数组排序开销为何比List要小?

A final approach to achieving failure atomicity is to perform the operation on
a temporary copy of the object and to replace the contents of the object with the
temporary copy once the operation is complete. This approach occurs naturally
when the computation can be performed more quickly once the data has been
stored in a temporary data structure. For example, Collections.sort dumps its
input list into an array prior to sorting to reduce the cost of accessing elements in
the inner loop of the sort. This is done for performance, but as an added benefit, it
ensures that the input list will be untouched if the sort fails.

 

其中说到Collections.sort方法是在排序前将其input list复制至array中,以减少排序的内层循环访问元素的开销,这里List为什么会开销更大呢?List的哪些具体结构特性决定了这个?

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值