原子类型数据需要同步吗?

    You may hear it said that to improve performance, you should avoid synchronization
when reading or writing atomic data. This advice is dangerously wrong.
While the language specification guarantees that a thread will not see an arbitrary
value when reading a field, it does not guarantee that a value written by one thread
will be visible to another. Synchronization is required for reliable communication
between threads as well as for mutual exclusion.

 

    原子类型数据(基本类型long、double除外),是不是操作它们的时候出于性能考虑就用不着同步了呢?

JLS规定一个线程读数据时不会见到任意值(也就完成互斥),但不保证被此线程所写的数据对另一线程可见。

 

// Cooperative thread termination with a volatile field
public class StopThread {
    private static volatile boolean stopRequested;
    public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
        Thread backgroundThread = new Thread(new Runnable() {
            public void run() {
                int i = 0;
                while (!stopRequested)
                    i++;
                }
        });
        backgroundThread.start();
        TimeUnit.SECONDS.sleep(1);
        stopRequested = true;
    }
}

 以上是正确代码

  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值