java5 vs python2.6

网上有个对比java和python运行效率的文章,闲的无聊,就把代码用java5和python2.6测试了一下,同样的代码,真是不测不知道一测吓一跳.我没测试完,我觉得测试这些意义不大,毕竟一个系统的运行效率高低和好多方面有关系,不只是简单的几行代码可以测试出来的.所以该测试没任何意义,只是以前有这个文章,我就测试一下,毕竟自己动手出来的结果才更有说服力.测试说明jdk运行效率确实提高了很多.提醒一下,不用要netbeans.eclipse之类的和IDLE对比,要用标准的concle再cmd下运行,如果用IDE的话,测试OUTPUT就不准了,因为java的IDE的输入都有缓存,速度更快.而IDLE却比标准的concle输出要慢的多.

我就测试前三项.这是原来的文章里的.

Test	Java	Python	Comparison
Standard Output	138.85	30.58	Python 4.5X Faster than Java
Hashtable	17.0	8.22	Python 2X Faster than Java
I/O	56.72	47.36	Python 1.2X Faster than Java

下面是我用jdk5和python2.6测试的

Test	Java	Python	Comparison
Standard Output	36.172	61.123	Python 4.5X Faster than Java
Hashtable	17.750	30.2069186659	Python 2X Faster than Java
I/O	0.390	1.41565481607	Python 1.2X Faster than Java

代码:

为了能更明显区分,hashtable我用了10000*10000的本来的文章里是1000*1000的,java5和python2.6太快了差别不明显

hashtable如果用1.5之前的不指定类型速度要稍微慢一些,

ConsoleTest
Python	Java
for x in xrange(1000000):     print x	public class ConsoleTest {     public static void main(String[] args) {         for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {             System.out.println(i);         }     } }

Hashtest
Python	Java
for i in xrange(10000):     x={}     for j in xrange(10000):         x[j]=i         x[j]	import java.util.Hashtable;   public class HashTest {     public static void main(String[] args) {         for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {             Hashtable x = new Hashtable();             for (int j = 0; j < 10000; j++) {                 x.put(new Integer(i), new Integer(j));                 x.get(new Integer(i));             }         }     } }

IOTest
Python	Java
f=open('scratch','wb') for i in xrange(1000000):     f.write(str(i)) f.close()	import java.io.*;   public class IOTest {     public static void main(String[] args) {         try {             File f = new File("scratch");             PrintWriter ps = new PrintWriter(new OutputStreamWriter                                              (new FileOutputStream(f)));             for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {                 ps.print(String.valueOf(i));             }             ps.close();         }         catch(IOException ioe) {             ioe.printStackTrace();         }     } }