-------------+--------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table        | partitions | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref  | rows    | filtered | Extra       |
+----+-------------+--------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | job_instance | NULL       | index | NULL          | PRIMARY | 8       | NULL | 2497645 |   100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+--------------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+---------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set (0.06 sec)

mysql> show WARNINGS;
+-------+------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Level | Code | Message                                                                    |
+-------+------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Note  | 1003 | /* select#1 */ select count(1) AS `count(1)` from `my_test`.`job_instance` |
+-------+------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.07 sec)

执行计划几乎一样,执行耗时也差不多,所以性能是相等的,那怎样对它进行优化,减少查询时间呢?加二级索引

表结构如图所示:

现在对flow_id加一个二级索引 

mysql>  SELECT count(*) FROM `job_instance`;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
|  2345399 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.11 sec)

 添加一个二级索引,性能提高了好几百倍,这到底是为什么呢?

如果一张表中只有一个主键,没有其他索引的话,走的是id索引,而id是主键,主键索引树的一个聚簇索引,id跟数据绑在一起,如果要统计id,必须要读数据,则效率就很慢

如果一张表中有一个二级索引,非主键索引树是非聚簇索引,则统计二级索引叶子节点的个数,叶子节点就是存着id,不需要回表查找,也就不需要读取数据,所以效率大大提高了

还有一各问题,如果一张表,多个二级索引,是走索引key_len最短的那一个,如果where条件中有了非索引属性条件,则不走索引

  • 1
    点赞
  • 2
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值