分页查询性能比较

今天做了分页查询的性能测试,发现写一个好的分页查询语句,性能查询的差别是巨大!

 

建立测试表

 

create table test as select * from dba_objects

 

执行如下分页查询语句1:

 

set autotrace on

 

select * from (select t.*, rownum rn from (select * from TEST) t where rownum < 40) where rn >21

 

执行计划如下:仅仅六个逻辑读.

 

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 891187116

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation           | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |      |    39 |  7410 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  1 |  VIEW               |      |    39 |  7410 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  2 |   COUNT STOPKEY     |      |       |       |            |          |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST |    39 |  3549 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("RN">21)
   2 - filter(ROWNUM<40)

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
          6  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
       2158  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        503  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
         18  rows processed

 

 

 

执行如下分页查询语句2:

 

SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT A.*, ROWNUM RN
FROM (SELECT * FROM TEST) A
)
WHERE RN BETWEEN 21 AND 40

 

执行计划如下:807个逻辑读.

 

Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 607533624

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation           | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |      | 59588 |    10M|   188   (7)| 00:00:03 |
|*  1 |  VIEW               |      | 59588 |    10M|   188   (7)| 00:00:03 |
|   2 |   COUNT             |      |       |       |            |          |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST | 59588 |  5295K|   188   (7)| 00:00:03 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   1 - filter("RN"<=40 AND "RN">=21)

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          1  recursive calls
          0  db block gets
        807  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
          0  redo size
       2219  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        503  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
         20  rows processed

 

总结,对于一个高访问量的网站,如果采用第一种的分页查询,性能会有巨大的提升!

 

 

来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ，链接：http://blog.itpub.net/8410760/viewspace-731957/，如需转载，请注明出处，否则将追究法律责任。

转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/8410760/viewspace-731957/