关于NFS、gfs2、ocfs2性能测试对比

在多节点集群环境中有些朋友可能会不知如何选择一个适合自己环境的文件系统,是选择NFS还是GFS2亦或是OCFS2还是几种混合使用都是个难题,可以通过产看以下相关信息来斟酌选择:

[@more@]● NFS
– Pro: standard, cross-platform, easy to implement
– Con: Poor performance, single point of failure
(single locking manager, even in HA)
● GFS2
– Pro: Very responsive on large datafiles, works on
physical and virtual, quota and SE-Linux
support, faster than EXT3 when I/O operations
are on the same node
– Con: Only supported with Red Hat, Performance
issues on accessing small files on several
subdirectory on different nodes
● OCFS2
– Pro: Very fast with large and small datafiles on
different node with two types of performance
models (mail, datafile). Works on a physical
and virtual.
– Con: Supported only through contract with Oracle
or SLES, no quota support, no on-line resize

来自 “ ITPUB博客 ” ,链接:http://blog.itpub.net/10130206/viewspace-1048037/,如需转载,请注明出处,否则将追究法律责任。

转载于:http://blog.itpub.net/10130206/viewspace-1048037/

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值