C ++单元测试框架的比较[关闭]

本文翻译自：Comparison of C++ unit test frameworks [closed]

I know there are already a few questions regarding recommendations for C++ unit test frameworks, but all the answers did not help as they just recommend one of the frameworks but do not provide any information about a (feature) comparison. 我知道关于C ++单元测试框架的建议已经存在一些问题，但所有答案都没有帮助，因为他们只是推荐其中一个框架，但没有提供有关（特征）比较的任何信息。

I think the most interesting frameworks are CppUnit, Boost and the new Google testing framework. 我认为最有趣的框架是CppUnit，Boost和新的Google测试框架。 Has anybody done any comparison yet? 有人做过任何比较吗？

---

#1楼

参考：https://stackoom.com/question/11ca/C-单元测试框架的比较-关闭

---

#2楼

维基百科有一个完整的单元测试框架列表 ，其中包含可识别支持与否的功能的表。

---

#3楼

I've recently released xUnit++ , specifically as an alternative to Google Test and the Boost Test Library (view the comparisons ). 我最近发布了xUnit ++ ，特别是作为Google Test和Boost Test Library的替代品（查看比较 ）。 If you're familiar with xUnit.Net, you're ready for xUnit++. 如果您熟悉xUnit.Net，那么您已准备好使用xUnit ++。

#include "xUnit++/xUnit++.h"

FACT("Foo and Blah should always return the same value")
{
    Check.Equal("0", Foo()) << "Calling Foo() with no parameters should always return \"0\".";
    Assert.Equal(Foo(), Blah());
}

THEORY("Foo should return the same value it was given, converted to string", (int input, std::string expected),
    std::make_tuple(0, "0"),
    std::make_tuple(1, "1"),
    std::make_tuple(2, "2"))
{
    Assert.Equal(expected, Foo(input));
}

Main features: 主要特点：

• Incredibly fast: tests run concurrently . 令人难以置信的快速：测试同时运行。
• Portable 手提
• Automatic test registration 自动测试注册
• Many assertion types (Boost has nothing on xUnit++) 许多断言类型（Boost在xUnit ++上没有任何内容）
• Compares collections natively. 本地比较集合 。
• Assertions come in three levels: 断言分为三个层次：
  • fatal errors 致命错误
  • non-fatal errors 非致命错误
  • warnings 警告
• Easy assert logging: Assert.Equal(-1, foo(i)) << "Failed with i = " << i; 简单的断言记录： Assert.Equal(-1, foo(i)) << "Failed with i = " << i;
• Test logging: Log.Debug << "Starting test"; Log.Warn << "Here's a warning"; 测试记录： Log.Debug << "Starting test"; Log.Warn << "Here's a warning"; Log.Debug << "Starting test"; Log.Warn << "Here's a warning";
• Fixtures 赛程
• Data-driven tests (Theories) 数据驱动测试（理论）
• Select which tests to run based on: 根据以下内容选择要运行的测试 ：
  • Attribute matching 属性匹配
  • Name substring matchin 命名substring matchin
  • Test Suites 测试套房

---

#4楼

http://www.progweap.com/resources.html上有一些相关的C ++单元测试资源

---

#5楼

See this question for some discussion. 有关讨论， 请参阅此问题 。

They recommend the articles: Exploring the C++ Unit Testing Framework Jungle , By Noel Llopis. 他们推荐文章： 探索C ++单元测试框架Jungle ，作者：Noel Llopis。 And the more recent: C++ Test Unit Frameworks 最近的： C ++测试单元框架

I have not found an article that compares googletest to the other frameworks yet. 我还没有找到一篇将googletest与其他框架进行比较的文章。

---

#6楼

A new player is Google Test (also known as Google C++ Testing Framework ) which is pretty nice though. 一个新的播放器是Google Test （也称为Google C ++测试框架 ），但它非常好用。

#include <gtest/gtest.h>

TEST(MyTestSuitName, MyTestCaseName) {
    int actual = 1;
    EXPECT_GT(actual, 0);
    EXPECT_EQ(1, actual) << "Should be equal to one";
}

Main features: 主要特点：

• Portable 手提
• Fatal and non-fatal assertions 致命和非致命的断言
• Easy assertions informative messages : ASSERT_EQ(5, Foo(i)) << " where i = " << i; 简单的断言信息性消息 ： ASSERT_EQ(5, Foo(i)) << " where i = " << i;
• Google Test automatically detects your tests and doesn't require you to enumerate them in order to run them Google Test会自动检测您的测试，并且不需要您枚举它们才能运行它们
• Make it easy to extend your assertion vocabulary 可以轻松扩展断言词汇表
• Death tests (see advanced guide) 死亡测试 （参见高级指南）
• SCOPED_TRACE for subroutine loops SCOPED_TRACE用于子程序循环
• You can decide which tests to run 您可以决定运行哪些测试
• XML test report generation XML测试报告生成
• Fixtures / Mock / Templates ... 固定装置 / 模拟 / 模板 ......