苹果xr降级失败无限白苹果_为什么苹果的道德审查制度注定要失败

苹果xr降级失败无限白苹果

Free-speech campaigners are complaining that Apple is censoring content. The company’s stance has led to the banning of satirical works and a comic book version of James Joyce’s Ulysses which featured hand-drawn nudity. (Incidentally, the original book was banned as obscene in the US and UK until courts eventually accepted the work in the 1930s.)

言论自由的活动家抱怨苹果公司正在审查内容。 该公司的立场导致禁止讽刺作品，并禁止使用詹姆斯·乔伊斯(James Joyce)的《尤利西斯》(Ulysses)漫画版，其中包括手绘的裸体内容。 (顺便说一句，在法院最终于1930年代接受该作品之前，在美国和英国，该原始书籍被禁止作为淫秽物品使用 。)

There’s no doubt that Apple are creating glorious products. They are a successful business and are protecting their commercial interests. If you want an application or music on your iPhone, you must purchase it from Apple. It’s a fantastic model which few have replicated in the business world. If you don’t like it, you don’t need to buy an iPhone.

毫无疑问，苹果公司正在创造辉煌的产品。 他们是一家成功的企业，正在保护其商业利益。 如果要在iPhone上使用应用程序或音乐，则必须从Apple购买。 这是一个极好的模型，在商业世界中很少有人复制。 如果您不喜欢它，则无需购买iPhone。

Unfortunately, this hard-nosed business concept conflicts with Apple’s tree-hugging hippy-friendly image. Steve Jobs can’t say he’s “protecting business interests” because he doesn’t want Apple to be seen as another boring IT supplier in the mold of IBM or Microsoft. Instead, Apple have embarked on a moral crusade. They’re “protecting customers” from the evils of bad applications, Flash, offensive content and pornography.

不幸的是，这个刻薄的商业概念与苹果树拥抱树立的嬉皮友好形象冲突。 史蒂夫·乔布斯(Steve Jobs)不能说他在“保护商业利益”，因为他不希望苹果成为IBM或Microsoft的另一个无聊的IT供应商。 取而代之的是，苹果开始了道德上的十字军东征。 他们“保护客户”免受不良应用程序，Flash，令人反感的内容和色情内容的危害。

(Of course, if they really want to protect users, Apple should remove Safari or have all internet access routed through a filtering proxy server which blocks offensive content. Perhaps they will?)

(当然，如果他们真的想保护用户，苹果应该删除Safari或通过过滤代理服务器路由所有Internet访问，该代理服务器会阻止令人反感的内容。也许他们会这样做吗？)

Apple has appointed itself as your moral guardian so it must censor content. That’s a risk:

苹果已经任命自己为您的道德监护人，因此它必须审查内容。 有风险：

1. How can any commercial company make an unbiased decision about what is or isn’t in your interest?
   任何一家商业公司如何才能公正地决定您的利益是什么？
2. The dividing line between art, pornography, benign content and offensive text is blurred and highly subjective. Yet Apple must make consistent black and white decisions every day.
   艺术，色情，良性内容和令人反感的文字之间的分界线是模糊且高度主观的。 然而，Apple必须每天做出一致的黑白决定。
3. Banned apps and content receive far more publicity than those which are accepted. It can reflect badly on Apple and developers could even start using it to their advantage. For example, why not knock-up an iPhone version of your existing web/desktop application which you know will be banned? The story will raise the profile of your company at Apple’s expense.
   与被接受的应用程序和内容相比，被禁止的应用程序和内容获得的宣传要多得多。 它可能对苹果造成严重影响，开发人员甚至可以开始利用它来发挥自己的优势。 例如，为什么不删除您知道将被禁止的现有Web /桌面应用程序的iPhone版本？ 这个故事将提高苹果公司的形象，而苹果将为此付出代价。
4. However, it’s the applications and content Apple accept which could cause the biggest problems. An approved product is rubber-stamped as being of high-quality and containing no dubious content. It’s a huge undertaking and what if I stumble across something which offends me? Does that mean Apple has failed? Can I claim a refund? Can I sue the company?
   但是，Apple接受的应用程序和内容可能会导致最大的问题。 认可的产品会被加盖橡胶印章，因为它是高质量的，不含可疑成分。 这是一项艰巨的任务，如果我偶然遇到冒犯我的东西怎么办？ 这是否意味着苹果失败了？ 我可以要求退款吗？ 我可以起诉公司吗？

It’s easy for Apple to manage a few hundred thousand applications while the mobile market is relatively small. But it’s growing fast — how will Apple cope when it’s doubled or tripled?

在移动市场相对较小的情况下，Apple可以轻松管理数十万个应用程序。 但是它发展Swift-当苹果翻倍或翻倍时，苹果将如何应对？

However, it’s the commercial cost that will ultimately end Apple’s “honorable” intentions. The vast majority of applications in the App Store never make a profit, yet Apple must pay someone to thoroughly check every submission. That cost will grow indefinitely if an application’s acceptance or rejection incurs legal complications.

然而，商业成本最终将终结苹果的“光荣”意图。 App Store中的绝大多数应用程序从未获利，但Apple必须向某人付费以彻底检查每个提交内容。 如果应用程序的接受或拒绝引起法律复杂性，则该成本将无限期增加。

Censorship is a massive cost for any company and Microsoft should take note (they’re planning similar moralistic rules for Windows 7 Phone apps). It might take a few court cases, but I doubt it has a viable long-term commercial future at Apple.

审查制度对任何公司来说都是沉重的成本，Microsoft应该注意(他们正在为Windows 7 Phone应用计划类似的道德准则)。 可能要审理几个案件，但我怀疑它在苹果公司的长期商业前景是可行的。

翻译自: https://www.sitepoint.com/why-apples-moral-censorship-is-doomed/

苹果xr降级失败无限白苹果