本节介绍了PostgreSQL获取事务号XID的逻辑,主要解析了函数AssignTransactionId->GetNewTransactionId的实现逻辑。
在GetNewTransactionId函数中,检查是否可以安全的分配XID.
这可以防止由于XID wraparound而导致的灾难性数据丢失.
基本规则是:
如果超过了xidVacLimit,开始尝试强制autovacuum循环.
如果超过了xidWarnLimit,开始发出警告.
如果超过了xidStopLimit,拒绝执行事务,直至以单用户模式运行.
(这为DBA提供了一个逃生通道，使他们能够通过数据库早期的安全性检测,进入数据库进行维护)
ShmemVariableCache->xidVacLimit —> 200,000,561 —> 大于等于该值,触发自动vacuum
ShmemVariableCache->xidWarnLimit —> 2,136,484,208 —> 大于等于该值,系统报警
ShmemVariableCache->xidStopLimit —> 2,146,484,208 —> 大于等于该值,系统不允许执行事务,使用单用户模式处理
一、数据结构
TransactionState
事务状态结构体
/*
* transaction states - transaction state from server perspective
* 事务状态枚举 - 服务器视角的事务状态
*/
typedef enum TransState
{
TRANS_DEFAULT, /* idle 空闲 */
TRANS_START, /* transaction starting 事务启动 */
TRANS_INPROGRESS, /* inside a valid transaction 进行中 */
TRANS_COMMIT, /* commit in progress 提交中 */
TRANS_ABORT, /* abort in progress 回滚中 */
TRANS_PREPARE /* prepare in progress 准备中 */
} TransState;
/*
* transaction block states - transaction state of client queries
* 事务块状态 - 客户端查询的事务状态
*
* Note: the subtransaction states are used only for non-topmost
* transactions; the others appear only in the topmost transaction.
* 注意:subtransaction只用于非顶层事务;其他字段用于顶层事务.
*/
typedef enum TBlockState
{
/* not-in-transaction-block states 未进入事务块状态 */
TBLOCK_DEFAULT, /* idle 空闲 */
TBLOCK_STARTED, /* running single-query transaction 单个查询事务 */
/* transaction block states 事务块状态 */
TBLOCK_BEGIN, /* starting transaction block 开始事务块 */
TBLOCK_INPROGRESS, /* live transaction 进行中 */
TBLOCK_IMPLICIT_INPROGRESS, /* live transaction after implicit BEGIN 隐式事务,进行中 */
TBLOCK_PARALLEL_INPROGRESS, /* live transaction inside parallel worker 并行worker中的事务,进行中 */
TBLOCK_END, /* COMMIT received 接收到COMMIT */
TBLOCK_ABORT, /* failed xact, awaiting ROLLBACK 失败,等待ROLLBACK */
TBLOCK_ABORT_END, /* failed xact, ROLLBACK received 失败,已接收ROLLBACK */
TBLOCK_ABORT_PENDING, /* live xact, ROLLBACK received 进行中,接收到ROLLBACK */
TBLOCK_PREPARE, /* live xact, PREPARE received 进行中,接收到PREPARE */
/* subtransaction states 子事务状态 */
TBLOCK_SUBBEGIN, /* starting a subtransaction 开启 */
TBLOCK_SUBINPROGRESS, /* live subtransaction 进行中 */
TBLOCK_SUBRELEASE, /* RELEASE received 接收到RELEASE */
TBLOCK_SUBCOMMIT, /* COMMIT received while TBLOCK_SUBINPROGRESS 进行中,接收到COMMIT */
TBLOCK_SUBABORT, /* failed subxact, awaiting ROLLBACK 失败,等待ROLLBACK */
TBLOCK_SUBABORT_END, /* failed subxact, ROLLBACK received 失败,已接收ROLLBACK */
TBLOCK_SUBABORT_PENDING, /* live subxact, ROLLBACK received 进行中,接收到ROLLBACK */
TBLOCK_SUBRESTART, /* live subxact, ROLLBACK TO received 进行中,接收到ROLLBACK TO */
TBLOCK_SUBABORT_RESTART /* failed subxact, ROLLBACK TO received 失败,已接收ROLLBACK TO */
} TBlockState;
/*
* transaction state structure
* 事务状态结构体
*/
typedef struct TransactionStateData
{
//事务ID
TransactionId transactionId; /* my XID, or Invalid if none */
//子事务ID
SubTransactionId subTransactionId; /* my subxact ID */
//保存点名称
char *name; /* savepoint name, if any */
//保存点级别
int savepointLevel; /* savepoint level */
//低级别的事务状态
TransState state; /* low-level state */
//高级别的事务状态
TBlockState blockState; /* high-level state */
//事务嵌套深度
int nestingLevel; /* transaction nesting depth */
//GUC上下文嵌套深度
int gucNestLevel; /* GUC context nesting depth */
//事务生命周期上下文
MemoryContext curTransactionContext; /* my xact-lifetime context */
//查询资源
ResourceOwner curTransactionOwner; /* my query resources */
//按XID顺序保存的已提交的子事务ID
TransactionId *childXids; /* subcommitted child XIDs, in XID order */
//childXids数组大小
int nChildXids; /* # of subcommitted child XIDs */
//分配的childXids数组空间
int maxChildXids; /* allocated size of childXids[] */
//上一个CurrentUserId
Oid prevUser; /* previous CurrentUserId setting */
//上一个SecurityRestrictionContext
int prevSecContext; /* previous SecurityRestrictionContext */
//上一事务是否只读?
bool prevXactReadOnly; /* entry-time xact r/o state */
//是否处于Recovery?
bool startedInRecovery; /* did we start in recovery? */
//XID是否已保存在WAL Record中?
bool didLogXid; /* has xid been included in WAL record? */
//Enter/ExitParallelMode计数器
int parallelModeLevel; /* Enter/ExitParallelMode counter */
//父事务状态
struct TransactionStateData *parent; /* back link to parent */
} TransactionStateData;
//结构体指针
typedef TransactionStateData *TransactionState;
ShmemVariableCache
VariableCache是共享内存中的一种数据结构，用于跟踪OID和XID分配状态。
ShmemVariableCache—>共享内存中的指针
/*
* VariableCache is a data structure in shared memory that is used to track
* OID and XID assignment state. For largely historical reasons, there is
* just one struct with different fields that are protected by different
* LWLocks.
* VariableCache是共享内存中的一种数据结构，用于跟踪OID和XID分配状态。
* 由于历史原因，这个结构体有不同的字段,由不同的LWLocks保护。
*
* Note: xidWrapLimit and oldestXidDB are not "active" values, but are
* used just to generate useful messages when xidWarnLimit or xidStopLimit
* are exceeded.
* 注意:xidWrapLimit和oldestXidDB是不"活跃"的值,在xidWarnLimit或xidStopLimit
* 超出限制时用于产生有用的信息.
*/
typedef struct VariableCacheData
{
/*
* These fields are protected by OidGenLock.
* 这些域字段通过OidGenLock字段保护
*/
//下一个待分配的OID
Oid nextOid; /* next OID to assign */
//在必须执行XLOG work前可用OIDs
uint32 oidCount; /* OIDs available before must do XLOG work */
/*
* These fields are protected by XidGenLock.
* 这些字段通过XidGenLock锁保护.
*/
//下一个待分配的事务ID
TransactionId nextXid; /* next XID to assign */
//集群范围内最小datfrozenxid
TransactionId oldestXid; /* cluster-wide minimum datfrozenxid */
//在该XID开始强制执行autovacuum
TransactionId xidVacLimit; /* start forcing autovacuums here */
//在该XID开始提出警告
TransactionId xidWarnLimit; /* start complaining here */
//在该XID开外,拒绝生成下一个XID
TransactionId xidStopLimit; /* refuse to advance nextXid beyond here */
//"世界末日"XID,需回卷
TransactionId xidWrapLimit; /* where the world ends */
//持有最小datfrozenxid的DB
Oid oldestXidDB; /* database with minimum datfrozenxid */
/*
* These fields are protected by CommitTsLock
* 这些字段通过CommitTsLock锁保护
*/
TransactionId oldestCommitTsXid;
TransactionId newestCommitTsXid;
/*
* These fields are protected by ProcArrayLock.
* 这些字段通过ProcArrayLock锁保护
*/
TransactionId latestCompletedXid; /* newest XID that has committed or
* aborted */
/*
* These fields are protected by CLogTruncationLock
* 这些字段通过CLogTruncationLock锁保护
*/
//clog中最古老的XID
TransactionId oldestClogXid; /* oldest it's safe to look up in clog */
} VariableCacheData;
//结构体指针
typedef VariableCacheData *VariableCache;
/* pointer to "variable cache" in shared memory (set up by shmem.c) */
//共享内存中的指针(通过shmem.c设置)
VariableCache ShmemVariableCache = NULL;
二、源码解读
AssignTransactionId函数,给定的TransactionState分配一个新的持久化事务号XID,在此函数调用前,不会为事务分配XIDs.GetNewTransactionId是获取事务ID实际执行的地方,该函数从共享内存变量ShmemVariableCache中获取nextXid,+1后作为新的XID.
/*
* Allocate the next XID for a new transaction or subtransaction.
* 为新事务或新子事务分配XID
*
* The new XID is also stored into MyPgXact before returning.
* 在返回前,XID会存储在全局变量MyPgXact中
*
* Note: when this is called, we are actually already inside a valid
* transaction, since XIDs are now not allocated until the transaction
* does something. So it is safe to do a database lookup if we want to
* issue a warning about XID wrap.
* 注意:在该函数调用时,我们实际上已在一个有效的事务中,因为XIDs在事务不做些事情前不会分配.
* 因此，如果我们想发出关于XID wrap回卷的警告，那么进行数据库查找是安全的。
*/
TransactionId
GetNewTransactionId(bool isSubXact)
{
TransactionId xid;
/*
* Workers synchronize transaction state at the beginning of each parallel
* operation, so we can't account for new XIDs after that point.
* 在每个并行操作前,Parallel Workers同步事务状态,
* 因此我们不能在这时候请求XIDs
*/
if (IsInParallelMode())
elog(ERROR, "cannot assign TransactionIds during a parallel operation");
/*
* During bootstrap initialization, we return the special bootstrap
* transaction id.
* 在宇宙初启时,返回特别的bootstrap事务ID
*/
if (IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
{
Assert(!isSubXact);
MyPgXact->xid = BootstrapTransactionId;
return BootstrapTransactionId;//--> 1
}
/* safety check, we should never get this far in a HS standby */
* 安全检查
if (RecoveryInProgress())
elog(ERROR, "cannot assign TransactionIds during recovery");
LWLockAcquire(XidGenLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
//从共享内存中获取下一个XID
xid = ShmemVariableCache->nextXid;
/*----------
* Check to see if it's safe to assign another XID. This protects against
* catastrophic data loss due to XID wraparound. The basic rules are:
* 检查是否可以安全的分配另外一个XID.
* 这可以防止由于XID wraparound而导致的灾难性数据丢失.
* 基本规则是:
*
* If we're past xidVacLimit, start trying to force autovacuum cycles.
* If we're past xidWarnLimit, start issuing warnings.
* If we're past xidStopLimit, refuse to execute transactions, unless
* we are running in single-user mode (which gives an escape hatch
* to the DBA who somehow got past the earlier defenses).
* 如果超过了xidVacLimit,开始尝试强制autovacuum循环.
* 如果超过了xidWarnLimit,开始发出警告.
* 如果超过了xidStopLimit,拒绝执行事务,直至以单用户模式运行.
* (这为DBA提供了一个逃生通道，使他们能够通过数据库早期的安全性检测)
*
* Note that this coding also appears in GetNewMultiXactId.
* 注意这部分代码在GetNewMultiXactId中也会出现.
*----------
*/
//TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals --> is id1 logically >= id2?
if (TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals(xid, ShmemVariableCache->xidVacLimit))
{
//xid >= ShmemVariableCache->xidVacLimit
/*
* For safety's sake, we release XidGenLock while sending signals,
* warnings, etc. This is not so much because we care about
* preserving concurrency in this situation, as to avoid any
* possibility of deadlock while doing get_database_name(). First,
* copy all the shared values we'll need in this path.
* 为了安全起见，我们在发送信号、警告等时释放XidGenLock。
* 这并不是因为我们关心在这种情况下并发性，
* 而是因为在执行get_database_name()时要避免出现死锁
*/
//获取相关XID
TransactionId xidWarnLimit = ShmemVariableCache->xidWarnLimit;
TransactionId xidStopLimit = ShmemVariableCache->xidStopLimit;
TransactionId xidWrapLimit = ShmemVariableCache->xidWrapLimit;
Oid oldest_datoid = ShmemVariableCache->oldestXidDB;
LWLockRelease(XidGenLock);
/*
* To avoid swamping the postmaster with signals, we issue the autovac
* request only once per 64K transaction starts. This still gives
* plenty of chances before we get into real trouble.
* 为了避免信号淹没postmaster，我们每64K事务开始时只发出一次autovac请求。
* 在我们陷入真正的麻烦之前，这仍然给了我们很多解决问题的机会。
*/
if (IsUnderPostmaster && (xid % 65536) == 0)
//每隔64K发一次
SendPostmasterSignal(PMSIGNAL_START_AUTOVAC_LAUNCHER);
if (IsUnderPostmaster &&
TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals(xid, xidStopLimit))
{
//xid >= ShmemVariableCache->xidStopLimit
char *oldest_datname = get_database_name(oldest_datoid);
/* complain even if that DB has disappeared */
//就算DB已消失,也要不停的警告:(
if (oldest_datname)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
errmsg("database is not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss in database \"%s\"",
oldest_datname),
errhint("Stop the postmaster and vacuum that database in single-user mode.\n"
"You might also need to commit or roll back old prepared transactions, or drop stale replication slots.")));
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
errmsg("database is not accepting commands to avoid wraparound data loss in database with OID %u",
oldest_datoid),
errhint("Stop the postmaster and vacuum that database in single-user mode.\n"
"You might also need to commit or roll back old prepared transactions, or drop stale replication slots.")));
}
else if (TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals(xid, xidWarnLimit))
{
xid >= ShmemVariableCache->xidWarnLimit
char *oldest_datname = get_database_name(oldest_datoid);
/* complain even if that DB has disappeared */
if (oldest_datname)
ereport(WARNING,
(errmsg("database \"%s\" must be vacuumed within %u transactions",
oldest_datname,
xidWrapLimit - xid),
errhint("To avoid a database shutdown, execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.\n"
"You might also need to commit or roll back old prepared transactions, or drop stale replication slots.")));
else
ereport(WARNING,
(errmsg("database with OID %u must be vacuumed within %u transactions",
oldest_datoid,
xidWrapLimit - xid),
errhint("To avoid a database shutdown, execute a database-wide VACUUM in that database.\n"
"You might also need to commit or roll back old prepared transactions, or drop stale replication slots.")));
}
/* Re-acquire lock and start over */
//重新获取锁并启动
LWLockAcquire(XidGenLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
xid = ShmemVariableCache->nextXid;
}
/*
* If we are allocating the first XID of a new page of the commit log,
* zero out that commit-log page before returning. We must do this while
* holding XidGenLock, else another xact could acquire and commit a later
* XID before we zero the page. Fortunately, a page of the commit log
* holds 32K or more transactions, so we don't have to do this very often.
* 如果在clog的新page中分配第一个XID,返回前初始化clog page.
* 必须在持有XidGenLock锁时执行这个操作,否则的话,
* 其他事务可能会请求该锁并在初始化page前提交了一个新事务.
* 幸运的是，提交日志的一个页面包含32K或更多的事务，所以我们不需要经常这样做。
*
* Extend pg_subtrans and pg_commit_ts too.
* 同时扩展pg_subtrans和pg_commit_ts
*/
ExtendCLOG(xid);
ExtendCommitTs(xid);
ExtendSUBTRANS(xid);
/*
* Now advance the nextXid counter. This must not happen until after we
* have successfully completed ExtendCLOG() --- if that routine fails, we
* want the next incoming transaction to try it again. We cannot assign
* more XIDs until there is CLOG space for them.
* 现在可以更新nextXid计数器了.
* 这必须在我们成功完成ExtendCLOG()之后才能执行——如果该例程失败，
* 我们希望下一个进入的事务再次尝试。
* 不能分配更多的xid，除非有空闲的CLOG空间。
*/
//ShmemVariableCache->nextXid ++
//if ((ShmemVariableCache->nextXid) < FirstNormalTransactionId)
// (ShmemVariableCache->nextXid) = FirstNormalTransactionId;
TransactionIdAdvance(ShmemVariableCache->nextXid);
/*
* We must store the new XID into the shared ProcArray before releasing
* XidGenLock. This ensures that every active XID older than
* latestCompletedXid is present in the ProcArray, which is essential for
* correct OldestXmin tracking; see src/backend/access/transam/README.
* 在释放XidGenLock前,存储新的XID到共享数据结构ProcArray中.
* 这可以确保每一个活动的比latestCompletedXid旧的XID都会出现在ProcArray中,
* 这样可以减少OldestXmin的跟踪,请查看src/backend/access/transam/README.
*
* Note that readers of PGXACT xid fields should be careful to fetch the
* value only once, rather than assume they can read a value multiple
* times and get the same answer each time. Note we are assuming that
* TransactionId and int fetch/store are atomic.
* 要注意的是读取PGXACT.xid字段时小心只提取一次,
* 而不是假定可以多次读取该值而认为每次返回的值都一样.
* 同时我们假定TransactionId和int 提取/写入是原子的.
*
* The same comments apply to the subxact xid count and overflow fields.
* 对于subxact xid计数器和溢出字段,参见上述注释.
*
* Use of a write barrier prevents dangerous code rearrangement in this
* function; other backends could otherwise e.g. be examining my subxids
* info concurrently, and we don't want them to see an invalid
* intermediate state, such as an incremented nxids before the array entry
* is filled.
* 在该函数中,进入堡垒进行写可以防止危险的事情出现.
* 否则其他后台进程可能会比如同步检查本进程的subxids信息,但我们不希望它们看到无效的中间状态,
* 例如，在数组条目被填充之前增加nxid。
*
* Other processes that read nxids should do so before reading xids
* elements with a pg_read_barrier() in between, so that they can be sure
* not to read an uninitialized array element; see
* src/backend/storage/lmgr/README.barrier.
* 其他读取nxids的进程应在使用pg_read_barrier()函数读取xids条目前执行相关操作,
* 这样可以确保它们不会读取到未经初始化的数组条目,查看src/backend/storage/lmgr/README.barrier说明.
*
* If there's no room to fit a subtransaction XID into PGPROC, set the
* cache-overflowed flag instead. This forces readers to look in
* pg_subtrans to map subtransaction XIDs up to top-level XIDs. There is a
* race-condition window, in that the new XID will not appear as running
* until its parent link has been placed into pg_subtrans. However, that
* will happen before anyone could possibly have a reason to inquire about
* the status of the XID, so it seems OK. (Snapshots taken during this
* window *will* include the parent XID, so they will deliver the correct
* answer later on when someone does have a reason to inquire.)
* 如果没有空间将子事务XID放入PGPROC中，则设置cache-overflow标志。
* 这可以强制readers查看pg_subtrans以将子事务xid映射到顶层xid。
* 有一个race-condition窗口，在它的父链接被放入pg_subtrans之前，新的XID不会显示为正在运行.
* 然而，在都有可能有理由查询XID的状态之前，这种情况就会发生，所以看起来是可以的。
* (在这个窗口中拍摄的快照*将*包含父XID，因此当稍后有进程查询时，它们将提供正确的答案。)
*/
if (!isSubXact)
MyPgXact->xid = xid; /* LWLockRelease acts as barrier */
else
{
int nxids = MyPgXact->nxids;
if (nxids < PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS)
{
MyProc->subxids.xids[nxids] = xid;
pg_write_barrier();
MyPgXact->nxids = nxids + 1;
}
else
MyPgXact->overflowed = true;
}
//释放锁
LWLockRelease(XidGenLock);
return xid;
}
三、跟踪分析
执行txid_current,触发函数调用
14:26:26 (xdb@[local]:5432)testdb=# begin;
BEGIN
14:26:50 (xdb@[local]:5432)testdb=#* select txid_current_if_assigned();
txid_current_if_assigned
--------------------------
(1 row)
14:26:55 (xdb@[local]:5432)testdb=#* select txid_current();
启动gdb,设置断点
(gdb) b GetNewTransactionId
Breakpoint 6 at 0x545e80: file varsup.c, line 56.
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 6, GetNewTransactionId (isSubXact=false) at varsup.c:56
56 if (IsInParallelMode())
(gdb)
查看调用栈
(gdb) bt
#0 GetNewTransactionId (isSubXact=false) at varsup.c:56
#1 0x0000000000546bd9 in AssignTransactionId (s=0xf9c720 <TopTransactionStateData>) at xact.c:557
#2 0x000000000054693d in GetTopTransactionId () at xact.c:392
#3 0x00000000009fe1f3 in txid_current (fcinfo=0x254c7e0) at txid.c:443
#4 0x00000000006cfebd in ExecInterpExpr (state=0x254c6f8, econtext=0x254c3e8, isnull=0x7ffe3d4a31f7)
at execExprInterp.c:654
#5 0x00000000006d1ac6 in ExecInterpExprStillValid (state=0x254c6f8, econtext=0x254c3e8, isNull=0x7ffe3d4a31f7)
at execExprInterp.c:1786
#6 0x00000000007140dd in ExecEvalExprSwitchContext (state=0x254c6f8, econtext=0x254c3e8, isNull=0x7ffe3d4a31f7)
at ../../../src/include/executor/executor.h:303
#7 0x000000000071414b in ExecProject (projInfo=0x254c6f0) at ../../../src/include/executor/executor.h:337
#8 0x0000000000714323 in ExecResult (pstate=0x254c2d0) at nodeResult.c:136
#9 0x00000000006e4c30 in ExecProcNodeFirst (node=0x254c2d0) at execProcnode.c:445
#10 0x00000000006d9974 in ExecProcNode (node=0x254c2d0) at ../../../src/include/executor/executor.h:237
#11 0x00000000006dc22d in ExecutePlan (estate=0x254c0b8, planstate=0x254c2d0, use_parallel_mode=false,
operation=CMD_SELECT, sendTuples=true, numberTuples=0, direction=ForwardScanDirection, dest=0x24ccf10,
execute_once=true) at execMain.c:1723
#12 0x00000000006d9f5c in standard_ExecutorRun (queryDesc=0x256b8e8, direction=ForwardScanDirection, count=0,
execute_once=true) at execMain.c:364
#13 0x00000000006d9d7f in ExecutorRun (queryDesc=0x256b8e8, direction=ForwardScanDirection, count=0, execute_once=true)
at execMain.c:307
#14 0x00000000008ccf5a in PortalRunSelect (portal=0x250c860, forward=true, count=0, dest=0x24ccf10) at pquery.c:932
#15 0x00000000008ccbf3 in PortalRun (portal=0x250c860, count=9223372036854775807, isTopLevel=true, run_once=true,
dest=0x24ccf10, altdest=0x24ccf10, completionTag=0x7ffe3d4a3570 "") at pquery.c:773
#16 0x00000000008c6b1e in exec_simple_query (query_string=0x24a6ec8 "select txid_current();") at postgres.c:1145
#17 0x00000000008cae70 in PostgresMain (argc=1, argv=0x24d2dc8, dbname=0x24d2c30 "testdb", username=0x24a3ba8 "xdb")
at postgres.c:4182
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#18 0x000000000082642b in BackendRun (port=0x24c8c00) at postmaster.c:4361
#19 0x0000000000825b8f in BackendStartup (port=0x24c8c00) at postmaster.c:4033
#20 0x0000000000821f1c in ServerLoop () at postmaster.c:1706
#21 0x00000000008217b4 in PostmasterMain (argc=1, argv=0x24a1b60) at postmaster.c:1379
#22 0x00000000007488ef in main (argc=1, argv=0x24a1b60) at main.c:228
(gdb)
获取XidGenLock锁
(gdb) n
63 if (IsBootstrapProcessingMode())
(gdb)
71 if (RecoveryInProgress())
(gdb)
74 LWLockAcquire(XidGenLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
(gdb)
获取共享内存变量ShmemVariableCache->nextXid —> 2409
(gdb)
76 xid = ShmemVariableCache->nextXid;
(gdb)
91 if (TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals(xid, ShmemVariableCache->xidVacLimit))
(gdb) p *ShmemVariableCache
$16 = {nextOid = 42628, oidCount = 8191, nextXid = 2409, oldestXid = 561, xidVacLimit = 200000561,
xidWarnLimit = 2136484208, xidStopLimit = 2146484208, xidWrapLimit = 2147484208, oldestXidDB = 16400,
oldestCommitTsXid = 0, newestCommitTsXid = 0, latestCompletedXid = 2408, oldestClogXid = 561}
(gdb)
扩展clog
(gdb) n
171 ExtendCLOG(xid);
(gdb)
172 ExtendCommitTs(xid);
(gdb)
173 ExtendSUBTRANS(xid);
(gdb)
181 TransactionIdAdvance(ShmemVariableCache->nextXid);
(gdb)
ShmemVariableCache->nextXid++ —> 2410
(gdb) p ShmemVariableCache->nextXid
$17 = 2410
获取进程和事务信息
(gdb) n
223 volatile PGXACT *mypgxact = MyPgXact;
(gdb)
225 if (!isSubXact)
(gdb)
226 mypgxact->xid = xid;
(gdb)
释放锁XidGenLock
(gdb)
241 LWLockRelease(XidGenLock);
(gdb) p *ShmemVariableCache
$18 = {nextOid = 42628, oidCount = 8191, nextXid = 2410, oldestXid = 561, xidVacLimit = 200000561,
xidWarnLimit = 2136484208, xidStopLimit = 2146484208, xidWrapLimit = 2147484208, oldestXidDB = 16400,
oldestCommitTsXid = 0, newestCommitTsXid = 0, latestCompletedXid = 2408, oldestClogXid = 561}
返回xid(2409),完成调用.
(gdb) n
243 return xid;
(gdb)
244 }
(gdb)
AssignTransactionId (s=0xf9c720 <TopTransactionStateData>) at xact.c:558
558 if (!isSubXact)
(gdb)
DONE!
四、参考资料
来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ，链接：http://blog.itpub.net/6906/viewspace-2564038/，如需转载，请注明出处，否则将追究法律责任。
转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/6906/viewspace-2564038/
扫一扫
1301
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
