In libvirt, it's perfectly possible and widely used to have disabled timers (timeout=-1) and fire them up 'randomly' with timeout=0. However, with current mapping into glib mainloop it's not possible and causing troubles.
阅读(88) | 评论(0) | 转发(0) |
<script type=text/javascript charset=utf-8 src="http://static.bshare.cn/b/buttonLite.js#style=-1&uuid=&pophcol=3&lang=zh"></script> <script type=text/javascript charset=utf-8 src="http://static.bshare.cn/b/bshareC0.js"></script>
--- libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c b/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c index 94f4de8..c3eb3c8 100644 --- a/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c +++ b/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@
gvir_event_timeout_update(int timer, if (interval >= 0) {
if (data->source)
- goto cleanup;
+ g_source_remove(data->source);
data->interval = interval; data->source = g_timeout_add(data->interval,
-- 1.7.8.5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819617https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-May/msg01157.htmlhttp://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-June/msg00445.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819617https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-May/msg01157.htmlhttp://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-June/msg00445.html
相关热门文章
给主人留下些什么吧!~~
评论热议